• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

BRAF 突变型晚期胆道癌的比较基因组分析和临床结局。

Comparative Genomic Analysis and Clinical Outcomes of BRAF-mutated Advanced Biliary Tract Cancers.

机构信息

Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.

Medical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Clin Cancer Res. 2023 Dec 1;29(23):4853-4862. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-23-1926.

DOI:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-23-1926
PMID:37773629
Abstract

PURPOSE

BRAF mutations are rare in biliary tract cancers (BTC), but are of interest given the recent developments in targeted therapy for BTC. We investigated the clinical outcomes in a cohort of BRAF-mutant advanced BTC treated with first-line chemotherapy. Furthermore, we investigated the genomic landscape of BRAF class I, II, and III mutations in the intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) subgroup of BTC.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

We analyzed two nonoverlapping cohorts. We examined the genomic landscape of BRAF-mutated iCCA in a "genomic cohort" [187 class I, 82 class II, 113 class III BRAF mutants and 8,026 wildtype (WT)]. We also analyzed median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) on first-line chemotherapy in a separate multi-institutional "clinical cohort" of patients with BTC (including iCCA and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (eCCA) and gallbladder cancer; 41 class I, 32 class II+III BRAF mutants and 1,042 WT).

RESULTS

In the entire BTC clinical cohort, the median PFS was shorter for class I [HR, 2.11 (P < 0.001)] and class II+III [HR, 1.72 (P = 0.007)] as compared with BRAF WT. OS was also shorter in class I [HR, 2.04 (P = 0.011)] and class II+III [HR, 1.86 (P = 0.002)] as compared with BRAF WT. In the iCCA subgroup, class I alterations were mutually exclusive with FGFR2, IDH1/2, ERBB2, and KRAS mutations. Class II+III mutations appear to be mutually exclusive with FGFR2 and KRAS.

CONCLUSIONS

In BTC, all classes of BRAF mutations are associated with a worse prognosis. BRAF mutations occur in 5% of iCCA subgroup and may be mutually exclusive with other targetable mutations.

摘要

目的

BRAF 突变在胆管癌(BTC)中较为罕见,但鉴于 BTC 靶向治疗的最新进展,此类突变具有重要意义。我们调查了接受一线化疗治疗的 BRAF 突变型晚期 BTC 患者的临床结局。此外,我们还研究了 BTC 中肝内胆管癌(iCCA)亚组中 BRAF Ⅰ型、Ⅱ型和Ⅲ型突变的基因组图谱。

实验设计

我们分析了两个不重叠的队列。我们在“基因组队列”中检查了 BRAF 突变型 iCCA 的基因组图谱[187 个 I 型、82 个 II 型、113 个 III 型 BRAF 突变体和 8026 个野生型(WT)]。我们还在另一个多机构的 BTC 患者的“临床队列”中分析了一线化疗中位无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS),该队列包括 iCCA、肝外胆管癌(eCCA)和胆囊癌;41 个 I 型、32 个 II+III BRAF 突变体和 1042 个 WT)。

结果

在整个 BTC 临床队列中,I 型和 II+III 型 BRAF 突变的中位 PFS 更短[I 型 HR,2.11(P < 0.001)和 II+III 型 HR,1.72(P = 0.007)]。与 BRAF WT 相比,I 型和 II+III 型 BRAF 的 OS 也更短[I 型 HR,2.04(P = 0.011)和 II+III 型 HR,1.86(P = 0.002)]。在 iCCA 亚组中,I 型改变与 FGFR2、IDH1/2、ERBB2 和 KRAS 突变互斥。II+III 型突变似乎与 FGFR2 和 KRAS 互斥。

