Suppr超能文献

经颅磁刺激治疗抑郁症期间运动阈值的变异性:神经生理学意义

Variability in Motor Threshold during Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Treatment for Depression: Neurophysiological Implications.

作者信息

Bourla Alexis, Mouchabac Stéphane, Lorimy Léonard, Crette Bertrand, Millet Bruno, Ferreri Florian

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, AP-HP, Sorbonne Université, 75012 Paris, France.

ICRIN Psychiatry (Infrastructure of Clinical Research In Neurosciences-Psychiatry), Brain Institute (ICM), Sorbonne Université, INSERM, CNRS, 75013 Paris, France.

出版信息

Brain Sci. 2023 Aug 26;13(9):1246. doi: 10.3390/brainsci13091246.

Abstract

The measurement of the motor threshold (MT) is an important element in determining stimulation intensity during Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation treatment (rTMS). The current recommendations propose its realization at least once a week. The variability in this motor threshold is an important factor to consider as it could translate certain neurophysiological specificities. We conducted a retrospective naturalistic study on data from 30 patients treated for treatment-resistant depression in an rTMS-specialized center. For each patient, weekly motor-evoked potential (MEP) was performed and several clinical elements were collected as part of our clinical interviews. Regarding response to treatment (Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) before and after treatment), there was a mean difference of -8.88 (-21 to 0) in PHQ9 in the Theta Burst group, of -9.00 (-18 to -1) in the High-Frequency (10 Hz) group, and of -4.66 (-10 to +2) in the Low-Frequency (1 Hz) group. The mean improvement in depressive symptoms was 47% ( < 0.001, effect-size: 1.60). The motor threshold changed over the course of the treatment, with a minimum individual range of 1 point and a maximum of 19 points (total subset), and a greater concentration in the remission group (4 to 10) than in the other groups (3 to 10 in the response group, 1 to 8 in the partial response group, 3 to 19 in the stagnation group). We also note that the difference between MT at week 1 and week 6 was statistically significant only in the remission group, with a different evolutionary profile showing an upward trend in MT. Our findings suggest a potential predictive value of MT changes during treatment, particularly an increase in MT in patients who achieve remission and a distinct "break" in MT around the 4th week, which could predict nonresponse.

摘要

运动阈值(MT)的测量是经颅磁刺激治疗(rTMS)期间确定刺激强度的重要因素。当前建议提出每周至少进行一次测量。该运动阈值的变异性是一个需要考虑的重要因素,因为它可能反映某些神经生理特异性。我们对一家rTMS专科中心治疗的30例难治性抑郁症患者的数据进行了一项回顾性自然主义研究。对每位患者进行每周一次的运动诱发电位(MEP)检查,并在临床访谈中收集了一些临床指标。关于治疗反应(治疗前后的患者健康问卷-9(PHQ-9)),θ爆发组的PHQ9平均差异为-8.88(-21至0),高频(10Hz)组为-9.00(-18至-1),低频(1Hz)组为-4.66(-10至+2)。抑郁症状的平均改善率为47%(<0.001,效应量:1.60)。运动阈值在治疗过程中发生变化,个体最小变化范围为1分,最大为19分(总子集),缓解组(4至10)的变化比其他组更集中(反应组为3至10,部分反应组为1至8,停滞组为3至19)。我们还注意到,仅在缓解组中,第1周和第6周的MT差异具有统计学意义,其不同的变化趋势显示MT呈上升趋势。我们的研究结果表明,治疗期间MT变化具有潜在的预测价值,特别是缓解患者的MT增加以及第4周左右MT出现明显“断点”,这可能预测无反应。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3602/10526536/bd66bf086aeb/brainsci-13-01246-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验