• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

匈牙利新生儿囊性纤维化筛查——第一年经验

Neonatal Screening for Cystic Fibrosis in Hungary-First-Year Experiences.

作者信息

Xue Andrea, Lénárt István, Kincs Judit, Szabó Hajnalka, Párniczky Andrea, Balogh István, Deák Anna, Monostori Péter Béla, Hegedűs Krisztina, Szabó Attila J, Szatmári Ildikó

机构信息

Paediatric Centre, MTA Centre of Excellence, Semmelweis University, 1083 Budapest, Hungary.

Department of Paediatrics, Albert Szent-Györgyi Medical School, University of Szeged, 6725 Szeged, Hungary.

出版信息

Int J Neonatal Screen. 2023 Aug 23;9(3):47. doi: 10.3390/ijns9030047.

DOI:10.3390/ijns9030047
PMID:37754773
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10531581/
Abstract

The aim of this study is to evaluate the strategy of the cystic fibrosis newborn screening (CFNBS) programme in Hungary based on the results of the first year of screening. A combined immunoreactive trypsinogen (IRT) and pancreatitis-associated protein (PAP) CFNBS protocol (IRT/IRT×PAP/IRT) was applied with an IRT-dependent safety net (SN). Out of 88,400 newborns, 256 were tested screen-positive. Fourteen cystic fibrosis (CF) and two cystic fibrosis-positive inconclusive diagnosis (CFSPID) cases were confirmed from the screen-positive cases, and two false-negative cases were diagnosed later. Based on the obtained results, a sensitivity of 88% and a positive predictive value (PPV) of 5.9% were calculated. Following the recognition of false-negative cases, the calculation method of the age-dependent cut-off was changed. In purely biochemical CFNBS protocols, a small protocol change, even after a short period, can have a significant positive impact on the performance. CFNBS should be monitored continuously in order to fine-tune the screening strategy and define the best local practices.

摘要

本研究旨在根据匈牙利囊性纤维化新生儿筛查(CFNBS)项目第一年的筛查结果,对其策略进行评估。采用了联合免疫反应性胰蛋白酶原(IRT)和胰腺炎相关蛋白(PAP)的CFNBS方案(IRT/IRT×PAP/IRT),并设置了基于IRT的安全网(SN)。在88400名新生儿中,256名检测为筛查阳性。从筛查阳性病例中确诊了14例囊性纤维化(CF)和2例囊性纤维化阳性不确定诊断(CFSPID)病例,后来又诊断出2例假阴性病例。根据所得结果,计算出灵敏度为88%,阳性预测值(PPV)为5.9%。在识别出假阴性病例后,改变了年龄依赖性临界值的计算方法。在纯生化CFNBS方案中,即使在短时间后进行小的方案改变,也可能对性能产生显著的积极影响。应持续监测CFNBS,以便微调筛查策略并确定最佳的本地做法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d03/10531581/139014c6ad37/IJNS-09-00047-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d03/10531581/a602fdd1516d/IJNS-09-00047-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d03/10531581/dd844f9fb3c4/IJNS-09-00047-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d03/10531581/139014c6ad37/IJNS-09-00047-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d03/10531581/a602fdd1516d/IJNS-09-00047-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d03/10531581/dd844f9fb3c4/IJNS-09-00047-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d03/10531581/139014c6ad37/IJNS-09-00047-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Neonatal Screening for Cystic Fibrosis in Hungary-First-Year Experiences.匈牙利新生儿囊性纤维化筛查——第一年经验
Int J Neonatal Screen. 2023 Aug 23;9(3):47. doi: 10.3390/ijns9030047.
2
Final results of the southwest German pilot study on cystic fibrosis newborn screening - Evaluation of an IRT/PAP protocol with IRT-dependent safety net.西南德国囊性纤维化新生儿筛查试点研究的最终结果-IRT/PAP 方案与 IRT 依赖性安全网的评估。
J Cyst Fibros. 2022 May;21(3):422-433. doi: 10.1016/j.jcf.2021.10.007. Epub 2021 Nov 9.
3
Comparison of different IRT-PAP protocols to screen newborns for cystic fibrosis in three central European populations.比较三种中欧人群中不同的 IRT-PAP 方案用于新生儿囊性纤维化的筛查。
J Cyst Fibros. 2014 Jan;13(1):15-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jcf.2013.06.003. Epub 2013 Jul 25.
4
Five years of experience with biochemical cystic fibrosis newborn screening based on IRT/PAP in Germany.德国基于免疫反应性胰蛋白酶原(IRT)/胰蛋白酶原激活肽(PAP)进行的五年囊性纤维化新生儿生化筛查经验。
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2015 Jul;50(7):655-64. doi: 10.1002/ppul.23190. Epub 2015 Apr 23.
5
A product of immunoreactive trypsinogen and pancreatitis-associated protein as second-tier strategy in cystic fibrosis newborn screening.将免疫反应性胰蛋白酶原和胰腺炎相关蛋白作为囊性纤维化新生儿筛查的二线策略。
J Cyst Fibros. 2016 Nov;15(6):752-758. doi: 10.1016/j.jcf.2016.07.002. Epub 2016 Jul 22.
6
Evaluation of specificity and sensitivity of IRT/IRT protocol in the cystic fibrosis newborn screening program: 6-year experience of three tertiary centers.IRT/IRT方案在囊性纤维化新生儿筛查项目中的特异性和敏感性评估:三个三级中心的6年经验
Eur J Pediatr. 2023 Mar;182(3):1067-1076. doi: 10.1007/s00431-022-04766-4. Epub 2022 Dec 24.
7
Initial evaluation of a biochemical cystic fibrosis newborn screening by sequential analysis of immunoreactive trypsinogen and pancreatitis-associated protein (IRT/PAP) as a strategy that does not involve DNA testing in a Northern European population.对免疫反应性胰蛋白酶原和胰腺炎相关蛋白(IRT/PAP)连续分析在不涉及北欧人群 DNA 检测的情况下进行的生化囊性纤维化新生儿筛查的初步评估。
J Inherit Metab Dis. 2010 Oct;33(Suppl 2):S263-71. doi: 10.1007/s10545-010-9174-7. Epub 2010 Aug 17.
8
Initial Evaluation of Prospective and Parallel Assessments of Cystic Fibrosis Newborn Screening Protocols in Eastern Andalusia: IRT/IRT versus IRT/PAP/IRT.安达卢西亚东部囊性纤维化新生儿筛查方案的前瞻性与平行评估的初步评价:免疫反应性胰蛋白酶原检测/免疫反应性胰蛋白酶原检测(IRT/IRT)与免疫反应性胰蛋白酶原检测/苯丙氨酸氨肽酶检测/免疫反应性胰蛋白酶原检测(IRT/PAP/IRT)
Int J Neonatal Screen. 2019 Sep 3;5(3):32. doi: 10.3390/ijns5030032. eCollection 2019 Sep.
9
Comparison between two newborn screening strategies for cystic fibrosis in Argentina: IRT/IRT versus IRT/PAP.阿根廷两种新生儿囊性纤维化筛查策略的比较:IRT/IRT 与 IRT/PAP。
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2021 Jan;56(1):113-119. doi: 10.1002/ppul.25130. Epub 2020 Nov 2.
10
Optimization of performance of Dutch newborn screening for cystic fibrosis.荷兰新生儿囊性纤维化筛查性能的优化。
J Cyst Fibros. 2024 Jan;23(1):120-125. doi: 10.1016/j.jcf.2023.09.001. Epub 2023 Sep 15.

