Piscitello Gina M, Parker William F
Division of General Internal Medicine, Section of Palliative Care and Medical Ethics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA; Palliative Research Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; MacLean Center for Clinical Medical Ethics, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.
Chest. 2024 Mar;165(3):601-609. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2023.09.024. Epub 2023 Sep 29.
At the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, whether performing CPR on patients with COVID-19 would be effective or increase COVID-19 transmission to health care workers was unclear.
Did the prevalence of do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders by COVID-19 status change over the first year of the pandemic as risks such as COVID-19 transmission to health care workers improved?
This cross-sectional study assessed DNR orders for all adult patients admitted to ICUs at two academic medical centers in Chicago, IL, between April 2020 and April 2021. DNR orders by COVID-19 status were assessed using risk-adjusted mixed-effects logistic regression and propensity score matching by patient severity of illness.
The study population of 3,070 critically ill patients were 46% Black, 53% male, with median age (interquartile range [IQR]) 63 (50-73) years. Eighteen percent were COVID-19 positive and 27% had a DNR order. Black and Latinx patients had higher absolute rates of DNR orders than White patients (30% vs 29% vs 23%; P = .006). After adjustment for patient characteristics, illness severity, and hospital location, DNR orders were more likely in patients with COVID-19 in the nonpropensity score-matched (n = 3,070; aOR, 2.01; 95% CI, 1.64-2.38) and propensity score-matched (n = 1,118; aOR, 1.91; 95% CI, 1.45-2.52) cohorts. The prevalence of DNR orders remained higher for patients with COVID-19 than patients without COVID-19 during all months of the study period (difference in prevalence over time, P = .751).
In this multihospital study, DNR orders remained persistently higher for patients with COVID-19 vs patients without COVID-19 with similar severity of illness during the first year of the pandemic. The specific reasons why DNR orders remained persistently elevated for patients with COVID-19 should be assessed in future studies, because these changes may continue to affect COVID-19 patient care and outcomes.
在新冠疫情初期,对新冠患者实施心肺复苏是否有效,或者是否会增加医护人员感染新冠病毒的风险尚不清楚。
在疫情的第一年,随着新冠病毒传播给医护人员等风险状况的改善,根据新冠病毒感染状况下达的不要复苏(DNR)医嘱的比例是否发生了变化?
这项横断面研究评估了2020年4月至2021年4月期间,伊利诺伊州芝加哥市两家学术医疗中心收治的所有成年ICU患者的DNR医嘱情况。通过风险调整后的混合效应逻辑回归和根据患者疾病严重程度进行的倾向得分匹配,评估了不同新冠病毒感染状况下的DNR医嘱。
研究纳入的3070例重症患者中,46%为黑人,53%为男性,年龄中位数(四分位间距[IQR])为63(50 - 73)岁。18%的患者新冠病毒检测呈阳性,27%的患者有DNR医嘱。黑人和拉丁裔患者的DNR医嘱绝对比例高于白人患者(30%对29%对23%;P = 0.006)。在对患者特征、疾病严重程度和医院位置进行调整后,在未进行倾向得分匹配(n = 3070;调整后比值比[aOR],2.01;95%置信区间[CI],1.64 - 2.38)和倾向得分匹配(n = 1118;aOR,1.91;95% CI,1.45 - 2.52)的队列中,新冠病毒感染患者更有可能有DNR医嘱。在研究期间的所有月份,新冠病毒感染患者的DNR医嘱比例一直高于未感染新冠病毒的患者(随时间的患病率差异,P = 0.751)。
在这项多医院研究中,在疫情的第一年,病情严重程度相似的情况下,新冠病毒感染患者的DNR医嘱比例始终高于未感染新冠病毒的患者。未来的研究应评估新冠病毒感染患者的DNR医嘱比例持续升高的具体原因,因为这些变化可能会继续影响新冠患者的护理和预后。