Wininger Austin E, Lambert Bradley S, Sullivan Thomas C, Brown Timothy S, Incavo Stephen J, Park Kwan J
Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston Methodist Orthopedics & Sports Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Arthroplast Today. 2023 Sep 19;23:101196. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2023.101196. eCollection 2023 Oct.
Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) has been shown to reduce the number of alignment outliers and to improve component positioning compared to manual TKA (mTKA). The primary purpose of this investigation was to compare the frequency of achieving target postoperative limb alignment and component positioning for rTKA vs mTKA.
A retrospective comparative study was performed on 250 patients undergoing primary TKA by 2 fellowship-trained arthroplasty surgeons. Surgeon A performed predominantly rTKA (103 cases) with the ROSA system (Zimmer Biomet, Warsaw, IN) and less frequently mTKA (44 cases) with conventional instrumentation. Surgeon B performed only mTKA (103 cases). Target limb alignment for surgeon A was 0° for all cases and for surgeon B was 2° varus for varus knees and 0° for valgus knees. Radiographic measurements were determined by 2 reviewers. Target zone was set at ± 2 degrees from the predefined target.
When comparing rTKA to mTKA performed by different surgeons, there were no differences in the percentage within the target zone (57.28% vs 53.40%, = .575), but rTKA did result in a greater percentage for cases with preoperative valgus (71.42% vs 44.12%, = .031). Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Global-10 physical scores were statistically higher at both 3 ( = .016) and 6 months ( = .001) postoperatively for rTKA compared to mTKA performed by different surgeons.
Although experienced surgeons can achieve target limb alignment correction with similar frequency when comparing rTKA to mTKA for all cases, rTKA may achieve target limb alignment with more accuracy for preoperative valgus deformity.
Retrospective Cohort Study, Level III.
与手动全膝关节置换术(mTKA)相比,机器人辅助全膝关节置换术(rTKA)已被证明可减少对线异常的数量并改善假体位置。本研究的主要目的是比较rTKA与mTKA实现术后目标肢体对线和假体位置的频率。
对250例行初次全膝关节置换术的患者进行回顾性比较研究,由2名接受过 fellowship 培训的关节置换外科医生实施手术。外科医生A主要使用ROSA系统(捷迈邦美,印第安纳州华沙)进行rTKA(103例),较少使用传统器械进行mTKA(44例)。外科医生B仅进行mTKA(103例)。外科医生A的所有病例目标肢体对线为0°,外科医生B的内翻膝目标为2°内翻,外翻膝目标为0°。由2名阅片者进行影像学测量。目标区域设定为距预定义目标±2度。
比较不同外科医生进行的rTKA和mTKA时,目标区域内的百分比无差异(57.28%对53.40%,P = 0.575),但rTKA在术前外翻病例中的百分比更高(71.42%对44.12%,P = 0.031)。与不同外科医生进行的mTKA相比,rTKA术后3个月(P = 0.016)和6个月(P = 0.001)时患者报告的患者报告结局测量信息系统全球10项身体评分在统计学上更高。
尽管经验丰富的外科医生在比较rTKA与mTKA时,所有病例实现目标肢体对线矫正的频率相似,但rTKA对于术前外翻畸形可能更准确地实现目标肢体对线。
回顾性队列研究,III级。