Nursing Department, Faculty of Nursing, Universitat de Girona, Girona, Spain.
Sant Pau Nursing School University, Barcelona, Spain.
Value Health. 2022 Sep;25(9):1602-1618. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2022.04.1737. Epub 2022 Jun 1.
This psychometric systematic review aimed to identify the most suitable patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) of quality of life (QoL) in people affected by diabetic foot.
We performed a literature search in MEDLINE (PubMed), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), and PsycINFO (EBSCOhost) databases from inception to February 1, 2022. We also searched gray literature databases. Eligible studies were full-text reports developing a QoL condition-specific PROM or assessing one or more of its measurement properties in people affected by diabetic foot. We assessed the methodological quality of included studies independently using the "Consensus-Based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments Risk of Bias" checklist. The measurement properties were evaluated using specific criteria. We graded the quality of the evidence using a "Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation" approach modified by Consensus-Based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments.
Forty-three reports (46 studies) providing information on the measurement properties of 10 different PROMs were included. We did not identify any instruments that could be recommended for use. We identified 2 PROMs that were not recommended for use and 8 that were potentially recommended but would require further investigation. Of these 8 PROMs, 4 had better evidence for content validity.
Available PROMs to measure QoL in people affected by diabetic foot have limited evidence for their measurement properties. There is no fully suitable PROM. Pending further evidence, 4 PROMs could potentially be recommended for use.
本心理测量学系统评价旨在确定最适合患有糖尿病足人群的生活质量(QoL)的患者报告结局测量(PROM)。
我们在 MEDLINE(PubMed)、CINAHL(EBSCOhost)和 PsycINFO(EBSCOhost)数据库中进行了文献检索,检索时间从建库至 2022 年 2 月 1 日。我们还检索了灰色文献数据库。符合条件的研究是全文报告,旨在开发特定于 QoL 的 PROM,或评估受糖尿病足影响人群的一种或多种其测量特性。我们使用“基于共识的健康测量仪器选择标准”清单独立评估纳入研究的方法学质量。使用特定标准评估测量特性。我们使用经“基于共识的健康测量仪器选择标准”修改的“推荐评估、制定和评估分级”方法来评估证据质量。
共纳入 43 份报告(46 项研究),提供了 10 种不同 PROM 测量特性的信息。我们没有发现任何可以推荐使用的仪器。我们确定了 2 种不推荐使用的 PROM 和 8 种可能推荐但需要进一步研究的 PROM。在这 8 种 PROM 中,有 4 种在内容效度方面有更好的证据。
目前用于测量糖尿病足患者生活质量的 PROM 其测量特性的证据有限。没有完全合适的 PROM。在进一步的证据出现之前,4 种 PROM 可能有潜在的使用价值。