Suppr超能文献

急诊科感染性休克患者初始及24小时最高序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分的预后准确性

Prognostic accuracy of initial and 24-h maximum SOFA scores of septic shock patients in the emergency department.

作者信息

Kim Tae Han, Jeong Daun, Park Jong Eun, Hwang Sung Yeon, Suh Gil Joon, Choi Sung-Hyuk, Chung Sung Phil, Kim Won Young, Lee Gun Tak, Shin Tae Gun

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Department of Emergency Medicine, College of Medicine, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon, Gangwon-do, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Heliyon. 2023 Aug 28;9(9):e19480. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19480. eCollection 2023 Sep.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

We compared the prognostic accuracy of in-hospital mortality of the initial Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score at the time of sepsis recognition and resuscitation and the maximum SOFA score (SOFA) using the worst variables in the 24 h after the initial score measurement in emergency department (ED) patients with septic shock.

METHODS

This was a retrospective observational study using a multicenter prospective registry of septic shock patients in the ED between October 2015 and December 2019. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. The prognostic accuracies of SOFA and SOFA were evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUC) curve.

RESULTS

A total of 4860 patients was included, and the in-hospital mortality was 22.1%. In 59.7% of patients, SOFA increased compared with SOFA, and the mean change of total SOFA score was 2.0 (standard deviation, 2.3). There was a significant difference in in-hospital mortality according to total SOFA score and the SOFA component scores, except cardiovascular SOFA score. The AUC of SOFA (0.71; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.69-0.72) was significantly higher than that of SOFA (AUC, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.66-0.69) in predicting in-hospital mortality. The AUCs of all scores of the six components were higher for the maximum values.

CONCLUSION

The prognostic accuracy of the initial SOFA score at the time of sepsis recognition was lower than the 24-h maximal SOFA score in ED patients with septic shock. Follow-up assessments of organ failure may improve discrimination of the SOFA score for predicting mortality.

摘要

背景

我们比较了脓毒症识别与复苏时初始序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分以及在急诊科(ED)感染性休克患者初始评分测量后24小时内使用最差变量的最高SOFA评分对院内死亡率的预测准确性。

方法

这是一项回顾性观察研究,使用了2015年10月至2019年12月期间ED感染性休克患者的多中心前瞻性登记数据。主要结局为院内死亡率。使用受试者操作特征(AUC)曲线下面积评估SOFA和SOFA的预测准确性。

结果

共纳入4860例患者,院内死亡率为22.1%。59.7%的患者SOFA较初始值升高,SOFA总分的平均变化为2.0(标准差,2.3)。除心血管SOFA评分外,根据SOFA总分和SOFA各分项评分,院内死亡率存在显著差异。在预测院内死亡率方面,SOFA的AUC(0.71;95%置信区间[CI],0.69 - 0.72)显著高于SOFA的AUC(AUC,0.67;95%CI,0.66 - 0.69)。六个组成部分的所有评分的AUC在取最大值时更高。

结论

在ED感染性休克患者中,脓毒症识别时初始SOFA评分的预测准确性低于24小时最高SOFA评分。对器官衰竭进行随访评估可能会提高SOFA评分预测死亡率的辨别力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2774/10558605/b2ff66792185/gr1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验