结论

在 BTC 中,所有类型的 BRAF 突变均与预后较差相关。BRAF 突变发生在 5%的 iCCA 亚组中,可能与其他可靶向突变互斥。

相似文献

1
Comparative Genomic Analysis and Clinical Outcomes of BRAF-mutated Advanced Biliary Tract Cancers.BRAF 突变型晚期胆道癌的比较基因组分析和临床结局。
Clin Cancer Res. 2023 Dec 1;29(23):4853-4862. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-23-1926.
2
The clinical landscape of cell-free DNA alterations in 1671 patients with advanced biliary tract cancer.1671 例晚期胆道癌患者游离 DNA 改变的临床特征。
Ann Oncol. 2022 Dec;33(12):1269-1283. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.09.150. Epub 2022 Sep 9.
3
Prognostic impact of FGFR2/3 alterations in patients with biliary tract cancers receiving systemic chemotherapy: the BITCOIN study.FGFR2/3改变对接受全身化疗的胆道癌患者的预后影响:比特币研究
Eur J Cancer. 2022 May;166:165-175. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.02.013. Epub 2022 Mar 15.
4
Therapeutic relevance of targeted sequencing in management of patients with advanced biliary tract cancer: DNA damage repair gene mutations as a predictive biomarker.靶向测序在晚期胆道癌患者管理中的治疗相关性:DNA 损伤修复基因突变作为预测生物标志物。
Eur J Cancer. 2019 Oct;120:31-39. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.07.022. Epub 2019 Aug 30.
5
Panitumumab in combination with gemcitabine and oxaliplatin does not prolong survival in wild-type KRAS advanced biliary tract cancer: A randomized phase 2 trial (Vecti-BIL study).帕尼单抗联合吉西他滨和奥沙利铂不能延长野生型KRAS晚期胆管癌患者的生存期:一项随机2期试验(Vecti-BIL研究)
Cancer. 2016 Feb 15;122(4):574-81. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29778. Epub 2015 Nov 5.
6
Clinical, Genomic, and Transcriptomic Data Profiling of Biliary Tract Cancer Reveals Subtype-Specific Immune Signatures.胆道癌的临床、基因组和转录组数据分析揭示了特定亚型的免疫特征。
JCO Precis Oncol. 2022 Jun;6:e2100510. doi: 10.1200/PO.21.00510.
7
Targeting BRAF-Mutant Biliary Tract Cancer: Recent Advances and Future Challenges.靶向 BRAF 突变型胆管癌:最新进展与未来挑战。
Cancer Control. 2020 Jan-Dec;27(1):1073274820983013. doi: 10.1177/1073274820983013.
8
Genetic Determinants of Outcome in Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma.肝内胆管癌结局的遗传决定因素。
Hepatology. 2021 Sep;74(3):1429-1444. doi: 10.1002/hep.31829.
9
Clinical Implications of BRCA Mutations in Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer.BRCA突变在晚期胆管癌中的临床意义
Oncology. 2023;101(1):41-48. doi: 10.1159/000527525. Epub 2022 Oct 18.
10
Brain Metastases from Biliary Tract Cancer: Case Series and Clinicogenomic Analysis.胆道癌脑转移:病例系列及临床基因组分析。
Oncologist. 2023 Apr 6;28(4):327-332. doi: 10.1093/oncolo/oyac273.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of clinical features by primary site in patients with biliary tract cancer who received gemcitabine-based chemotherapy: an exploratory analysis of JCOG1113.接受吉西他滨为主化疗的胆道癌患者按原发部位比较临床特征:JCOG1113的探索性分析
Int J Clin Oncol. 2025 Jul 24. doi: 10.1007/s10147-025-02834-x.
2
New systemic treatment paradigms in advanced biliary tract cancer and variations in patient access across Europe.晚期胆管癌的新型全身治疗模式及欧洲各地患者治疗途径的差异。
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2025 Feb 19;50:101170. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.101170. eCollection 2025 Mar.
3
Cholangiocarcinoma Targeted Therapies: Mechanisms of Action and Resistance.
胆管癌靶向治疗:作用机制与耐药性
Am J Pathol. 2025 Mar;195(3):437-452. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2024.11.005. Epub 2024 Dec 19.
4
Targeting All Alterations: The (Re)-Search Continues.靶向所有变异:研究持续进行。
JCO Precis Oncol. 2024 Feb;8:e2300670. doi: 10.1200/PO.23.00670.
5
Methylthioadenosine Phosphorylase Genomic Loss in Advanced Gastrointestinal Cancers.甲基硫代腺苷磷酸化酶基因在晚期胃肠道癌症中的缺失。
Oncologist. 2024 Jun 3;29(6):493-503. doi: 10.1093/oncolo/oyae011.
6
[Progress of BRAF Gene Alteration in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer].[非小细胞肺癌中BRAF基因改变的研究进展]
Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi. 2024 Jan 20;27(1):73-80. doi: 10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2024.101.01.