• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估装配工人在多任务切换过程中的认知负荷。

Assessing cognitive workloads of assembly workers during multi-task switching.

机构信息

School of Mechatronic Engineering and Automation, Shanghai University, Shanghai, 200444, China.

School of Civil Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2023 Sep 29;13(1):16356. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-43477-0.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-023-43477-0
PMID:37773513
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10542341/
Abstract

Complex assembly tasks with multiple manual operations and steps often require rapid judgment and action under time pressure and cause most human-related errors. The task switching and action transitions are major sources of these errors. This study intends to implement an electroencephalography (EEG) approach to quantitatively evaluate the mental workload during task switching and transition. The time-frequency and spectrum analysis were utilized to compute and reflect the task demand between the intervals of individual tasks. This study developed an experiment to validate the proposed assessment approach and benchmark the results with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration task load index (NASA-TLX) subjective evaluation scale analysis. The results show that the average value of the power spectral densities (PSDs) of the gamma band signal of the AF4 channel and the beta band signal of Channel F3 show distinctive signal patterns among task stages and intervals. During the interval between the idling stage and the part selection stage, the peak of the PSD envelope increased from 18 to 27 Hz, suggesting advanced cognition increases the mental workload of the interval between different tasks. Therefore, the task switching period cannot be regarded as rest and need to be optimized with better task organization.

摘要

复杂的装配任务涉及多个手动操作和步骤,通常需要在时间压力下做出快速判断和行动,这容易导致大多数人为错误。任务切换和操作转换是这些错误的主要来源。本研究旨在实施一种脑电图(EEG)方法,以定量评估任务切换和转换过程中的心理工作量。本研究采用时频和频谱分析来计算和反映个体任务间隔之间的任务需求。本研究设计了一个实验来验证所提出的评估方法,并将结果与美国国家航空航天局任务负荷指数(NASA-TLX)主观评估量表分析进行基准比较。结果表明,AF4 通道伽马波段信号和 F3 通道贝塔波段信号的平均功率谱密度(PSD)值在任务阶段和间隔之间呈现出明显的信号模式。在空闲阶段和零件选择阶段之间的间隔期间,PSD 包络的峰值从 18 赫兹增加到 27 赫兹,这表明高级认知增加了不同任务之间间隔的心理工作量。因此,任务切换期间不能被视为休息时间,需要通过更好的任务组织进行优化。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c42/10542341/9298e9c07cff/41598_2023_43477_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c42/10542341/a221678d35e6/41598_2023_43477_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c42/10542341/b46e7c164b90/41598_2023_43477_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c42/10542341/c124bccd98b6/41598_2023_43477_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c42/10542341/6f9b47da7da8/41598_2023_43477_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c42/10542341/441f868c1000/41598_2023_43477_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c42/10542341/9eaaf1f372aa/41598_2023_43477_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c42/10542341/48ba34d21689/41598_2023_43477_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c42/10542341/deb39d7d9a7b/41598_2023_43477_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c42/10542341/51ad3a3ad899/41598_2023_43477_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c42/10542341/6a376f355ae4/41598_2023_43477_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c42/10542341/9298e9c07cff/41598_2023_43477_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c42/10542341/a221678d35e6/41598_2023_43477_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c42/10542341/b46e7c164b90/41598_2023_43477_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c42/10542341/c124bccd98b6/41598_2023_43477_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c42/10542341/6f9b47da7da8/41598_2023_43477_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c42/10542341/441f868c1000/41598_2023_43477_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c42/10542341/9eaaf1f372aa/41598_2023_43477_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c42/10542341/48ba34d21689/41598_2023_43477_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c42/10542341/deb39d7d9a7b/41598_2023_43477_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c42/10542341/51ad3a3ad899/41598_2023_43477_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c42/10542341/6a376f355ae4/41598_2023_43477_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c42/10542341/9298e9c07cff/41598_2023_43477_Fig11_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Assessing cognitive workloads of assembly workers during multi-task switching.评估装配工人在多任务切换过程中的认知负荷。
Sci Rep. 2023 Sep 29;13(1):16356. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-43477-0.
2
Validation of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Task Load Index (NASA-TLX) adapted for the whole day repeated measures context.验证经改编后适用于全天重复测量情境的美国国家航空航天局任务负荷指数(NASA-TLX)。
Ergonomics. 2022 Jul;65(7):960-975. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2021.2006317. Epub 2021 Nov 22.
3
Quantitative assessment of workload and stressors in clinical radiation oncology.临床放射肿瘤学中工作量和应激源的定量评估。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Aug 1;83(5):e571-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.01.063. Epub 2012 Apr 13.
4
Validation of the Raw National Aeronautics and Space Administration Task Load Index (NASA-TLX) Questionnaire to Assess Perceived Workload in Patient Monitoring Tasks: Pooled Analysis Study Using Mixed Models.验证原始美国国家航空航天局任务负荷指数(NASA-TLX)问卷在评估患者监护任务中的感知工作量的有效性:使用混合模型的 pooled 分析研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Sep 7;22(9):e19472. doi: 10.2196/19472.
5
Comparison of NASA-TLX scale, modified Cooper-Harper scale and mean inter-beat interval as measures of pilot mental workload during simulated flight tasks.比较 NASA-TLX 量表、改良的 Cooper-Harper 量表和平均心搏间期作为模拟飞行任务中飞行员心理工作量的测量指标。
Ergonomics. 2019 Feb;62(2):246-254. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2018.1471159. Epub 2019 Jan 27.
6
Measurement and identification of mental workload during simulated computer tasks with multimodal methods and machine learning.采用多模态方法和机器学习测量和识别模拟计算机任务中的心理负荷。
Ergonomics. 2020 Jul;63(7):896-908. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2020.1759699. Epub 2020 May 7.
7
Impact of experience on the sensitivity, acceptability, and intrusive of two subjective mental workload techniques: The NASA TLX and workload profile.经验对两种主观心理负荷技术(NASA 任务负荷指数和负荷剖面图)的灵敏度、可接受性和侵入性的影响。
Work. 2023;75(4):1265-1275. doi: 10.3233/WOR-211324.
8
Higher mental workload is associated with poorer laparoscopic performance as measured by the NASA-TLX tool.更高的心理工作量与较差的腹腔镜表现相关,这可以通过 NASA-TLX 工具来衡量。
Simul Healthc. 2010 Oct;5(5):267-71. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0b013e3181e3f329.
9
Understanding Cognitive Performance During Robot-Assisted Surgery.了解机器人辅助手术期间的认知表现。
Urology. 2015 Oct;86(4):751-7. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2015.07.028. Epub 2015 Aug 5.
10
The National Aeronautics and Space Administration-task load index: NASA-TLX: evaluation of its use in surgery.美国国家航空航天局任务负荷指数:NASA-TLX:在外科手术中的应用评估。
ANZ J Surg. 2022 Nov;92(11):3022-3028. doi: 10.1111/ans.17830. Epub 2022 Jun 8.

