Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.
Alix School of Medicine, Mayo Medical School, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA.
Bone Joint J. 2021 Jun;103-B(6 Supple A):74-80. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.103B6.BJJ-2020-2003.R1.
Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RA-TKA) is theoretically more accurate for component positioning than TKA performed with mechanical instruments (M-TKA). Furthermore, the ability to incorporate soft-tissue laxity data into the plan prior to bone resection should reduce variability between the planned polyethylene thickness and the final implanted polyethylene. The purpose of this study was to compare accuracy to plan for component positioning and precision, as demonstrated by deviation from plan for polyethylene insert thickness in measured-resection RA-TKA versus M-TKA.
A total of 220 consecutive primary TKAs between May 2016 and November 2018, performed by a single surgeon, were reviewed. Planned coronal plane component alignment and overall limb alignment were all 0° to the mechanical axis; tibial posterior slope was 2°; and polyethylene thickness was 9 mm. For RA-TKA, individual component position was adjusted to assist gap-balancing but planned coronal plane alignment for the femoral and tibial components and overall limb alignment remained 0 ± 3°; planned tibial posterior slope was 1.5°. Mean deviations from plan for each parameter were compared between groups for positioning and size and outliers were assessed.
In all, 103 M-TKAs and 96 RA-TKAs were included. In RA-TKA versus M-TKA, respectively: mean femoral positioning (0.9° (SD 1.2°) vs 1.7° (SD 1.1°)), mean tibial positioning (0.3° (SD 0.9°) vs 1.3° (SD 1.0°)), mean posterior tibial slope (-0.3° (SD 1.3°) vs 1.7° (SD 1.1°)), and mean mechanical axis limb alignment (1.0° (SD 1.7°) vs 2.7° (SD 1.9°)) all deviated significantly less from the plan (all p < 0.001); significantly fewer knees required a distal femoral recut (10 (10%) vs 22 (22%), p = 0.033); and deviation from planned polyethylene thickness was significantly less (1.4 mm (SD 1.6) vs 2.7 mm (SD 2.2), p < 0.001).
RA-TKA is significantly more accurate and precise in planning both component positioning and final polyethylene insert thickness. Future studies should investigate whether this increased accuracy and precision has an impact on clinical outcomes. The greater accuracy and reproducibility of RA-TKA may be important as precise new goals for component positioning are developed and can be further individualized to the patient. Cite this article: 2021;103-B(6 Supple A):74-80.
与使用机械仪器(M-TKA)进行的 TKA 相比,机器人辅助全膝关节置换术(RA-TKA)在组件定位方面理论上更准确。此外,在进行骨切除之前,将软组织松弛数据纳入计划中的能力应该可以减少计划聚乙烯厚度和最终植入聚乙烯厚度之间的差异。本研究的目的是比较 RA-TKA 与 M-TKA 之间测量切除的 RA-TKA 与计划相比,组件定位和精度的准确性,以聚乙烯插入物厚度的计划偏差来表示。
回顾了 2016 年 5 月至 2018 年 11 月期间由一位外科医生完成的 220 例连续原发性 TKA。计划的冠状面组件对准和整个肢体对准均为机械轴的 0°;胫骨后倾角为 2°;聚乙烯厚度为 9mm。对于 RA-TKA,单独调整组件位置以辅助间隙平衡,但股骨和胫骨组件的计划冠状面对准以及整个肢体对准仍保持 0±3°;计划胫骨后倾角为 1.5°。比较了两组之间每个参数的计划偏差,以评估定位和尺寸的偏差,并评估了异常值。
共纳入 103 例 M-TKA 和 96 例 RA-TKA。在 RA-TKA 与 M-TKA 相比,分别为:股骨定位的平均(0.9°(SD 1.2°)与 1.7°(SD 1.1°))、胫骨定位的平均(0.3°(SD 0.9°)与 1.3°(SD 1.0°))、胫骨后倾角的平均(-0.3°(SD 1.3°)与 1.7°(SD 1.1°))和机械轴肢体对准的平均(1.0°(SD 1.7°)与 2.7°(SD 1.9°))均显著小于计划(均 p<0.001);需要进行股骨远端再切割的膝关节明显减少(10(10%)与 22(22%),p=0.033);计划聚乙烯厚度的偏差明显更小(1.4mm(SD 1.6)与 2.7mm(SD 2.2),p<0.001)。
RA-TKA 在计划组件定位和最终聚乙烯插入物厚度方面的准确性和精确性明显更高。未来的研究应该调查这种增加的准确性和精确性是否对临床结果有影响。RA-TKA 的更高准确性和可重复性可能很重要,因为正在开发更精确的组件定位新目标,并且可以根据患者进一步个体化。
Benjamin R. Levine, MD, MSCE, Alan H. Daniels, MD, and Peter G. Whiteside, MD
本文由 Medscape 授权发布,未经允许不得转载。