Bourla Alexis, Mouchabac Stéphane, Lorimy Léonard, Crette Bertrand, Millet Bruno, Ferreri Florian
Department of Psychiatry, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, AP-HP, Sorbonne Université, 75012 Paris, France.
ICRIN Psychiatry (Infrastructure of Clinical Research In Neurosciences-Psychiatry), Brain Institute (ICM), Sorbonne Université, INSERM, CNRS, 75013 Paris, France.
Brain Sci. 2023 Aug 26;13(9):1246. doi: 10.3390/brainsci13091246.
The measurement of the motor threshold (MT) is an important element in determining stimulation intensity during Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation treatment (rTMS). The current recommendations propose its realization at least once a week. The variability in this motor threshold is an important factor to consider as it could translate certain neurophysiological specificities. We conducted a retrospective naturalistic study on data from 30 patients treated for treatment-resistant depression in an rTMS-specialized center. For each patient, weekly motor-evoked potential (MEP) was performed and several clinical elements were collected as part of our clinical interviews. Regarding response to treatment (Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) before and after treatment), there was a mean difference of -8.88 (-21 to 0) in PHQ9 in the Theta Burst group, of -9.00 (-18 to -1) in the High-Frequency (10 Hz) group, and of -4.66 (-10 to +2) in the Low-Frequency (1 Hz) group. The mean improvement in depressive symptoms was 47% ( < 0.001, effect-size: 1.60). The motor threshold changed over the course of the treatment, with a minimum individual range of 1 point and a maximum of 19 points (total subset), and a greater concentration in the remission group (4 to 10) than in the other groups (3 to 10 in the response group, 1 to 8 in the partial response group, 3 to 19 in the stagnation group). We also note that the difference between MT at week 1 and week 6 was statistically significant only in the remission group, with a different evolutionary profile showing an upward trend in MT. Our findings suggest a potential predictive value of MT changes during treatment, particularly an increase in MT in patients who achieve remission and a distinct "break" in MT around the 4th week, which could predict nonresponse.
运动阈值(MT)的测量是经颅磁刺激治疗(rTMS)期间确定刺激强度的重要因素。当前建议提出每周至少进行一次测量。该运动阈值的变异性是一个需要考虑的重要因素,因为它可能反映某些神经生理特异性。我们对一家rTMS专科中心治疗的30例难治性抑郁症患者的数据进行了一项回顾性自然主义研究。对每位患者进行每周一次的运动诱发电位(MEP)检查,并在临床访谈中收集了一些临床指标。关于治疗反应(治疗前后的患者健康问卷-9(PHQ-9)),θ爆发组的PHQ9平均差异为-8.88(-21至0),高频(10Hz)组为-9.00(-18至-1),低频(1Hz)组为-4.66(-10至+2)。抑郁症状的平均改善率为47%(<0.001,效应量:1.60)。运动阈值在治疗过程中发生变化,个体最小变化范围为1分,最大为19分(总子集),缓解组(4至10)的变化比其他组更集中(反应组为3至10,部分反应组为1至8,停滞组为3至19)。我们还注意到,仅在缓解组中,第1周和第6周的MT差异具有统计学意义,其不同的变化趋势显示MT呈上升趋势。我们的研究结果表明,治疗期间MT变化具有潜在的预测价值,特别是缓解患者的MT增加以及第4周左右MT出现明显“断点”,这可能预测无反应。