• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

将多基因和蛋白质组风险评分与临床危险因素相结合,以提高对新发胸痛患者无冠状动脉疾病的诊断性能。

Combining Polygenic and Proteomic Risk Scores With Clinical Risk Factors to Improve Performance for Diagnosing Absence of Coronary Artery Disease in Patients With de novo Chest Pain.

机构信息

Department of Biomedicine (P.L.M., M.N.), Aarhus University.

Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University (P.L.M., P.D.R., S.E.S., M.N.).

出版信息

Circ Genom Precis Med. 2023 Oct;16(5):442-451. doi: 10.1161/CIRCGEN.123.004053. Epub 2023 Sep 27.

DOI:10.1161/CIRCGEN.123.004053
PMID:37753640
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients with de novo chest pain, referred for evaluation of possible coronary artery disease (CAD), frequently have an absence of CAD resulting in millions of tests not having any clinical impact. The objective of this study was to investigate whether polygenic risk scores and targeted proteomics improve the prediction of absence of CAD in patients with suspected CAD, when added to the PROMISE (Prospective Multicenter Imaging Study for Evaluation of Chest Pain) minimal risk score (PMRS).

METHODS

Genotyping and targeted plasma proteomics (N=368 proteins) were performed in 1440 patients with symptoms suspected to be caused by CAD undergoing coronary computed tomography angiography. Based on individual genotypes, a polygenic risk score for CAD (PRS) was calculated. The prediction was performed using combinations of PRS, proteins, and PMRS as features in models using stability selection and machine learning.

RESULTS

Prediction of absence of CAD yielded an area under the curve of PRS-model, 0.64±0.03; proteomic-model, 0.58±0.03; and PMRS model, 0.76±0.02. No significant correlation was found between the genetic and proteomic risk scores (Pearson correlation coefficient, -0.04; =0.13). Optimal predictive ability was achieved by the full model (PRS+protein+PMRS) yielding an area under the curve of 0.80±0.02 for absence of CAD, significantly better than the PMRS model alone (<0.001). For reclassification purpose, the full model enabled down-classification of 49% (324 of 661) of the 5% to 15% pretest probability patients and 18% (113 of 611) of >15% pretest probability patients.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with chest pain and low-intermediate CAD risk, incorporating targeted proteomics and polygenic risk scores into the risk assessment substantially improved the ability to predict the absence of CAD. Genetics and proteomics seem to add complementary information to the clinical risk factors and improve risk stratification in this large patient group.

REGISTRATION

URL: https://www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov; Unique identifier: NCT02264717.

摘要

背景

新发胸痛患者,因疑似冠心病(CAD)而接受评估,常因不存在 CAD 而进行大量无临床意义的检查。本研究旨在探讨在加入 PROMISE(前瞻性多中心影像学评估胸痛研究)最小风险评分(PMRS)后,多基因风险评分和靶向蛋白质组学是否能改善疑似 CAD 患者中 CAD 缺失的预测。

方法

对 1440 例因疑似 CAD 而行冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影术的患者进行基因分型和靶向血浆蛋白质组学(368 种蛋白)检测。根据个体基因型,计算 CAD 的多基因风险评分(PRS)。使用稳定性选择和机器学习的模型,以 PRS、蛋白和 PMRS 作为特征,组合进行预测。

结果

CAD 缺失的预测结果显示,PRS 模型的曲线下面积为 0.64±0.03,蛋白质组学模型为 0.58±0.03,PMRS 模型为 0.76±0.02。遗传和蛋白质组学风险评分之间无显著相关性(Pearson 相关系数,-0.04;=0.13)。最佳预测能力由全模型(PRS+蛋白+PMRS)获得,CAD 缺失的曲线下面积为 0.80±0.02,明显优于 PMRS 模型(<0.001)。为了重新分类的目的,全模型可将 5%至 15%的低至中危患者的 49%(324/661)下分类,>15%的高风险患者的 18%(113/611)下分类。

结论

对于胸痛且 CAD 风险低的患者,将靶向蛋白质组学和多基因风险评分纳入风险评估中,显著提高了预测 CAD 缺失的能力。遗传学和蛋白质组学似乎为临床危险因素补充了互补信息,并改善了该大患者群体的风险分层。

