• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全动脉化与非全动脉化不停跳冠状动脉旁路移植术完全血运重建的倾向性评分匹配比较。

Propensity score-matched comparison of total arterial off- and on-pump coronary artery bypass with complete revascularization.

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Tokyo Women's Medical University Hospital, 8-1, Kawada-cho, Shinjuku, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Heart Vessels. 2024 Feb;39(2):175-184. doi: 10.1007/s00380-023-02317-x. Epub 2023 Sep 25.

DOI:10.1007/s00380-023-02317-x
PMID:37747541
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10784338/
Abstract

Little is known regarding the long-term (> 10 years) outcomes and risk factors of total arterial coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). This study evaluated the long-term outcomes and risk factors for all-cause mortality and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs) following total arterial on-pump CABG (ONCAB) or off-pump CABG (OPCAB) with complete revascularization. This retrospective cohort analysis enrolled patients with stable angina who underwent total arterial CABG with complete revascularization in our institute between July 2000 and June 2019. The endpoints were all-cause mortality and MACCE incidence, including a comparison between OPCAB and ONCAB. Long-term (10-year) outcomes were analyzed using propensity score-matched pairs, and risk factors were evaluated using univariate and multivariate analyses. Overall, 401 patients who underwent primary total arterial CABG were classified into the OPCAB (n = 269) and ONCAB (n = 132) groups. Using propensity score matching (PSM), 88 patients who underwent OPCAB were matched with 88 patients who underwent ONCAB. The mean follow-up period was 7.9 ± 6.3 years. No significant difference in all-cause mortality (hazard ratio, 1.04; 95% confidence interval, 0.53-2.04; p = 0.9138) and MACCE incidence (hazard ratio, 1.06; 95% confidence interval, 0.68-1.65; p = 0.7901) was observed between the two groups. Renal failure requiring dialysis was a significant risk factor for mortality (p < 0.0001) and MACCEs (p = 0.0003). Long-term outcomes of total arterial OPCAB and ONCAB with complete revascularization showed similar findings using PSM. Renal failure requiring dialysis was a significant risk factor for mortality and morbidity.Journal standard instruction requires an unstructured abstract; hence the headings provided in abstract were deleted. Kindly check and confirm.Thank you for your kindness.Clinical registration number 5598, Tokyo Women's Medical University Hospital.

摘要

关于全动脉冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)的长期(>10 年)结果和危险因素知之甚少。本研究评估了在我院接受完全血运重建的全动脉体外循环 CABG(ONCAB)或非体外循环 CABG(OPCAB)后全因死亡率和主要心脏和脑血管不良事件(MACCE)的长期结果和危险因素。本回顾性队列分析纳入了 2000 年 7 月至 2019 年 6 月期间在我院接受完全血运重建的稳定型心绞痛患者。终点是全因死亡率和 MACCE 发生率,包括 OPCAB 和 ONCAB 之间的比较。使用倾向评分匹配对进行长期(10 年)结果分析,并使用单变量和多变量分析评估危险因素。共有 401 例患者接受了原发性全动脉 CABG,分为 OPCAB(n=269)和 ONCAB(n=132)组。使用倾向评分匹配(PSM),将 88 例接受 OPCAB 的患者与 88 例接受 ONCAB 的患者进行匹配。平均随访时间为 7.9±6.3 年。两组之间全因死亡率(危险比,1.04;95%置信区间,0.53-2.04;p=0.9138)和 MACCE 发生率(危险比,1.06;95%置信区间,0.68-1.65;p=0.7901)无显著差异。需要透析的肾衰竭是死亡(p<0.0001)和 MACCE(p=0.0003)的显著危险因素。使用 PSM,完全血运重建的全动脉 OPCAB 和 ONCAB 的长期结果显示出相似的发现。需要透析的肾衰竭是死亡和发病率的显著危险因素。

