Suppr超能文献

烧伤手部的前瞻性随机治疗:非手术治疗与手术治疗。初步报告。

Prospective randomized treatments for burned hands: nonoperative vs. operative. Preliminary report.

作者信息

Edstrom L E, Robson M C, Macchiaverna J R, Scala A D

出版信息

Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg. 1979;13(1):131-5. doi: 10.3109/02844317909013040.

Abstract

It has been suggested that deep partial-thickness burns of the hand which remain unhealed by 14 days should be excised and totally resurfaced. Controlled data supporting this suggestion is not available. Therefore, a prospective randomized study was performed on 222 burns of the hand to evaluate if excision and skin grafting had any advantage over conservative management. Full-thickness burns were eliminated from the series by excision and grafting them as soon as possible after the diagnosis had been made. To eliminate the very superficial burns, randomization did not take place until the wound had remained unhealed for ten days and would not heal for at least another week. In the two groups, the first ten days were managed similarly with topical antibacterials, escharotomies when necessary, and splinting in the "safe" position. Conservatively managed hands were treated with scarlet red gauze dressing as soon as all eschar had been removed. Those cases randomized into the excision and grafting group were operated upon approximately day 14. Physical therapy was the same in both groups except for the immediate period after grafting. Results were recorded by active and passive joint measurements and photographs on predetermined days throughout the study. In this study, spontaneous healing, taking as much as five weeks, gave acceptable results, comparable to excision and grafting performed at two weeks. The use of range of motion exercises, accurate splinting and pressure allowed optimal healing and prevented stiffness and contractures in both groups. There was no significant difference between the two treatment modalities.

摘要

有人提出,手部深Ⅱ度烧伤若14天仍未愈合,应进行切除并完全覆盖创面。但目前尚无支持这一建议的对照数据。因此,对222例手部烧伤患者进行了一项前瞻性随机研究,以评估切除植皮与保守治疗相比是否具有优势。一旦确诊,即尽快通过切除并植皮将全层烧伤从该系列中排除。为排除极浅度烧伤,直到伤口持续不愈合10天且至少再过一周仍无法愈合时才进行随机分组。在两组中,最初10天的处理方式相似,包括使用局部抗菌药物、必要时进行焦痂切开术以及将手部固定在“安全”位置。一旦所有焦痂清除,保守治疗的手部即用猩红热纱布敷料处理。随机分为切除植皮组的患者大约在第14天接受手术。除了植皮后的 immediate period(此处原文有误,推测可能是immediate period,意为“即刻阶段”)外,两组的物理治疗相同。在整个研究过程中的预定日期,通过主动和被动关节测量及拍照记录结果。在本研究中,长达五周的自然愈合取得了可接受的结果,与两周时进行的切除植皮效果相当。两组中使用关节活动度练习、精确的固定和压力均能实现最佳愈合,并预防僵硬和挛缩。两种治疗方式之间没有显著差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验