• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

受糖尿病足影响人群的生活质量患者报告结局测量指标:心理测量系统评价。

Patient-Reported Outcome Measures of Quality of Life in People Affected by Diabetic Foot: A Psychometric Systematic Review.

机构信息

Nursing Department, Faculty of Nursing, Universitat de Girona, Girona, Spain.

Sant Pau Nursing School University, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Value Health. 2022 Sep;25(9):1602-1618. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2022.04.1737. Epub 2022 Jun 1.

DOI:10.1016/j.jval.2022.04.1737
PMID:35659485
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This psychometric systematic review aimed to identify the most suitable patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) of quality of life (QoL) in people affected by diabetic foot.

METHODS

We performed a literature search in MEDLINE (PubMed), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), and PsycINFO (EBSCOhost) databases from inception to February 1, 2022. We also searched gray literature databases. Eligible studies were full-text reports developing a QoL condition-specific PROM or assessing one or more of its measurement properties in people affected by diabetic foot. We assessed the methodological quality of included studies independently using the "Consensus-Based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments Risk of Bias" checklist. The measurement properties were evaluated using specific criteria. We graded the quality of the evidence using a "Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation" approach modified by Consensus-Based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments.

RESULTS

Forty-three reports (46 studies) providing information on the measurement properties of 10 different PROMs were included. We did not identify any instruments that could be recommended for use. We identified 2 PROMs that were not recommended for use and 8 that were potentially recommended but would require further investigation. Of these 8 PROMs, 4 had better evidence for content validity.

CONCLUSIONS

Available PROMs to measure QoL in people affected by diabetic foot have limited evidence for their measurement properties. There is no fully suitable PROM. Pending further evidence, 4 PROMs could potentially be recommended for use.

摘要

目的

本心理测量学系统评价旨在确定最适合患有糖尿病足人群的生活质量(QoL)的患者报告结局测量(PROM)。

方法

我们在 MEDLINE(PubMed)、CINAHL(EBSCOhost)和 PsycINFO(EBSCOhost)数据库中进行了文献检索,检索时间从建库至 2022 年 2 月 1 日。我们还检索了灰色文献数据库。符合条件的研究是全文报告,旨在开发特定于 QoL 的 PROM,或评估受糖尿病足影响人群的一种或多种其测量特性。我们使用“基于共识的健康测量仪器选择标准”清单独立评估纳入研究的方法学质量。使用特定标准评估测量特性。我们使用经“基于共识的健康测量仪器选择标准”修改的“推荐评估、制定和评估分级”方法来评估证据质量。

结果

共纳入 43 份报告(46 项研究),提供了 10 种不同 PROM 测量特性的信息。我们没有发现任何可以推荐使用的仪器。我们确定了 2 种不推荐使用的 PROM 和 8 种可能推荐但需要进一步研究的 PROM。在这 8 种 PROM 中,有 4 种在内容效度方面有更好的证据。

结论

目前用于测量糖尿病足患者生活质量的 PROM 其测量特性的证据有限。没有完全合适的 PROM。在进一步的证据出现之前,4 种 PROM 可能有潜在的使用价值。

相似文献

1
Patient-Reported Outcome Measures of Quality of Life in People Affected by Diabetic Foot: A Psychometric Systematic Review.受糖尿病足影响人群的生活质量患者报告结局测量指标:心理测量系统评价。
Value Health. 2022 Sep;25(9):1602-1618. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2022.04.1737. Epub 2022 Jun 1.
2
Evaluating patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for bladder cancer: a systematic review using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklist.评估膀胱癌患者报告结局测量指标(PROMs):使用共识基础的健康测量仪器选择标准(COSMIN)清单进行的系统评价。
BJU Int. 2018 Nov;122(5):760-773. doi: 10.1111/bju.14368. Epub 2018 Jun 8.
3
The suitability of patient-reported outcome measures used to assess the impact of hypoglycaemia on quality of life in people with diabetes: a systematic review using COSMIN methods.用于评估低血糖对糖尿病患者生活质量影响的患者报告结局测量工具的适用性:使用 COSMIN 方法的系统评价。
Diabetologia. 2021 Jun;64(6):1213-1225. doi: 10.1007/s00125-021-05382-x. Epub 2021 Feb 2.
4
Assessment of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Maternal Postpartum Depression Using the Consensus-Based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments Guideline: A Systematic Review.采用基于共识的健康测量仪器选择标准评估产妇产后抑郁症患者报告结局测量指标:系统评价。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jun 1;5(6):e2214885. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.14885.
5
Assessing quality of life in solid organ transplant recipients: A systematic review of the development, content, and quality of available condition- and transplant-specific patient-reported outcome measures.评估实体器官移植受者的生活质量:对现有疾病及移植特异性患者报告结局测量工具的开发、内容和质量的系统评价
Transplant Rev (Orlando). 2024 Apr;38(2):100836. doi: 10.1016/j.trre.2024.100836. Epub 2024 Feb 13.
6
Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients With Acne Vulgaris: A Systematic Review of Measure Development and Measurement Properties.患者报告的痤疮患者健康相关生活质量结局测量指标:测量开发和测量特性的系统评价。
JAMA Dermatol. 2022 Aug 1;158(8):900-911. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2022.2260.
7
HIV-Specific Reported Outcome Measures: Systematic Review of Psychometric Properties.HIV 特异性报告结局指标:心理计量学特性的系统评价。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2022 Dec 8;8(12):e39015. doi: 10.2196/39015.
8
Psychometric properties of patient-reported outcome measures for dysphagia in head and neck cancer: a systematic review protocol using COSMIN methodology.头颈部癌症患者吞咽障碍的患者报告结局测量量表的心理计量学特性:系统评价方案,使用 COSMIN 方法。
Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 15;11(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s13643-022-01903-w.
9
Evaluating measures of quality of life in adult scoliosis: a protocol for a systematic review and narrative synthesis.评价成人脊柱侧弯生活质量评估方法:系统评价和叙述性综合的方案。
Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 27;10(1):259. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01811-5.
10
Use of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures to Assess Outpatient Postpartum Recovery: A Systematic Review.使用患者报告结局测量评估门诊产后康复:系统评价。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 May 3;4(5):e2111600. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.11600.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient-Reported Experience (PREMs) and Outcome (PROMs) Measures in Diabetic Foot Disease Management-A Scoping Review.糖尿病足病管理中患者报告的体验(PREMs)和结局(PROMs)指标——一项范围综述
J Clin Med. 2025 Aug 29;14(17):6116. doi: 10.3390/jcm14176116.
2
Validity and reliability of the English version of the Diabetic Foot Self-Care Questionnaire: a cross-cultural adaptation.糖尿病足自我护理问卷英文版的有效性和可靠性:跨文化调适。
Front Public Health. 2024 Jan 24;11:1326439. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1326439. eCollection 2023.
3
Development of Patient-Reported Outcome Scale for Patients with Diabetic Foot and Its Reliability and Validity Test.
糖尿病足患者报告结局量表的研制及其信效度检验
Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2023 Sep 20;16:2921-2927. doi: 10.2147/DMSO.S419841. eCollection 2023.