• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单孔胸腔镜微创治疗食管鳞癌的疗效及并发症:单中心经验

Efficacy and complications of single-port thoracoscopic minimally invasive esophagectomy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a single-center experience.

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, No. 420 Fuma Rd. Jin'an District, Fuzhou, 350014, Fujian Province, People's Republic of China.

Department of Thoracic Surgery, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, No. 420 Fuma Rd. Jin'an District, Fuzhou, 350014, Fujian Province, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2023 Sep 28;13(1):16325. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-41772-4.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-023-41772-4
PMID:37770495
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10539285/
Abstract

The traditional surgical technique for esophageal cancer is mainly open esophagectomy. With the innovation of surgical instruments, it is necessary to re-optimize the minimally invasive surgery. Therefore, single-port thoracoscopic minimally invasive esophagectomy (SPTE) is an important direction of development. This study retrospectively analyzed 202 patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma undergoing SPTE. Surgical variables and postoperative complications were further evaluated. All procedures were performed using SPTE. The number of patients who received R0 resection was 201 (99.5%). The total number of resected lymph nodes during the whole operation was on average 32.01 ± 12.15, and the mean number of positive lymph nodes was 1.56 ± 2.51. In 170 cases (84.2%), intraoperative blood loss did not exceed 100 ml (ml), while 1 case had postoperative bleeding. Only 1 patient (0.5%) required reoperation after surgery. Postoperative complications included 42 cases of pneumonia (20.8%), 9 cases of anastomotic leak (4.5%), 7 cases of pleural effusion (3.8%), and 1 case (0.5%) of both pleural hemorrhage and acute gastrointestinal hemorrhagic ulcer. Besides, we also recorded the time to remove the drain tube, which averaged 9.13 ± 5.31 days. In our study, we confirmed that the application of SPTE in clinical practice is feasible, and that the postoperative complications are at a low level.

摘要

传统的食管癌手术方法主要是开放性食管切除术。随着手术器械的创新,有必要重新优化微创手术。因此,单孔胸腔镜微创食管切除术(SPTE)是一个重要的发展方向。本研究回顾性分析了 202 例接受 SPTE 的食管鳞癌患者。进一步评估了手术变量和术后并发症。所有手术均采用 SPTE 进行。201 例(99.5%)患者行 R0 切除术。整个手术过程中切除的淋巴结总数平均为 32.01±12.15 个,阳性淋巴结的平均数量为 1.56±2.51 个。在 170 例(84.2%)患者中,术中出血量不超过 100ml(ml),而 1 例患者术后出血。仅 1 例(0.5%)患者术后需要再次手术。术后并发症包括肺炎 42 例(20.8%)、吻合口漏 9 例(4.5%)、胸腔积液 7 例(3.8%)、血气胸 1 例(0.5%)和急性胃肠道出血性溃疡 1 例。此外,我们还记录了引流管拔除的时间,平均为 9.13±5.31 天。在本研究中,我们证实了 SPTE 在临床实践中的应用是可行的,并且术后并发症处于较低水平。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4dfa/10539285/c0b2cdd2c96b/41598_2023_41772_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4dfa/10539285/85928e84eb55/41598_2023_41772_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4dfa/10539285/c0b2cdd2c96b/41598_2023_41772_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4dfa/10539285/85928e84eb55/41598_2023_41772_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4dfa/10539285/c0b2cdd2c96b/41598_2023_41772_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Efficacy and complications of single-port thoracoscopic minimally invasive esophagectomy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a single-center experience.单孔胸腔镜微创治疗食管鳞癌的疗效及并发症:单中心经验
Sci Rep. 2023 Sep 28;13(1):16325. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-41772-4.
2
Clinical application and observation of single-port inflatable mediastinoscopy combined with laparoscopy for radical esophagectomy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.单孔充气纵隔镜联合腹腔镜在食管鳞状细胞癌根治性食管切除术中的临床应用与观察
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2020 Jun 5;15(1):125. doi: 10.1186/s13019-020-01168-1.
3
[Clinical application and analysis of single-port laparoscopic and thoracoscopic McKeown esophagectomy for esophageal cancer].单孔腹腔镜与胸腔镜McKeown食管癌切除术的临床应用与分析
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2021 Aug 3;101(29):2316-2321. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20201215-03359.
4
Single-Port Thoracoscopic Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer.单孔胸腔镜微创食管癌切除术治疗食管癌
World J Surg. 2019 Feb;43(2):567-570. doi: 10.1007/s00268-018-4811-7.
5
Does robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy really have the advantage of lymphadenectomy over video-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy in treating esophageal squamous cell carcinoma? A propensity score-matched analysis based on short-term outcomes.机器人辅助微创食管切除术在治疗食管鳞癌方面真的比电视辅助微创食管切除术具有淋巴结清扫优势吗?基于短期结果的倾向评分匹配分析。
Dis Esophagus. 2019 Jul 1;32(7). doi: 10.1093/dote/doy110.
6
Minimally invasive 3-field esophagectomy with cervical single-port access.经颈部单孔入路的微创三野食管癌切除术
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2014 Aug;24(4):e151-4. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000014.
7
[The efficacy and safety analysis of cervical and abdominal double single-port minimally invasive esophagectomy].[颈腹双单孔微创食管切除术的疗效与安全性分析]
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2023 Jun 20;103(23):1767-1773. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20230110-00057.
8
Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy with Thoracic Duct Resection Post Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Carcinoma Esophagus-Impact on Lymph Node Yield and Hemodynamic Parameters.新辅助放化疗后行胸导管切除术的微创食管癌切除术——对淋巴结获取量和血流动力学参数的影响
J Gastrointest Cancer. 2019 Jun;50(2):230-235. doi: 10.1007/s12029-018-0051-1.
9
Comparison of minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy and left transthoracic esophagectomy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients: a propensity score-matched analysis.微创 Ivor Lewis 食管切除术与左开胸食管切除术治疗食管鳞癌的比较:倾向评分匹配分析。
BMC Cancer. 2019 May 27;19(1):500. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-5656-7.
10
Robot-assisted transhiatal esophagectomy: a 3-year single-center experience.机器人辅助经食管裂孔食管切除术:3 年单中心经验。
Dis Esophagus. 2013 Feb-Mar;26(2):159-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2012.01325.x. Epub 2012 Mar 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Long-Term Results of Single- and Multi-Incision Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: Experience of 348 Cases.单切口与多切口微创食管癌切除术的长期疗效:348例经验
Biomedicines. 2025 Jun 21;13(7):1523. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines13071523.
2
Comparative outcomes of patients with esophageal cancer undergoing single-port and four-port thoracoscopic esophagectomy: a single-center experience.单孔与四孔胸腔镜食管癌切除术患者的比较结果:单中心经验
Updates Surg. 2025 Jun 23. doi: 10.1007/s13304-025-02244-8.

