• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于理解复杂和不确定环境中人与决策支持工具之间相互作用的认知建模:研究方案。

Cognitive modeling for understanding interactions between people and decision support tools in complex and uncertain environments: A study protocol.

机构信息

School of Government and Public Transformation, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Mexico City, México.

Faculty of Higher Studies Iztacala, National Autonomous University of Mexico, Mexico City, Mexico.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2023 Oct 5;18(10):e0290683. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290683. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0290683
PMID:37797048
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10553798/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Recent advances in Computational Intelligence Tools and the escalating need for decision-making in the face of complex and uncertain phenomena like pandemics, climate change, and geopolitics necessitate understanding the interaction between these tools and human behavior. It is crucial to efficiently utilize the decision-makers cognitive resources in addressing specific problems.

METHODS

The main goal of this present protocol is to describe the effect that CITs (Computational Intelligence Tools) have on decisions made during complex and uncertain situations. It is an exploratory study with a mixed methodology. Solomon's group experiment design includes a narrative analysis of cognitive features such as integrative complexity (IC), cognitive flexibility (CF), and fluid intelligence (FI). Additionally, measures of neural activity (NA), physiological measures (PM), and eye-tracking data (ET) will be collected during the experimental session to examine the marginal impact of these processes on decision outcomes (DO) and their relation to CIT capabilities. To achieve this objective, 120 undergraduate and graduate students involved in decision-making will participate as subjects. The approximate duration of the study will be 2 years. Strict adherence to the relevant ethical considerations will be maintained during the performance of the experimental tasks.

DISCUSSION

The study will provide valuable information on CITs' effect on decision-making under complex and uncertain contexts. This will help to better understand the link between technology and human behavior, which has important implications. CIT designers can use future results and at the same time, it will be possible to understand cognitive, behavioral, physiological processes, and even the subjective assessment of individuals when they use technological tools to solve a problem.

摘要

背景

计算智能工具的最新进展以及面对复杂和不确定的现象(如大流行病、气候变化和地缘政治)需要决策,这使得理解这些工具与人类行为之间的相互作用变得至关重要。高效利用决策者的认知资源来解决特定问题是非常重要的。

方法

本研究方案的主要目的是描述计算智能工具(CITs)在复杂和不确定情况下做出决策时的影响。这是一项探索性研究,采用混合方法。所罗门小组的实验设计包括对认知特征(如综合复杂性、认知灵活性和流体智力)的叙述性分析。此外,在实验过程中还将收集神经活动、生理测量和眼动追踪数据,以检验这些过程对决策结果的边际影响及其与 CIT 能力的关系。为了实现这一目标,将有 120 名参与决策的本科生和研究生作为研究对象。研究的大致持续时间为 2 年。在进行实验任务时,将严格遵守相关的伦理考虑。

