• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

传统创伤和损伤严重程度评分及新开发的钝性创伤儿科患者生存预测模型的验证:一项全国性观察研究

Validation of the Conventional Trauma and Injury Severity Score and a Newly Developed Survival Predictive Model in Pediatric Patients with Blunt Trauma: A Nationwide Observation Study.

作者信息

Toida Chiaki, Muguruma Takashi, Gakumazawa Masayasu, Shinohara Mafumi, Abe Takeru, Takeuchi Ichiro

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo 173-8606, Japan.

Department of Emergency Medicine, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama 232-0024, Japan.

出版信息

Children (Basel). 2023 Sep 12;10(9):1542. doi: 10.3390/children10091542.

DOI:10.3390/children10091542
PMID:37761503
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10529461/
Abstract

To date, there is no clinically useful prediction model that is suitable for Japanese pediatric trauma patients. Herein, this study aimed to developed a model for predicting the survival of Japanese pediatric patients with blunt trauma and compare its validity with that of the conventional TRISS model. Patients registered in the Japan Trauma Data Bank were grouped into a derivation cohort (2009-2013) and validation cohort (2014-2018). Logistic regression analysis was performed using the derivation dataset to establish prediction models using age, injury severity, and physiology. The validity of the modified model was evaluated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Among 11 predictor models, Model 1 and Model 11 had the best performance (AUC = 0.980). The AUC of all models was lower in patients with survival probability Ps < 0.5 than in patients with Ps ≥ 0.5. The AUC of all models was lower in neonates/infants than in other age categories. Model 11 also had the best performance (AUC = 0.762 and 0.909, respectively) in patients with Ps < 0.5 and neonates/infants. The predictive ability of the newly modified models was not superior to that of the current TRISS model. Our results may be useful to develop a highly accurate prediction model based on the new predictive variables and cutoff values associated with the survival mortality of injured Japanese pediatric patients who are younger and more severely injured by using a nationwide dataset with fewer missing data and added valuables, which can be used to evaluate the age-related physiological and anatomical severity of injured patients.

摘要

迄今为止,尚无适用于日本儿科创伤患者的临床实用预测模型。在此,本研究旨在开发一种预测日本钝性创伤儿科患者生存情况的模型,并将其有效性与传统的TRISS模型进行比较。在日本创伤数据库中登记的患者被分为推导队列(2009 - 2013年)和验证队列(2014 - 2018年)。使用推导数据集进行逻辑回归分析,以建立使用年龄、损伤严重程度和生理指标的预测模型。通过受试者操作特征曲线下面积(AUC)评估改良模型的有效性。在11个预测模型中,模型1和模型11表现最佳(AUC = 0.980)。生存概率Ps < 0.5的患者中所有模型的AUC低于Ps≥0.5的患者。所有模型的AUC在新生儿/婴儿中低于其他年龄组。模型11在Ps < 0.5的患者和新生儿/婴儿中也分别表现最佳(AUC = 0.762和0.909)。新改良模型的预测能力并不优于当前的TRISS模型。我们的结果可能有助于基于新的预测变量和与受伤日本儿科患者生存死亡率相关的临界值开发高度准确的预测模型,这些患者年龄更小且损伤更严重,通过使用缺失数据较少且有附加价值的全国性数据集,可用于评估受伤患者与年龄相关的生理和解剖严重程度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5662/10529461/1663eba74c8d/children-10-01542-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5662/10529461/1663eba74c8d/children-10-01542-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5662/10529461/1663eba74c8d/children-10-01542-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Validation of the Conventional Trauma and Injury Severity Score and a Newly Developed Survival Predictive Model in Pediatric Patients with Blunt Trauma: A Nationwide Observation Study.传统创伤和损伤严重程度评分及新开发的钝性创伤儿科患者生存预测模型的验证:一项全国性观察研究
Children (Basel). 2023 Sep 12;10(9):1542. doi: 10.3390/children10091542.
2
Validation of age-specific survival prediction in pediatric patients with blunt trauma using trauma and injury severity score methodology: a ten-year Nationwide observational study.使用创伤和损伤严重程度评分方法对钝性创伤儿科患者进行年龄特异性生存预测的验证:一项为期十年的全国性观察性研究。
BMC Emerg Med. 2020 Nov 18;20(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s12873-020-00385-0.
3
Trauma survival prediction in Asian population: a modification of TRISS to improve accuracy.亚洲人群创伤生存预测:TRISS 修正以提高准确性。
Emerg Med J. 2014 Feb;31(2):126-33. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2012-201831. Epub 2013 Jan 12.
4
Modification of the Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS) method provides better survival prediction in Asian blunt trauma victims.改良创伤和损伤严重度评分(TRISS)方法能更好地预测亚洲钝器创伤患者的生存情况。
World J Surg. 2012 Apr;36(4):813-8. doi: 10.1007/s00268-012-1498-z.
5
External validation of a modified trauma and injury severity score model in major trauma injury.改良创伤和损伤严重度评分模型在严重创伤损伤中的外部验证。
Injury. 2019 May;50(5):1118-1124. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2018.12.031. Epub 2018 Dec 21.
6
The development of simple survival prediction models for blunt trauma victims treated at Asian emergency centers.亚洲急救中心救治的钝器创伤患者简单生存预测模型的开发。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2012 Feb 2;20:9. doi: 10.1186/1757-7241-20-9.
7
Factors associated with mortality in trauma: re-evaluation of the TRISS method using the National Trauma Data Bank.创伤死亡率相关因素:使用国家创伤数据库对TRISS方法进行重新评估。
J Trauma. 2004 May;56(5):1090-6. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000119689.81910.06.
8
The Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS) revised.创伤和损伤严重度评分(TRISS)修订版。
Injury. 2011 Jan;42(1):90-6. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2010.08.040.
9
Comparison of modified Kampala trauma score with trauma mortality prediction model and trauma-injury severity score: A National Trauma Data Bank Study.改良坎帕拉创伤评分与创伤死亡率预测模型及创伤损伤严重程度评分的比较:一项国家创伤数据库研究。
Am J Emerg Med. 2017 Aug;35(8):1056-1059. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2017.02.035. Epub 2017 Feb 16.
10
Validation of the Pediatric Physiological and Anatomical Triage Score in Injured Pediatric Patients.验证小儿生理与解剖分诊评分在受伤小儿患者中的应用。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2019 Aug;34(4):363-369. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X19004552. Epub 2019 Jul 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of nine trauma scoring systems in prediction of inhospital outcomes of pediatric trauma patients: a multicenter study.比较九种创伤评分系统在预测儿科创伤患者住院结局中的作用:一项多中心研究。
Sci Rep. 2024 Apr 1;14(1):7646. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-58373-4.

