Feng Yuyan, Wu Xiaoting, Hu Dan, Wang Canyang, Chen Qu, Ni Yingdong
Key Laboratory of Animal Physiology & Biochemistry, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China.
State Key Laboratory for Managing Biotic and Chemical Threats to the Quality and Safety of Agro-Products, Institute of Agro-Product Safety and Nutrition, Zhejiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hangzhou 310021, China.
Microorganisms. 2023 Sep 13;11(9):2308. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11092308.
This study was devoted to the comparison of the probiotic effect of compound probiotics to antibiotics as a feed additive for chicken. Two hundred and seventy newly hatched yellow-feather broilers were randomly divided into three groups: the control group (Con), probiotics (Pb), and antibiotics group (Ab). The Pb group received compound probiotics (, , , and yeast) via drinking water for 24 days. The Ab group received antibiotics (zinc bacitracin and colistin sulfate) in their diet for 24 days. All broilers were slaughtered on day 42. Compared with the Con group, the body weight was significantly increased on days 13, 28, and 42 in the Pb group ( < 0.05), and markedly increased on day 28 in the Ab group ( < 0.05). Compared with the Ab group, the body weight of the broilers in the Pb group increased significantly on day 13 ( < 0.05). Compared to the Con and Pb groups, the antibiotics treatment reduced the feed intake ( < 0.05), but there was no significant difference in the feed conversion ratio between the Ab and Pb groups ( > 0.05). The feed conversion ratio of the broilers treated with antibiotics or probiotics significantly decreased compared to the Con group ( < 0.05). The depth of duodenum, jejunum, and ileum crypts in the Pb group decreased significantly compared to the Con and Ab group ( < 0.05). The ratio of the villi length to crypt depth of duodenum, jejunum, and ileum epithelium was significantly increased in the Pb group compared to the Con group ( < 0.05). The genera and were the most significantly enriched bacteria in the Ab and Pb groups, respectively ( < 0.05). The expression of the genes related to antibiotic resistance was significantly decreased in the Pb group compared to the Ab group ( < 0.05). Although both compound probiotics and antibiotics can improve growth performance, antibiotics increased the abundance of harmful bacteria and drug-resistant genes, while probiotics increased abundance, which is related to a decrease in the drug-resistant gene expression. Moreover, the probiotics treatment improved small intestinal morphology and fecal emissions, while antibiotics have no significant effect on these indicators, indicating a bright future for probiotics as an alternative to feed antibiotics in the yellow-feather broiler industry.
本研究致力于比较复合益生菌与抗生素作为鸡饲料添加剂的益生菌效果。270只新孵化的黄羽肉鸡随机分为三组:对照组(Con)、益生菌组(Pb)和抗生素组(Ab)。Pb组通过饮水给予复合益生菌(、、、和酵母),持续24天。Ab组在其日粮中添加抗生素(杆菌肽锌和硫酸黏菌素),持续24天。所有肉鸡在第42天屠宰。与Con组相比,Pb组在第13、28和42天体重显著增加(<0.05),Ab组在第28天体重显著增加(<0.05)。与Ab组相比,Pb组肉鸡在第13天体重显著增加(<0.05)。与Con组和Pb组相比,抗生素处理降低了采食量(<0.05),但Ab组和Pb组之间的饲料转化率无显著差异(>0.05)。与Con组相比,用抗生素或益生菌处理的肉鸡饲料转化率显著降低(<0.05)。与Con组和Ab组相比,Pb组十二指肠、空肠和回肠隐窝深度显著降低(<0.05)。与Con组相比,Pb组十二指肠、空肠和回肠上皮绒毛长度与隐窝深度之比显著增加(<0.05)。在Ab组和Pb组中,属和属分别是最显著富集的细菌(<0.05)。与Ab组相比,Pb组中与抗生素抗性相关基因的表达显著降低(<0.05)。虽然复合益生菌和抗生素都能提高生长性能,但抗生素增加了有害细菌和耐药基因的丰度,而益生菌增加了属的丰度,这与耐药基因表达的降低有关。此外,益生菌处理改善了小肠形态和粪便排放,而抗生素对这些指标无显著影响,这表明益生菌作为黄羽肉鸡行业饲料抗生素替代品的前景广阔。