注册

网址:https://www.。

临床试验

gov;独特标识符:NCT02264717。

相似文献

1
Combining Polygenic and Proteomic Risk Scores With Clinical Risk Factors to Improve Performance for Diagnosing Absence of Coronary Artery Disease in Patients With de novo Chest Pain.将多基因和蛋白质组风险评分与临床危险因素相结合,以提高对新发胸痛患者无冠状动脉疾病的诊断性能。
Circ Genom Precis Med. 2023 Oct;16(5):442-451. doi: 10.1161/CIRCGEN.123.004053. Epub 2023 Sep 27.
2
Polygenic Risk Score-Enhanced Risk Stratification of Coronary Artery Disease in Patients With Stable Chest Pain.多基因风险评分增强稳定型胸痛患者冠状动脉疾病的风险分层。
Circ Genom Precis Med. 2021 Jun;14(3):e003298. doi: 10.1161/CIRCGEN.120.003298. Epub 2021 May 25.
3
Predicting the presence of coronary plaques featuring high-risk characteristics using polygenic risk scores and targeted proteomics in patients with suspected coronary artery disease.利用多基因风险评分和靶向蛋白质组学预测疑似冠心病患者中具有高危特征的冠状动脉斑块的存在。
Genome Med. 2024 Mar 20;16(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s13073-024-01313-8.
4
The PROMISE Minimal Risk Score Improves Risk Classification of Symptomatic Patients With Suspected CAD.PROMISE 最小风险评分可改善疑似 CAD 症状患者的风险分类。
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2022 Aug;15(8):1442-1454. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2022.03.009. Epub 2022 May 11.
5
Associations of a polygenic risk score with coronary artery disease phenotypes in the Prospective Multicenter Imaging Study for Evaluation of Chest Pain (PROMISE) trial.多基因风险评分与前瞻性多中心影像学研究评估胸痛试验(PROMISE)中冠心病表型的相关性。
Am Heart J. 2022 Oct;252:12-15. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2022.05.012. Epub 2022 May 21.
6
Predictive Model for High-Risk Coronary Artery Disease.高危冠状动脉疾病预测模型。
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 Feb;12(2):e007940. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.118.007940.
7
Physician judgement in predicting obstructive coronary artery disease and adverse events in chest pain patients.医生对胸痛患者阻塞性冠状动脉疾病和不良事件的预测判断。
Heart. 2022 May 12;108(11):860-867. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2021-320275.
8
The External Validity of Prediction Models for the Diagnosis of Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease in Patients With Stable Chest Pain: Insights From the PROMISE Trial.稳定型胸痛患者阻塞性冠状动脉疾病诊断预测模型的外部有效性:来自 PROMISE 试验的见解。
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018 Mar;11(3):437-446. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2017.02.020. Epub 2017 Jun 14.
9
A Comparison of the Updated Diamond-Forrester, CAD Consortium, and CONFIRM History-Based Risk Scores for Predicting Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease in Patients With Stable Chest Pain: The SCOT-HEART Coronary CTA Cohort.更新后的 Diamond-Forrester、CAD 联合会和 CONFIRM 基于病史的风险评分在预测稳定型胸痛患者中阻塞性冠状动脉疾病的比较:SCOT-HEART 冠状动脉 CTA 队列研究。
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 Jul;12(7 Pt 2):1392-1400. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.02.020. Epub 2018 Apr 18.
10
Detection of significant coronary artery disease by noninvasive anatomical and functional imaging.通过非侵入性解剖和功能成像检测显著冠状动脉疾病。
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015 Mar;8(3). doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.114.002179.

引用本文的文献

1
Cross-biobank generalizability and accuracy of electronic health record-based predictors compared to polygenic scores.与多基因评分相比,基于电子健康记录的预测指标在跨生物样本库中的通用性和准确性。
Nat Genet. 2025 Aug 27. doi: 10.1038/s41588-025-02298-9.
2
Large-scale evaluation of proteomic and polygenic risk scores reveals complementary contributions to incident disease prediction.蛋白质组学和多基因风险评分的大规模评估揭示了对疾病发病预测的互补作用。
medRxiv. 2025 Jul 11:2025.07.10.25331242. doi: 10.1101/2025.07.10.25331242.
3
Bridging Genomics to Cardiology Clinical Practice: Artificial Intelligence in Optimizing Polygenic Risk Scores: A Systematic Review.
将基因组学与心脏病临床实践相联系:人工智能在优化多基因风险评分中的应用:一项系统综述
JACC Adv. 2025 Jun;4(6 Pt 2):101803. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.101803.
4
Plasma protein-based and polygenic risk scores serve complementary roles in predicting inflammatory bowel disease.基于血浆蛋白和多基因风险评分在预测炎症性肠病中发挥着互补作用。
Pac Symp Biocomput. 2025;30:522-534. doi: 10.1142/9789819807024_0037.
5
Identification of Genetic Loci Associated With Intracerebral Hemorrhage Using a Multitrait Analysis Approach.利用多性状分析方法鉴定与脑出血相关的遗传位点。
Neurology. 2024 Oct 22;103(8):e209666. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000209666. Epub 2024 Sep 19.
6
A plasma protein-based risk score to predict hip fractures.基于血浆蛋白的风险评分预测髋部骨折。
Nat Aging. 2024 Aug;4(8):1064-1075. doi: 10.1038/s43587-024-00639-7. Epub 2024 May 27.