本文引用的文献

1
Pediatric trauma smackdown: PTS vs SIPA.小儿创伤大比拼:儿科创伤评分系统(PTS)与小儿损伤严重度评分(SIPA)
Injury. 2023 May;54(5):1297-1301. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2023.02.045. Epub 2023 Mar 2.
2
Performance of the Paediatric Trauma Score on survival prediction of injured children at a major trauma centre: A retrospective Colombian cohort, 2011-2019.儿科创伤评分对一家大型创伤中心受伤儿童生存预测的性能:一项2011 - 2019年哥伦比亚回顾性队列研究
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2022 Jun 29;13:100312. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2022.100312. eCollection 2022 Sep.
3
Trauma Scores and Their Prognostic Value for the Outcome Following Pediatric Polytrauma.
创伤评分及其对小儿多发伤预后的预测价值
Front Pediatr. 2021 Sep 3;9:721585. doi: 10.3389/fped.2021.721585. eCollection 2021.
4
Comparison of Trauma Severity Scores (ISS, NISS, RTS, BIG Score, and TRISS) in Multiple Trauma Patients.多发伤患者创伤严重评分(ISS、NISS、RTS、BIG 评分和 TRISS)比较。
J Trauma Nurs. 2021;28(2):100-106. doi: 10.1097/JTN.0000000000000567.
5
Evaluation of the Berlin polytrauma definition: A Dutch nationwide observational study.柏林多发伤定义的评估:一项荷兰全国性观察性研究。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2021 Apr 1;90(4):694-699. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003071.
6
Validation of age-specific survival prediction in pediatric patients with blunt trauma using trauma and injury severity score methodology: a ten-year Nationwide observational study.使用创伤和损伤严重程度评分方法对钝性创伤儿科患者进行年龄特异性生存预测的验证:一项为期十年的全国性观察性研究。
BMC Emerg Med. 2020 Nov 18;20(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s12873-020-00385-0.
7
Ten-Year in-Hospital Mortality Trends among Paediatric Injured Patients in Japan: A Nationwide Observational Study.日本儿科受伤患者的十年院内死亡率趋势:一项全国性观察研究。
J Clin Med. 2020 Oct 12;9(10):3273. doi: 10.3390/jcm9103273.
8
To what extent are GCS and AVPU equivalent to each other when assessing the level of consciousness of children with head injury? A cross-sectional study of UK hospital admissions.在评估头部受伤儿童的意识水平时,格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)和AVPU量表的等效程度如何?一项针对英国医院入院病例的横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2018 Nov 28;8(11):e023216. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023216.
9
Age-Related Characteristics and Outcomes for Patients With Severe Trauma: Analysis of Japan's Nationwide Trauma Registry.严重创伤患者的年龄相关特征和结局:日本全国创伤登记处的分析。
Ann Emerg Med. 2019 Mar;73(3):281-290. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2018.09.034. Epub 2018 Nov 15.
10
A survival prediction logistic regression models for blunt trauma victims in Japan.日本钝性创伤受害者的生存预测逻辑回归模型。
Acute Med Surg. 2016 Jul 19;4(1):52-56. doi: 10.1002/ams2.228. eCollection 2017 Jan.