Gluch Sibylle
Mathematisch-Physikalischer Salon, Staatliche Kunstsammlungen Dresden, Germany.
Presently: Independent Researcher, Germany.
Hist Sci. 2024 Sep;62(3):329-365. doi: 10.1177/00732753231193819. Epub 2023 Sep 28.
In the eighteenth century, the sciences and their applications adopted a new attitude based on quantification and, increasingly, on a notion of precision. Within this process, instruments played a significant role. However, while new devices such as the micrometer, telescope, and pendulum clock embodied a formerly unknown potential of precision, this could only be realized by defining a set of practices regulating their application and control. The paper picks up the case of pendulum clocks used in eighteenth-century observatories in order to show the process of learning in the course of which the pendulum clock first became a precision instrument. By examining the results of an especially developed statistical analysis, conducted to compare the performance of eighteenth-century clocks, it highlights the diversity of conditions, attitudes, and manners of handling that are characteristic for the epoch. In this way, it underlines the necessity of standardization of timekeeping practices rather than exclusively focusing on the technological development of clocks. Ultimately, the paper discusses the role of makers and users in order to show the evolution of a "precision instrument."
在18世纪,科学及其应用采取了一种基于量化且越来越基于精确概念的新态度。在这个过程中,仪器发挥了重要作用。然而,尽管诸如测微计、望远镜和摆钟等新装置体现了一种前所未有的精确潜力,但只有通过定义一套规范其应用和控制的实践,这种潜力才能得以实现。本文以18世纪天文台使用的摆钟为例,展示摆钟首次成为精密仪器过程中的学习过程。通过研究为比较18世纪时钟性能而专门开展的统计分析结果,它突出了该时代特有的条件、态度和操作方式的多样性。通过这种方式,它强调了计时实践标准化的必要性,而不是仅仅专注于时钟的技术发展。最终,本文讨论了制造者和使用者的作用,以展示“精密仪器”的演变。