Maccaro Alessia, Audia Camilla, Stokes Katy, Masud Haleema, Sekalala Sharifah, Pecchia Leandro, Piaggio Davide
School of Engineering, University of Warwick, Library Rd., Coventry CV4 7AL, UK.
Global Sustainable Development, School for Cross-Faculty Studies, University of Warwick, Library Rd., Coventry CV4 7AL, UK.
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Sep 18;11(18):2572. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11182572.
The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the scale of global unpreparedness to deal with the fast-arising needs of global health threats. This problem was coupled with a crisis of governance and presented in the context of globally hitting climate crisis and disasters. Although such a pandemic was predictable due to the known effects of human intervention on the surrounding environment and its devastating secondary effects, such as climate change and increased zoonoses, most countries were unprepared to deal with the scale and scope of the pandemic. In this context, such as that of the climate crisis, the Global North and Global South faced several common challenges, including, first and foremost, the scarcity of resources required for health, policy, wellbeing and socioeconomic wellness. In this paper, we review the most recent evidence available in the literature related to pandemic preparedness and governance, focusing on principles and practices used during the COVID-19 pandemic, and we place it in the context of a European Parliament Interest Group meeting (this event took place on 21 March 2023 during the "European Health Tech Summit") to ground it within ongoing discussions and narratives of policy and praxis. The review identified key practices and principles required to better face future health threats and emergencies. Beyond health practices relying on technology and innovation, it is useful to mention the importance of contextualising responses and linking them to clear goals, improving the agreement between science and policymaking, thus building trust and enabling transparent communication with the general public based on clear ethical frameworks.
新冠疫情凸显了全球在应对快速出现的全球卫生威胁需求方面准备不足的程度。这一问题与治理危机交织在一起,并呈现在全球气候危机和灾害的背景之下。尽管由于人类干预对周围环境的已知影响及其破坏性的次生影响,如气候变化和人畜共患病增加,这样的大流行是可预测的,但大多数国家仍未做好应对大流行规模和范围的准备。在这种背景下,就像在气候危机中一样,全球北方和全球南方面临着几个共同挑战,其中首要的是卫生、政策、福祉和社会经济健康所需资源的稀缺。在本文中,我们回顾了文献中与大流行防范和治理相关的最新证据,重点关注新冠疫情期间所采用的原则和做法,并将其置于欧洲议会利益集团会议(该活动于2023年3月21日在“欧洲健康科技峰会”期间举行)的背景下,以便将其置于正在进行的政策和实践讨论及叙述之中。该综述确定了更好应对未来卫生威胁和紧急情况所需的关键做法和原则。除了依靠技术和创新的卫生做法之外,提及将应对措施因地制宜并使其与明确目标相联系的重要性、改善科学与政策制定之间的一致性、从而建立信任并基于明确的道德框架与公众进行透明沟通也是很有必要的。
Healthcare (Basel). 2023-9-18
BMC Public Health. 2024-8-6
Health Res Policy Syst. 2025-3-26
Med J Aust. 2021-5
BMC Med Ethics. 2022-11-17
Western Pac Surveill Response J. 2025-7-4
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024-12-5
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024-9-19
Health Promot Int. 2022-8-1
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022-8-12
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022-5-28
Fam Med Community Health. 2022-4