本文引用的文献

1
Workflow interruption and nurses' mental workload in electronic health record tasks: An observational study.电子健康记录任务中的工作流程中断与护士的心理工作量:一项观察性研究。
BMC Nurs. 2023 Mar 9;22(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s12912-023-01209-9.
2
Combination of Group Singular Value Decomposition and eLORETA Identifies Human EEG Networks and Responses to Transcranial Photobiomodulation.组奇异值分解与eLORETA相结合可识别人类脑电图网络及对经颅光生物调节的反应。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2022 May 10;16:853909. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.853909. eCollection 2022.
3
Study on the nonfatigue and fatigue states of orchard workers based on electrocardiogram signal analysis.
基于心电图信号分析的果园工人非疲劳与疲劳状态研究。
Sci Rep. 2022 Mar 22;12(1):4858. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-08705-z.
4
Spirometry has added value over electrodermal activity as a physiological marker of mental load in male subjects.肺量测定法比皮肤电活动更能增加男性受试者心理负荷的生理标志物价值。
Sci Rep. 2022 Mar 16;12(1):4496. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-08480-x.
5
Removal of movement-induced EEG artifacts: current state of the art and guidelines.运动诱发电位 EEG 伪迹的去除:最新进展与指南。
J Neural Eng. 2022 Feb 28;19(1). doi: 10.1088/1741-2552/ac542c.
6
Optimized electroencephalogram and functional near-infrared spectroscopy-based mental workload detection method for practical applications.基于优化脑电图和功能近红外光谱的实用型脑力负荷检测方法。
Biomed Eng Online. 2022 Feb 2;21(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s12938-022-00980-1.
7
Tracking of Mental Workload with a Mobile EEG Sensor.使用移动 EEG 传感器追踪精神负荷。
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Jul 31;21(15):5205. doi: 10.3390/s21155205.
8
Human-centred design in industry 4.0: case study review and opportunities for future research.工业4.0中的以人为本设计:案例研究综述与未来研究机遇
J Intell Manuf. 2022;33(1):35-76. doi: 10.1007/s10845-021-01796-x. Epub 2021 Jun 11.
9
Gamma entrainment frequency affects mood, memory and cognition: an exploratory pilot study.γ 夹带频率影响情绪、记忆和认知:一项探索性初步研究。
Brain Inform. 2020 Nov 23;7(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s40708-020-00119-9.
10
Sensor Location Optimization of Wireless Wearable fNIRS System for Cognitive Workload Monitoring Using a Data-Driven Approach for Improved Wearability.基于数据驱动的方法优化无线可穿戴 fNIRS 系统传感器位置以进行认知负荷监测,提高可穿戴性。
Sensors (Basel). 2020 Sep 7;20(18):5082. doi: 10.3390/s20185082.