本文引用的文献

1
[Genetic revision of the Hungarian Cystic Fibrosis Registry].[匈牙利囊性纤维化登记处的基因修订]
Orv Hetil. 2022 Dec 18;163(51):2052-2059. doi: 10.1556/650.2022.32655.
2
Variation in cystic fibrosis newborn screening algorithms in the United States.美国囊性纤维化新生儿筛查算法的差异。
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2023 Mar;58(3):927-933. doi: 10.1002/ppul.26279. Epub 2022 Dec 16.
3
Missed Cystic Fibrosis Newborn Screening Cases due to Immunoreactive Trypsinogen Levels below Program Cutoffs: A National Survey of Risk Factors.
因免疫反应性胰蛋白酶原水平低于项目临界值导致的囊性纤维化新生儿筛查漏诊病例:一项全国性危险因素调查
Int J Neonatal Screen. 2022 Oct 27;8(4):58. doi: 10.3390/ijns8040058.
4
Immunoreactive trypsinogen in healthy newborns and infants with cystic fibrosis.健康新生儿和囊性纤维化婴儿中的免疫反应性胰蛋白酶原。
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2023 Mar;108(2):176-181. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2021-323549. Epub 2022 Sep 8.
5
Final results of the southwest German pilot study on cystic fibrosis newborn screening - Evaluation of an IRT/PAP protocol with IRT-dependent safety net.西南德国囊性纤维化新生儿筛查试点研究的最终结果-IRT/PAP 方案与 IRT 依赖性安全网的评估。
J Cyst Fibros. 2022 May;21(3):422-433. doi: 10.1016/j.jcf.2021.10.007. Epub 2021 Nov 9.
6
Cystic Fibrosis Newborn Screening in Austria Using PAP and the Numeric Product of PAP and IRT Concentrations as Second-Tier Parameters.奥地利使用胰蛋白酶原激活肽(PAP)以及PAP与免疫反应性胰蛋白酶(IRT)浓度的数值乘积作为二级参数进行囊性纤维化新生儿筛查。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Feb 13;11(2):299. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11020299.
7
Pancreatitis-Associated Protein in Neonatal Screening for Cystic Fibrosis: Strengths and Weaknesses.新生儿囊性纤维化筛查中的胰腺炎相关蛋白:优势与不足
Int J Neonatal Screen. 2020 Mar 30;6(2):28. doi: 10.3390/ijns6020028. eCollection 2020 Jun.
8
Processing Newborn Bloodspot Screening Results for CF.处理囊性纤维化的新生儿血斑筛查结果。
Int J Neonatal Screen. 2020 Mar 25;6(2):25. doi: 10.3390/ijns6020025. eCollection 2020 Jun.
9
Newborn Screening for CF across the Globe-?全球范围内的囊性纤维化新生儿筛查 -?
Int J Neonatal Screen. 2020 Mar 4;6(1):18. doi: 10.3390/ijns6010018. eCollection 2020 Mar.
10
Initial Evaluation of Prospective and Parallel Assessments of Cystic Fibrosis Newborn Screening Protocols in Eastern Andalusia: IRT/IRT versus IRT/PAP/IRT.安达卢西亚东部囊性纤维化新生儿筛查方案的前瞻性与平行评估的初步评价:免疫反应性胰蛋白酶原检测/免疫反应性胰蛋白酶原检测(IRT/IRT)与免疫反应性胰蛋白酶原检测/苯丙氨酸氨肽酶检测/免疫反应性胰蛋白酶原检测(IRT/PAP/IRT)
Int J Neonatal Screen. 2019 Sep 3;5(3):32. doi: 10.3390/ijns5030032. eCollection 2019 Sep.