Suppr超能文献

心脏停搏液与血停搏液在儿科心脏手术中的应用:一项随机对照试验。

Custodiol versus blood cardioplegia in pediatric cardiac surgery: a randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Cardiothoracic Surgery Department, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre,, MBC J-16, P.O. Box: 40047, 21499, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

Cardiothoracic Surgery Department, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt.

出版信息

Eur J Med Res. 2023 Oct 5;28(1):404. doi: 10.1186/s40001-023-01372-4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Blood-based cardioplegia is the standard myocardial protection strategy in pediatric cardiac surgery. Custadiol (histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate), an alternative, may have some advantages but is potentially less effective at myocardial protection. This study aimed to test whether custadiol is not inferior to blood-based cardioplegia in pediatric cardiac surgery.

METHODS

The study was designed as a randomized controlled trial with a blinded outcome assessment. All pediatric patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass and cardioplegia, including neonates, were eligible. Emergency surgery was excluded. The primary outcome was a composite of death within 30 days, an ICU stay longer than 5 days, or arrhythmia requiring intervention. Secondary endpoints included total hospital stay, inotropic score, cardiac troponin levels, ventricular function, and extended survival postdischarge. The sample size was determined a priori for a noninferiority design with an expected primary outcome of 40% and a clinical significance difference of 20%.

RESULTS

Between January 2018 and January 2021, 226 patients, divided into the Custodiol cardioplegia (CC) group (n = 107) and the blood cardioplegia (BC) group (n = 119), completed the study protocol. There was no difference in the composite endpoint between the CC and BC groups, 65 (60.75%) vs. 71 (59.66%), respectively (P = 0.87). The total length of stay in the hospital was 14 (Q2-Q3: 10-19) days in the CC group vs. 13 (10-21) days in the BC group (P = 0.85). The inotropic score was not significantly different between the CC and BC groups, 5 (2.6-7.45) vs. 5 (2.6-7.5), respectively (P = 0.82). The cardiac troponin level and ventricular function did not differ significantly between the two groups (P = 0.34 and P = 0.85, respectively). The median duration of follow-up was 32.75 (Q2-Q3: 18.73-41.53) months, and there was no difference in survival between the two groups (log-rank P = 0.55).

CONCLUSIONS

Custodial cardioplegia is not inferior to blood cardioplegia for myocardial protection in pediatric patients. Trial registration The trial was registered in Clinicaltrials.gov, and the ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier number is NCT03082716 Date: 17/03/2017.

摘要

背景

血基心脏停搏液是儿科心脏手术中标准的心肌保护策略。Custadiol(组氨酸-色氨酸-酮戊二酸)是一种替代方案,可能具有一些优势,但在心肌保护方面效果可能较差。本研究旨在测试 Custadiol 是否在儿科心脏手术中不比血基心脏停搏液差。

方法

该研究设计为一项随机对照试验,采用盲法结局评估。所有接受体外循环和心脏停搏液的儿科心脏手术患者,包括新生儿,均符合条件。排除急诊手术。主要结局是 30 天内死亡、重症监护病房住院时间超过 5 天或需要干预的心律失常的复合结局。次要终点包括总住院时间、正性肌力评分、心脏肌钙蛋白水平、心室功能和出院后延长生存时间。根据预期主要结局为 40%和临床差异为 20%的非劣效性设计预先确定了样本量。

结果

2018 年 1 月至 2021 年 1 月,226 名患者分为 Custodiol 心脏停搏液(CC)组(n=107)和血心脏停搏液(BC)组(n=119)完成了研究方案。CC 组和 BC 组之间的复合终点无差异,分别为 65(60.75%)和 71(59.66%)(P=0.87)。CC 组的总住院时间为 14 天(Q2-Q3:10-19),BC 组为 13 天(Q2-Q3:10-21)(P=0.85)。CC 组和 BC 组的正性肌力评分无显著差异,分别为 5(2.6-7.45)和 5(2.6-7.5)(P=0.82)。两组的心脏肌钙蛋白水平和心室功能无显著差异(P=0.34 和 P=0.85)。中位随访时间为 32.75 个月(Q2-Q3:18.73-41.53),两组生存率无差异(对数秩 P=0.55)。

结论

Custodial 心脏停搏液在儿科患者中的心肌保护效果并不逊于血基心脏停搏液。

试验注册

该试验在 ClinicalTrials.gov 上注册,ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符为 NCT03082716,日期:2017 年 3 月 17 日。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验