临床注册号 5598,东京女子医科大学医院。

相似文献

1
Propensity score-matched comparison of total arterial off- and on-pump coronary artery bypass with complete revascularization.全动脉化与非全动脉化不停跳冠状动脉旁路移植术完全血运重建的倾向性评分匹配比较。
Heart Vessels. 2024 Feb;39(2):175-184. doi: 10.1007/s00380-023-02317-x. Epub 2023 Sep 25.
2
Impact of multiple arterial grafts in off-pump and on-pump coronary artery bypass surgery.非体外循环与体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术中多支动脉桥的影响。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017 Feb;153(2):300-309.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.10.084. Epub 2016 Nov 16.
3
Risk-adjusted analysis of long-term outcomes after on- versus off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.风险调整后分析非体外循环与体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术的长期结果。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2021 Nov 22;33(6):857-865. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivab179.
4
Off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in moderate renal failure.非体外循环与体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术在中度肾功能衰竭中的比较。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020 Apr;159(4):1297-1304.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2019.03.142. Epub 2019 Jun 18.
5
Significance of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting compared with percutaneous coronary intervention: a propensity score analysis.非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的意义:倾向评分分析。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012 Jan;41(1):94-101. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2011.04.004.
6
CABG: To CBP or Not To CBP - A Propensity Score Matched Survival.冠状动脉旁路移植术:是否采用体外循环——倾向评分匹配生存分析
Rev Port Cir Cardiotorac Vasc. 2017 Jul-Dec;24(3-4):102.
7
[Comparison on the long-term outcomes post percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting for bifurcation lesions in unprotected left main coronary artery].[经皮冠状动脉介入治疗或冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗无保护左主干冠状动脉分叉病变的长期预后比较]
Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2017 Jan 25;45(1):19-25. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3758.2017.01.005.
8
Off-pump coronary artery bypass in octogenarians: results of a statewide, matched comparison.八旬老人非体外循环冠状动脉搭桥术:一项全州范围匹配对照研究的结果
Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019 Apr;67(4):355-362. doi: 10.1007/s11748-018-1025-8. Epub 2018 Oct 19.
9
Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting for patients with severely reduced ventricular function-A justified strategy?非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗严重左心室功能障碍患者:一种合理的策略?
J Card Surg. 2022 Jan;37(1):7-17. doi: 10.1111/jocs.15259. Epub 2021 Feb 5.
10
Off-pump versus on-pump coronary revascularization: meta-analysis of mid- and long-term outcomes.非体外循环与体外循环冠状动脉血运重建术:中长期结果的荟萃分析
Ann Thorac Surg. 2014 Aug;98(2):563-72. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.05.003. Epub 2014 Jun 24.

本文引用的文献

1
The effect of ejection fraction on mortality in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG) patients.射血分数对冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)患者死亡率的影响。
Pak J Med Sci. 2020 Nov-Dec;36(7):1454-1459. doi: 10.12669/pjms.36.7.3266.
2
Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with three-vessel or left main coronary artery disease: 10-year follow-up of the multicentre randomised controlled SYNTAX trial.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗三血管病变或左主干病变患者:多中心随机对照 SYNTAX 试验 10 年随访结果。
Lancet. 2019 Oct 12;394(10206):1325-1334. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31997-X. Epub 2019 Sep 2.
3
Bilateral versus Single Internal-Thoracic-Artery Grafts at 10 Years.
双侧与单根胸廓内动脉桥在 10 年时的比较。
N Engl J Med. 2019 Jan 31;380(5):437-446. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1808783.
4
Five-Year Outcomes after On-Pump and Off-Pump Coronary-Artery Bypass.心脏不停跳与心脏停跳冠状动脉旁路移植术 5 年后的结果。
N Engl J Med. 2017 Aug 17;377(7):623-632. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1614341.
5
Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting With and Without Manipulation of the Ascending Aorta: A Network Meta-Analysis.冠状动脉旁路移植术联合与不联合升主动脉操作:一项网状 Meta 分析。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Feb 28;69(8):924-936. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.11.071.
6
Five-Year Outcomes after Off-Pump or On-Pump Coronary-Artery Bypass Grafting.非体外循环与体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术 5 年结果。
N Engl J Med. 2016 Dec 15;375(24):2359-2368. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1601564. Epub 2016 Oct 23.
7
CABG Versus PCI: Greater Benefit in Long-Term Outcomes With Multiple Arterial Bypass Grafting.冠状动脉搭桥术与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:多支动脉搭桥术在长期预后方面具有更大益处。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Sep 29;66(13):1417-27. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.07.060.
8
Outcomes after complete versus incomplete revascularization of patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis of 89,883 patients enrolled in randomized clinical trials and observational studies.多支血管病变患者完全血运重建与不完全血运重建的结局比较:随机临床试验和观察性研究中 89883 例患者的荟萃分析。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Oct 15;62(16):1421-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.05.033. Epub 2013 Jun 7.
9
Early and long-term patency of in situ skeletonized gastroepiploic artery after off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery.非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术后原位骨骼化胃网膜动脉的早期和长期通畅率。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2013 Jul;96(1):90-5. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.04.018. Epub 2013 May 31.
10
Off-pump versus on-pump coronary-artery bypass grafting in elderly patients.非体外循环与体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术在老年患者中的比较。
N Engl J Med. 2013 Mar 28;368(13):1189-98. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1211666. Epub 2013 Mar 11.