Suppr超能文献

医疗机构员工忠诚二元性所引发的潜在利益冲突——伦理管理的发现与工具。

Potential Conflicts of Interest Arising from Dualism of Loyalty Imposed on Employees of Medical Institutions-Findings and Tools for Ethics Management.

机构信息

Doctoral School, State University of Medicine and Pharmacy Nicolae Testemițanu, 2004 Chisinau, Moldova.

3rd Medical Sciences Department, Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iasi, Romania.

出版信息

Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Sep 4;59(9):1598. doi: 10.3390/medicina59091598.

Abstract

Doctors should have full loyalty to their patients, while patients should be able to trust that physicians will act only in their best interests. However, doctors may be faced with situations where they must choose between the patient's interests and those of a third party. This article presents the results of a study that aimed to identify situations of duality in the decision-making process of medical workers, which can compromise their ethical behavior. A cross-sectional study was carried out on a sample of 1070 participants, employed in 120 healthcare facilities in the Republic of Moldova. An online questionnaire was completed anonymously. Descriptive statistics for discrete data were performed by estimating absolute and relative frequencies. To perform the multivariate analysis, the logistic regression was applied. A large number (74.4%) of respondents admitted that they had faced situations of conflicts of interest. Every third respondent (35.3%) had experienced ethical dilemmas when access to expensive treatments should be ensured. Every fourth respondent experienced a conflict between the patient's interests and those of the institution (26.1%) or the insurance company (23.3%). As age increases, the probability of reporting the dilemma decreases. Physicians reported such dilemmas almost 3 times more often than nurses. A low rate of staff sought support when faced with dilemmas. Half of the respondents (50.6%) preferred to discuss the problem only with a colleague, and 40.1% preferred to find solutions without anyone's help. There were significant gaps within organizations in terms of the ethical dimension of the decision-making process. Managers should adopt clear institutional policies and tools to identify and prevent situations of dual loyalty. Ethical support should be offered to employees facing such situations. The need to promote an institutional climate based on trust and openness becomes evident.

摘要

医生应该对患者保持完全忠诚,而患者应该能够相信医生只会为他们的最佳利益行事。然而,医生可能会面临必须在患者利益和第三方利益之间做出选择的情况。本文介绍了一项研究的结果,该研究旨在确定医疗工作者决策过程中的双重性情况,这些情况可能会损害他们的道德行为。

在摩尔多瓦共和国的 120 个医疗保健机构中,对 1070 名参与者进行了一项横断面研究。通过在线问卷匿名完成。对离散数据进行了描述性统计,通过估计绝对和相对频率来进行。为了进行多变量分析,应用了逻辑回归。

大多数(74.4%)受访者承认他们曾面临利益冲突的情况。每三个受访者(35.3%)在需要确保昂贵治疗的机会时曾经历过道德困境。每四个受访者中就有一个人经历过患者利益与机构(26.1%)或保险公司(23.3%)之间的冲突。随着年龄的增长,报告困境的可能性会降低。医生报告此类困境的可能性几乎是护士的 3 倍。当面临困境时,工作人员寻求支持的比例很低。一半的受访者(50.6%)更喜欢仅与同事讨论问题,而 40.1%的人更喜欢在没有任何人帮助的情况下找到解决方案。在决策过程的道德层面上,各组织之间存在明显差距。

管理者应采取明确的机构政策和工具来识别和预防双重忠诚的情况。应向面临这种情况的员工提供道德支持。显然需要促进基于信任和开放的机构氛围。

相似文献

3
Conflicts of interest: research and clinical care.
Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 1994;8(Suppl. 4):49-57.
5
A Proposal to Address NFL Club Doctors' Conflicts of Interest and to Promote Player Trust.
Hastings Cent Rep. 2016 Nov;46 Suppl 2(Suppl Suppl 2):S2-S24. doi: 10.1002/hast.651.
7
Between professional values, social regulations and patient preferences: medical doctors' perceptions of ethical dilemmas.
J Med Ethics. 2018 Apr;44(4):239-243. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2017-104408. Epub 2017 Nov 18.
9
American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement: oversight of clinical research.
J Clin Oncol. 2003 Jun 15;21(12):2377-86. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.04.026. Epub 2003 Apr 29.
10
Conflicts of interest in research involving human beings.
J Int Bioethique. 2008 Mar-Jun;19(1-2):143-54, 202-3. doi: 10.3917/jib.191.0143.

引用本文的文献

1
Dual loyalty conflicts for industrial psychiatrists.
Ind Psychiatry J. 2024 Jul-Dec;33(2):414-415. doi: 10.4103/ipj.ipj_354_24. Epub 2024 Dec 17.

本文引用的文献

2
Conflicts of interest in medicine. CETREMI recommendations.
Gac Med Mex. 2019;155(5):519-520. doi: 10.24875/GMM.M20000343.
3
Competing and conflicting interests in the care of critically ill patients.
Intensive Care Med. 2018 Oct;44(10):1628-1637. doi: 10.1007/s00134-018-5326-2. Epub 2018 Jul 25.
4
The Commercialization of Patient-Related Decision Making in Hospitals.
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2017 Nov 24;114(47):797-804. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2017.0797.
5
Clinical Ethics Support for Healthcare Personnel: An Integrative Literature Review.
HEC Forum. 2017 Dec;29(4):313-346. doi: 10.1007/s10730-017-9325-4.
6
Why There Are No "Potential" Conflicts of Interest.
JAMA. 2017 May 2;317(17):1721-1722. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.2308.
7
Conflict of Interest in Medicine.
JAMA. 2017 May 2;317(17):1812. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.4044.
8
Accounting for Patient Preferences Regarding Life-Sustaining Treatment in Evaluations of Medical Effectiveness and Quality.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017 Oct 15;196(8):958-963. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201701-0165CP.
9
Beyond 30-day mortality: aligning surgical quality with outcomes that patients value.
JAMA Surg. 2014 Jul;149(7):631-2. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2013.5143.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验