Suppr超能文献

多问题残疾福利金受领者重返劳动力市场综合方法(CARm)的过程评估。

Process evaluation of a comprehensive approach to reintegration of disability benefit recipients with multiple problems (CARm) into the labour market.

机构信息

Department of Health Sciences, Community and Occupational Medicine, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.

Research Center for Labour Expertise, Nijkerk, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Disabil Rehabil. 2024 Sep;46(18):4157-4167. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2023.2264765. Epub 2023 Oct 8.

Abstract

PURPOSE

As the effect evaluation of our randomized controlled trial the "Comprehensive Approach of Reintegration for clients with Multiple problems" (CARm) showed no superior effect on re-integration into paid employment of the clients when compared with clients of the care as usual, we conducted this process evaluation to gain insight into whether the intervention was conducted according to protocol.

METHODS

Using questionnaires on recruitment, reach, dose delivered, dose received, fidelity, context, and satisfaction we collected data from 40 labour experts of the Public Employment Service of the Dutch Social Security Institute, and from 166 disability benefit recipients dealing with multiple problems.

RESULTS

Only few of the labour experts provided the key elements of the intervention to their clients. Between the clients of both groups were no significant differences in the dose received. More than half of the labour experts of the intervention group reported organizational changes.

CONCLUSION

The lack of effect of the CARm intervention was almost certainly caused by implementation failure. Once again this study showed the importance of involving all stakeholders in developing and the conduct of the intervention, and of clarifying the consequences for the organization, to ensure that it can be conducted according to protocol.

摘要

目的

由于我们的随机对照试验“多问题客户综合再融入方法”(CARm)的效果评估显示,与常规护理的客户相比,该方法在客户重新融入有偿就业方面没有优越的效果,因此我们进行了这项过程评估,以深入了解干预措施是否符合方案。

方法

我们使用了关于招募、可及性、提供的剂量、接受的剂量、保真度、背景和满意度的问卷,从荷兰社会保障研究所公共就业服务的 40 名劳动专家以及 166 名患有多种问题的残疾福利受助人那里收集数据。

结果

只有少数劳动专家向他们的客户提供了干预的关键要素。两组客户接受的剂量之间没有显著差异。干预组的一半以上劳动专家报告了组织变革。

结论

CARm 干预措施无效的原因几乎肯定是实施失败。这项研究再次表明,让所有利益相关者参与干预的制定和实施,并明确对组织的影响,以确保其符合方案,是非常重要的。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验