Suppr超能文献

序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分、全身炎症反应综合征(SIRS)、快速序贯器官衰竭评估(qSOFA)及qSOFA+L标准在脓毒症诊断和预后中的比较

Comparison of SOFA Score, SIRS, qSOFA, and qSOFA + L Criteria in the Diagnosis and Prognosis of Sepsis.

作者信息

Kilinc Toker Aysin, Kose Sukran, Turken Melda

机构信息

Department of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Kayseri City Hospital, Kayseri, Turkey.

Department of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Tepecik Training and Education Hospital, Izmir, Turkey.

出版信息

Eurasian J Med. 2021 Feb;53(1):40-47. doi: 10.5152/eurasianjmed.2021.20081.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Sepsis has been defined as a life-threatening organ dysfunction that develops as a result of impaired host response to infection. This study aimed to investigate sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score, systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), quick SOFA (qSOFA), and qSOFA + lactate criteria (qSOFA+L) in the diagnosis and prognosis of sepsis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective study was performed that included all patients diagnosed with sepsis between January 1, 2013 and December 31, 2017 in Izmir Tepecik Training and Research Hospital Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology Clinic.

RESULTS

A total of 976 patients diagnosed with sepsis (mean age 72.5±13.7 years, 52.7% women) over five years were included in this study. Of all patients admitted to the emergency department and diagnosed with sepsis, 37.4% (n=365) were hospitalized and 52.3% (n=191) of these patients died. Emergency department mortality was 12.5% (n=122). The mortality rate was higher in patients with qSOFA and qSOFA+L criteria ≥2 in the emergency department. There was no statistically significant difference in terms of SIRS, qSOFA, or qSOFA+L criteria among patients who died in the hospital. The SOFA score (area under receiver operator characteristic curve, AUC=0.89) was highly discriminative in predicting sepsis. When the SOFA score was>11, its sensitivity and negative predictive values were both 100%. The SOFA score (AUC=0.75 and 0.72, respectively) was also highly discriminative in predicting emergency and in-hospital mortality. When the SOFA score was>11, the sensitivity and specificity of predicting emergency department mortality were 63.5% and 78.8%, respectively. The sensitivity was 65.8% and the specificity was 75.5% when describing in-hospital mortality for SOFA scores>9.

CONCLUSION

The SOFA score was highly sensitive and predictive in the diagnosis of sepsis. The SOFA score had a high discriminative ability to predict emergency and in-hospital mortality.

摘要

目的

脓毒症被定义为因宿主对感染的反应受损而发展的危及生命的器官功能障碍。本研究旨在探讨序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分、全身炎症反应综合征(SIRS)、快速SOFA(qSOFA)以及qSOFA+乳酸标准(qSOFA+L)在脓毒症诊断和预后中的作用。

材料与方法

进行了一项回顾性研究,纳入了2013年1月1日至2017年12月31日期间在伊兹密尔泰佩奇克培训与研究医院传染病与临床微生物学诊所被诊断为脓毒症的所有患者。

结果

本研究共纳入了976例在五年内被诊断为脓毒症的患者(平均年龄72.5±13.7岁,女性占52.7%)。在所有入住急诊科并被诊断为脓毒症的患者中,37.4%(n=365)住院治疗,其中52.3%(n=191)的患者死亡。急诊科死亡率为12.5%(n=122)。在急诊科qSOFA和qSOFA+L标准≥2的患者死亡率更高。在医院死亡的患者中,SIRS、qSOFA或qSOFA+L标准方面无统计学显著差异。SOFA评分(受试者操作特征曲线下面积,AUC=0.89)在预测脓毒症方面具有高度鉴别力。当SOFA评分>11时,其敏感性和阴性预测值均为100%。SOFA评分(AUC分别为0.75和0.72)在预测急诊科和院内死亡率方面也具有高度鉴别力。当SOFA评分>11时,预测急诊科死亡率的敏感性和特异性分别为63.5%和78.8%。当描述SOFA评分>9时的院内死亡率时,敏感性为65.8%,特异性为75.5%。

结论

SOFA评分在脓毒症诊断中具有高度敏感性和预测性。SOFA评分在预测急诊科和院内死亡率方面具有很高的鉴别能力。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

3
New Sepsis and Septic Shock Definitions: Clinical Implications and Controversies.新的脓毒症和脓毒性休克定义:临床意义与争议
Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2017 Sep;31(3):397-413. doi: 10.1016/j.idc.2017.05.001. Epub 2017 Jul 5.
9
New Sepsis Criteria: A Change We Should Not Make.新的脓毒症标准:一项我们不应做出的改变。
Chest. 2016 May;149(5):1117-8. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2016.02.653. Epub 2016 Feb 27.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验