讨论

该研究将提供有关计算智能工具在复杂和不确定背景下对决策的影响的宝贵信息。这将有助于更好地理解技术与人类行为之间的联系,这具有重要意义。计算智能工具的设计人员可以利用未来的研究成果,同时,当个体使用技术工具来解决问题时,还可以了解认知、行为、生理过程,甚至是个体的主观评估。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/15f6/10553798/8817fe49d96b/pone.0290683.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/15f6/10553798/8817fe49d96b/pone.0290683.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/15f6/10553798/8817fe49d96b/pone.0290683.g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Cognitive modeling for understanding interactions between people and decision support tools in complex and uncertain environments: A study protocol.用于理解复杂和不确定环境中人与决策支持工具之间相互作用的认知建模:研究方案。
PLoS One. 2023 Oct 5;18(10):e0290683. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290683. eCollection 2023.
2
New and emerging technology for adult social care - the example of home sensors with artificial intelligence (AI) technology.成人社会关怀新技术——以具有人工智能 (AI) 技术的家庭传感器为例。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023 Jun;11(9):1-64. doi: 10.3310/HRYW4281.
3
A conceptual and computational model of moral decision making in human and artificial agents.人类和人工智能主体道德决策的概念与计算模型。
Top Cogn Sci. 2010 Jul;2(3):454-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2010.01095.x. Epub 2010 May 13.
4
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
5
Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.人类健康与环境风险的风险管理框架。
J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2003 Nov-Dec;6(6):569-720. doi: 10.1080/10937400390208608.
6
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
7
On the Relationship between Cognitive Ability and Risk Preference.论认知能力与风险偏好的关系。
J Econ Perspect. 2018;32(2):115-34.
8
Recent advances of HCI in decision-making tasks for optimized clinical workflows and precision medicine.HCI 在决策任务中的最新进展,以优化临床工作流程和精准医疗。
J Biomed Inform. 2020 Aug;108:103479. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2020.103479. Epub 2020 Jun 17.
9
Which clinical decisions benefit from automation? A task complexity approach.哪些临床决策能从自动化中受益?一种任务复杂性方法。
Int J Med Inform. 2003 Jul;70(2-3):309-16. doi: 10.1016/s1386-5056(03)00040-6.
10
Decision-making under pressure: medical errors in uncertain and dynamic environments.压力下的决策:不确定和动态环境中的医疗差错
Aust Health Rev. 2018 Aug;42(4):395-402. doi: 10.1071/AH16088.

本文引用的文献

1
Cognitive and behavioural flexibility: neural mechanisms and clinical considerations.认知和行为灵活性:神经机制与临床考量。
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2021 Mar;22(3):167-179. doi: 10.1038/s41583-021-00428-w. Epub 2021 Feb 3.
2
Computational Intelligence for Studying Sustainability Challenges: Tools and Methods for Dealing With Deep Uncertainty and Complexity.用于研究可持续发展挑战的计算智能:应对深度不确定性和复杂性的工具与方法。
Front Robot AI. 2020 Sep 17;7:111. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2020.00111. eCollection 2020.
3
Demystifying artificial intelligence in pharmacy.
揭开药学领域人工智能的神秘面纱。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2020 Sep 18;77(19):1556-1570. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/zxaa218.
4
A review of eye tracking for understanding and improving diagnostic interpretation.关于眼动追踪以理解和改进诊断解读的综述。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2019 Feb 22;4(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s41235-019-0159-2.
5
A Cognitive Modeling Approach to Strategy Formation in Dynamic Decision Making.动态决策中策略形成的认知建模方法
Front Psychol. 2017 Aug 4;8:1335. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01335. eCollection 2017.
6
Negative decision outcomes are more common among people with lower decision-making competence: an item-level analysis of the Decision Outcome Inventory (DOI).负面决策结果在决策能力较低的人群中更为常见:决策结果量表(DOI)的项目层面分析。
Front Psychol. 2015 Apr 7;6:363. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00363. eCollection 2015.
7
Quantifying cerebral asymmetries for language in dextrals and adextrals with random-effects meta analysis.通过随机效应荟萃分析量化右利手和非右利手人群的大脑语言不对称性。
Front Psychol. 2014 Nov 4;5:1128. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01128. eCollection 2014.
8
Can research assessments themselves cause bias in behaviour change trials? A systematic review of evidence from solomon 4-group studies.研究评估本身会导致行为改变试验中的偏差吗?来自所罗门四组研究的系统评价证据。
PLoS One. 2011;6(10):e25223. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0025223. Epub 2011 Oct 19.
9
Development of human visual function.人类视觉功能的发育
Vision Res. 2011 Jul 1;51(13):1588-609. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2011.02.018. Epub 2011 Feb 26.
10
The cognitive processing of politics and politicians: archival studies of conceptual and integrative complexity.政治和政治家的认知处理:概念和综合复杂性的档案研究。
J Pers. 2010 Dec;78(6):1669-702. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00666.x. Epub 2010 Oct 12.