本文引用的文献

1
Application of single-port laparoscopic retrograde gastric mobilization during McKeown esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.单孔腹腔镜逆行胃游离术在食管癌McKeown食管切除术中的应用
Ann Thorac Med. 2023 Jan-Mar;18(1):39-44. doi: 10.4103/atm.atm_205_22. Epub 2023 Jan 25.
2
Network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on esophagectomies in esophageal cancer: The superiority of minimally invasive surgery.网状荟萃分析食管癌根治术中随机对照试验:微创手术的优越性。
World J Gastroenterol. 2022 Aug 14;28(30):4201-4210. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i30.4201.
3
Oesophageal cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up.
食管癌:ESMO 诊断、治疗及随访临床实践指南
Ann Oncol. 2022 Oct;33(10):992-1004. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.07.003. Epub 2022 Jul 29.
4
Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy versus Open Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.机器人辅助微创食管癌切除术与开放性食管癌切除术治疗食管癌的系统评价和Meta分析
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Jun 29;14(13):3177. doi: 10.3390/cancers14133177.
5
Feasibility study of adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 after curative esophagectomy following neoadjuvant chemotherapy for esophageal cancer.新辅助化疗后根治性食管癌切除术后 S-1 辅助化疗的可行性研究。
BMC Cancer. 2022 Jun 30;22(1):718. doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-09827-3.
6
Open versus hybrid versus totally minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy: Systematic review and meta-analysis.经胸入路与胸腹联合入路与完全微创 Ivor Lewis 食管切除术:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2022 Dec;164(6):e233-e254. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2021.12.051. Epub 2022 Jan 18.
7
Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries.《全球癌症统计数据 2020:全球 185 个国家和地区 36 种癌症的发病率和死亡率估计》。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
8
Current surgical treatment standards for esophageal and esophagogastric junction cancer.当前食管和食管胃交界部癌的外科治疗标准。
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2020 Dec;1482(1):77-84. doi: 10.1111/nyas.14454. Epub 2020 Aug 14.
9
Global Burden of 5 Major Types of Gastrointestinal Cancer.全球 5 大常见胃肠道癌症负担
Gastroenterology. 2020 Jul;159(1):335-349.e15. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.02.068. Epub 2020 Apr 2.
10
Risk Factors of Pulmonary Complications After Minimally Invasive Surgery for Elderly Patients with Vertebral Compression Fractures.老年椎体压缩骨折患者微创手术后肺部并发症的危险因素
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2020 Jan 13;16:7-15. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S231383. eCollection 2020.