Mathematisch-Physikalischer Salon, Staatliche Kunstsammlungen Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Ann Sci. 2024 Jan-Apr;81(1-2):160-188. doi: 10.1080/00033790.2023.2282773. Epub 2024 Feb 2.
In 1736/37, Joseph-Nicolas Delisle and Jean Jacques Dortous de Mairan communicated about the clocks that would enable the astronomers of the Saint Petersburg observatory to make highly exact observations. Delisle, who was in charge of the Saint Petersburg observatory, demanded old-fashioned clocks in the manner of Huygens. Mairan, well-versed in astronomy himself, recommended equation clocks. The article uses these seemingly inappropriate preferences to discuss eighteenth-century notions of accuracy and precision in clocks. It analyses the multiple factors that influenced expectations regarding the performance of timekeeping instruments, and draws attention to handling and monitoring practices. The latter reflected the individual user's purposes and experience, but also affected the clocks' going. Furthermore, the article presents the result of a statistical analysis, which serves to evaluate the historical performance of the Saint Petersburg observatory clocks and provides a foil against which Delisle's judgement of them is examined.
1736/37 年,约瑟夫-尼古拉·德利尔和让-雅克·多托斯·德梅兰就将使圣彼得堡天文台的天文学家能够进行高度精确观测的时钟进行了交流。负责圣彼得堡天文台的德利尔要求使用惠更斯式的老式时钟。多托斯·德梅兰本人精通天文学,他推荐了均时差时钟。本文利用这些看似不恰当的偏好来讨论钟表在 18 世纪的精确性概念。它分析了影响对计时仪器性能预期的多个因素,并提请注意处理和监测做法。后者反映了使用者个人的目的和经验,但也影响了时钟的走时。此外,本文还介绍了一项统计分析的结果,该结果用于评估圣彼得堡天文台时钟的历史性能,并为检验德利尔对它们的判断提供了依据。