• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

开发一种基于科学美德的科学伦理培训方法。

Developing a Scientific Virtue-Based Approach to Science Ethics Training.

作者信息

Pennock Robert T, O'Rourke Michael

机构信息

Lyman Briggs College and Departments of Philosophy and Computer Science & Engineering, Michigan State University, 919 E. Shaw Lane, Rm. E35, East Lansing, MI, 48825-3804, USA.

Department of Philosophy and AgBioResearch, Michigan State University, 536 South Kedzie Hall, East Lansing, MI, 48824-1032, USA.

出版信息

Sci Eng Ethics. 2017 Feb;23(1):243-262. doi: 10.1007/s11948-016-9757-2. Epub 2016 Jan 27.

DOI:10.1007/s11948-016-9757-2
PMID:26818458
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5236068/
Abstract

Responsible conduct of research training typically includes only a subset of the issues that ought to be included in science ethics and sometimes makes ethics appear to be a set of externally imposed rules rather than something intrinsic to scientific practice. A new approach to science ethics training based upon Pennock's notion of the scientific virtues may help avoid such problems. This paper motivates and describes three implementations-theory-centered, exemplar-centered, and concept-centered-that we have developed in courses and workshops to introduce students to this scientific virtue-based approach.

摘要

负责任的研究行为培训通常只涵盖了科学伦理中应包含问题的一个子集,有时会使伦理看起来像是一套外部强加的规则,而非科学实践所固有的东西。一种基于彭诺克科学美德概念的科学伦理培训新方法可能有助于避免此类问题。本文阐述并介绍了我们在课程和研讨会上开发的三种实施方式——以理论为中心、以范例为中心和以概念为中心,旨在向学生介绍这种基于科学美德的方法。

相似文献

1
Developing a Scientific Virtue-Based Approach to Science Ethics Training.开发一种基于科学美德的科学伦理培训方法。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2017 Feb;23(1):243-262. doi: 10.1007/s11948-016-9757-2. Epub 2016 Jan 27.
2
A New Method for a Virtue-Based Responsible Conduct of Research Curriculum: Pilot Test Results.基于美德的负责任研究行为课程的新方法:试点测试结果。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2019 Jun;25(3):899-910. doi: 10.1007/s11948-017-9991-2. Epub 2018 Feb 3.
3
The virtue ethics approach to bioethics.美德伦理学方法与生命伦理学。
Bioethics. 2011 May;25(4):192-201. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2009.01758.x.
4
Considering virtue: public health and clinical ethics.论美德:公共卫生与临床伦理。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2011 Oct;17(5):888-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2011.01721.x. Epub 2011 Aug 11.
5
[The virtues in clinical bioethics].[临床生物伦理学中的美德]
Cuad Bioet. 2014 Jan-Apr;25(83):75-91.
6
Perspectives of key stakeholders on essential virtues for good scientific practice in research areas.关键利益相关者对研究领域良好科学实践的基本美德的看法。
Account Res. 2022 Feb;29(2):77-108. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2021.1900739. Epub 2021 Apr 17.
7
Is compliance a professional virtue of researchers? Reflections on promoting the responsible conduct of research.合规是研究人员的职业美德吗?关于促进负责任的研究行为的思考。
Ethics Behav. 2004;14(4):383-95. doi: 10.1207/s15327019eb1404_8.
8
The Virtues of Scientific Practice: MacIntyre, Virtue Ethics, and the Historiography of Science.科学实践的美德:麦金太尔、美德伦理学与科学史编纂学
Isis. 2016 Sep;107(3):449-72. doi: 10.1086/688346.
9
Towards a strong virtue ethics for nursing practice.迈向适用于护理实践的强大美德伦理学。
Nurs Philos. 2006 Jul;7(3):110-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1466-769X.2006.00268.x.
10
"Ethics When You Least Expect It": A Modular Approach to Short Course Data Ethics Instruction.“意料之外的伦理学”:短期课程数据伦理学教学的模块化方法。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2020 Aug;26(4):2189-2213. doi: 10.1007/s11948-020-00197-2. Epub 2020 Feb 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Academic research values: Conceptualization and initial steps of scale development.学术研究价值:量表开发的概念化及初步步骤。
PLoS One. 2025 Mar 25;20(3):e0318086. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0318086. eCollection 2025.
2
Public health and research ethics education: the experience of developing a new cadre of bioethicists at a Ugandan institution.公共卫生与研究伦理教育:乌干达机构培养新一代生物伦理学家的经验。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Jan 3;24(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04974-y.
3
Academic integrity among nursing students: A survey of knowledge and behavior.护生的学术诚信:知识与行为调查
Nurs Ethics. 2024 Jun;31(4):553-571. doi: 10.1177/09697330231200568. Epub 2023 Oct 7.
4
Caught on Camera: On the Need of Responsible Use of Video Observation for Animal Behavior and Welfare Research.镜头捕捉:论动物行为与福利研究中负责任地使用视频观察的必要性。
Front Vet Sci. 2022 Apr 25;9:864677. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.864677. eCollection 2022.
5
Stakeholders' perspectives on research integrity training practices: a qualitative study.利益相关者对研究诚信培训实践的看法:一项定性研究。
BMC Med Ethics. 2021 May 28;22(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00637-z.
6
Perceptions of Work-Related Stress and Ethical Misconduct Amongst Non-tenured Researchers in Italy.意大利非终身制研究人员对工作压力和职业道德失范的认知。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2020 Feb;26(1):159-181. doi: 10.1007/s11948-019-00091-6. Epub 2019 Feb 4.
7
Attending to scalar ethical issues in emerging approaches to environmental health research and practice.关注环境健康研究与实践新方法中的标量伦理问题。
Monash Bioeth Rev. 2019 Oct;37(1-2):4-21. doi: 10.1007/s40592-018-0080-3.
8
A New Method for a Virtue-Based Responsible Conduct of Research Curriculum: Pilot Test Results.基于美德的负责任研究行为课程的新方法:试点测试结果。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2019 Jun;25(3):899-910. doi: 10.1007/s11948-017-9991-2. Epub 2018 Feb 3.

本文引用的文献

1
Intrinsic ethics regarding integrated assessment models for climate management.气候管理综合评估模型的内在伦理问题。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2011 Sep;17(3):503-23. doi: 10.1007/s11948-010-9209-3. Epub 2010 Jun 8.
2
Teaching research ethics: it takes more than good science to make a good scientist.讲授科研伦理:造就优秀科学家所需的不止是出色的科学素养。
Anal Bioanal Chem. 2008 Mar;390(5):1209-15. doi: 10.1007/s00216-007-1800-3.
3
Reasons scientists avoid thinking about ethics.科学家回避思考伦理道德的原因。
Cell. 2006 Jun 16;125(6):1023-5. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.06.001.
4
Six domains of research ethics. A heuristic framework for the responsible conduct of research.研究伦理的六个领域。负责任研究行为的启发式框架。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2002 Apr;8(2):191-205. doi: 10.1007/s11948-002-0018-1.
5
Mentors, advisors and supervisors: their role in teaching responsible research conduct.导师、顾问和监督者:他们在教授负责任的研究行为中的作用。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2001 Jul;7(4):455-68. doi: 10.1007/s11948-001-0002-1.
6
Inappropriate authorship in collaborative science research.合作科研中的不当署名问题。
Public Aff Q. 1996 Oct;10(4):379-93.