Reilly Colin, Jette Nathalie, Johnson Emma C, Kariuki Symon M, Meredith Francesca, Wirrell Elaine, Mula Marco, Smith Mary Lou, Walsh Samantha, Fong Choong Yi, Wilmshurst Jo M, Kerr Mike, Valente Kette, Auvin Stephane
Research Department, Young Epilepsy, Lingfield, UK.
Department of Pediatrics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Epilepsia. 2023 Dec;64(12):3160-3195. doi: 10.1111/epi.17768. Epub 2023 Oct 7.
Limited guidance exists regarding the assessment and management of psychogenic non-epileptic seizures (PNES) in children. Our aim was to develop consensus-based recommendations to fill this gap. The members of the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) Task Force on Pediatric Psychiatric Issues conducted a scoping review adhering to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-SR) standards. This was supplemented with a Delphi process sent to pediatric PNES experts. Consensus was defined as ≥80% agreement. The systematic search identified 77 studies, the majority (55%) of which were retrospective (only one randomized clinical trial). The primary means of PNES identification was video electroencephalography (vEEG) in 84% of studies. Better outcome was associated with access to counseling/psychological intervention. Children with PNES have more frequent psychiatric disorders than controls. The Delphi resulted in 22 recommendations: Assessment-There was consensus on the importance of (1) taking a comprehensive developmental history; (2) obtaining a description of the events; (3) asking about potential stressors; (4) the need to use vEEG if available parent, self, and school reports and video recordings can contribute to a "probable" diagnosis; and (5) that invasive provocation techniques or deceit should not be employed. Management-There was consensus about the (1) need for a professional with expertise in epilepsy to remain involved for a period after PNES diagnosis; (2) provision of appropriate educational materials to the child and caregivers; and (3) that the decision on treatment modality for PNES in children should consider the child's age, cognitive ability, and family factors. Comorbidities-There was consensus that all children with PNES should be screened for mental health and neurodevelopmental difficulties. Recommendations to facilitate the assessment and management of PNES in children were developed. Future directions to fill knowledge gaps were proposed.
关于儿童心因性非癫痫性发作(PNES)的评估和管理,目前可用的指导有限。我们的目标是制定基于共识的建议以填补这一空白。国际抗癫痫联盟(ILAE)儿童精神科问题特别工作组的成员进行了一项范围综述,遵循系统评价和Meta分析扩展版的首选报告项目(PRISMA-SR)标准。此外还向儿童PNES专家发送了德尔菲法调查问卷。共识定义为达成≥80%的一致意见。系统检索确定了77项研究,其中大多数(55%)为回顾性研究(仅有一项随机临床试验)。在84%的研究中,PNES识别的主要手段是视频脑电图(vEEG)。获得咨询/心理干预与更好的结果相关。患有PNES的儿童比对照组有更频繁的精神障碍。德尔菲法产生了22条建议:评估方面,对于以下几点的重要性达成了共识:(1)获取全面的发育史;(2)了解发作事件的描述;(3)询问潜在的压力源;(4)如果有可用的家长、自我和学校报告以及视频记录有助于做出“可能的”诊断,则需要使用vEEG;(5)不应采用侵入性激发技术或欺骗手段。管理方面,对于以下几点达成了共识:(1)在PNES诊断后,需要有癫痫专业知识的专业人员持续参与一段时间;(2)向儿童及其照顾者提供适当的教育材料;(3)儿童PNES治疗方式的决策应考虑儿童的年龄、认知能力和家庭因素。共病方面,达成的共识是所有患有PNES的儿童都应接受心理健康和神经发育障碍筛查。制定了有助于儿童PNES评估和管理的建议。提出了填补知识空白的未来方向。