Doctoral School, State University of Medicine and Pharmacy Nicolae Testemițanu, 2004 Chisinau, Moldova.
3rd Medical Sciences Department, Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iasi, Romania.
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Sep 4;59(9):1598. doi: 10.3390/medicina59091598.
Doctors should have full loyalty to their patients, while patients should be able to trust that physicians will act only in their best interests. However, doctors may be faced with situations where they must choose between the patient's interests and those of a third party. This article presents the results of a study that aimed to identify situations of duality in the decision-making process of medical workers, which can compromise their ethical behavior. A cross-sectional study was carried out on a sample of 1070 participants, employed in 120 healthcare facilities in the Republic of Moldova. An online questionnaire was completed anonymously. Descriptive statistics for discrete data were performed by estimating absolute and relative frequencies. To perform the multivariate analysis, the logistic regression was applied. A large number (74.4%) of respondents admitted that they had faced situations of conflicts of interest. Every third respondent (35.3%) had experienced ethical dilemmas when access to expensive treatments should be ensured. Every fourth respondent experienced a conflict between the patient's interests and those of the institution (26.1%) or the insurance company (23.3%). As age increases, the probability of reporting the dilemma decreases. Physicians reported such dilemmas almost 3 times more often than nurses. A low rate of staff sought support when faced with dilemmas. Half of the respondents (50.6%) preferred to discuss the problem only with a colleague, and 40.1% preferred to find solutions without anyone's help. There were significant gaps within organizations in terms of the ethical dimension of the decision-making process. Managers should adopt clear institutional policies and tools to identify and prevent situations of dual loyalty. Ethical support should be offered to employees facing such situations. The need to promote an institutional climate based on trust and openness becomes evident.
医生应该对患者保持完全忠诚,而患者应该能够相信医生只会为他们的最佳利益行事。然而,医生可能会面临必须在患者利益和第三方利益之间做出选择的情况。本文介绍了一项研究的结果,该研究旨在确定医疗工作者决策过程中的双重性情况,这些情况可能会损害他们的道德行为。
在摩尔多瓦共和国的 120 个医疗保健机构中,对 1070 名参与者进行了一项横断面研究。通过在线问卷匿名完成。对离散数据进行了描述性统计,通过估计绝对和相对频率来进行。为了进行多变量分析,应用了逻辑回归。
大多数(74.4%)受访者承认他们曾面临利益冲突的情况。每三个受访者(35.3%)在需要确保昂贵治疗的机会时曾经历过道德困境。每四个受访者中就有一个人经历过患者利益与机构(26.1%)或保险公司(23.3%)之间的冲突。随着年龄的增长,报告困境的可能性会降低。医生报告此类困境的可能性几乎是护士的 3 倍。当面临困境时,工作人员寻求支持的比例很低。一半的受访者(50.6%)更喜欢仅与同事讨论问题,而 40.1%的人更喜欢在没有任何人帮助的情况下找到解决方案。在决策过程的道德层面上,各组织之间存在明显差距。
管理者应采取明确的机构政策和工具来识别和预防双重忠诚的情况。应向面临这种情况的员工提供道德支持。显然需要促进基于信任和开放的机构氛围。