Xiangya School of Nursing, Central South University, 172 Tongzipo Road, Changsha, Hunan 410013, China.
Xiangya School of Nursing, Central South University, 172 Tongzipo Road, Changsha, Hunan 410013, China; Xiangya Center for Evidence-Based Practice & Healthcare Innovation: A Joanna Briggs Institute Affiliated Group, 172 Tongzipo Road, Changsha, Hunan 410013, China.
Nurse Educ Pract. 2023 Oct;72:103798. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2023.103798. Epub 2023 Oct 3.
The goal of this systematic review was to systematically evaluate the psychometric properties of existing patient health education competence instruments.
The patient health education competence of nursing personnel is a crucial factor that determines the quality of patient education, patients' quality of life, and patients' health-related outcomes. Although different instruments have been developed to assess patient health education competence, there is no comprehensive and rigorous systematic review to provide an overview and critical appraisal on these instruments. Therefore, a comprehensive systematic review of the measurement properties of such instruments is necessary.
A systematic review based on COSMIN methodology.
In this study, six English databases and two Chinese databases were systematically searched for relevant publications, to retrieve studies that include instrument(s) measuring the patient health education competence of nursing personnel. Two researchers independently performed literature screening, data extraction, and literature evaluation.
A total of 13 studies reporting 11 eligible instruments were included. No studies have reported cross-cultural validity, measurement error, or responsiveness of the instruments.
Based on the findings of this study, five instruments were recommended as Grade A, and the remaining six instruments were recommended as Grade B. The Nurse Health Education Competence Instrument is considered the most appropriate tool for assessing patient health education competence among the available instruments. Future related instrument development should be based on more rigorous testing and reporting, to ensure the validity and reliability of the instruments.
本系统评价旨在系统评估现有的患者健康教育能力工具的心理测量学特性。
护理人员的患者健康教育能力是决定患者教育质量、患者生活质量和患者健康相关结局的关键因素。尽管已经开发了不同的工具来评估患者健康教育能力，但没有全面和严格的系统评价来概述和评价这些工具。因此，有必要对这些工具的测量特性进行全面的系统评价。
基于 COSMIN 方法的系统评价。
本研究系统检索了六个英文数据库和两个中文数据库中的相关文献，以检索评估护理人员患者健康教育能力的工具的研究。两名研究人员独立进行文献筛选、数据提取和文献评价。
共纳入 13 项研究，报道了 11 项合格的工具。没有研究报告工具的跨文化有效性、测量误差或反应性。
根据本研究的结果，有 5 个工具被推荐为 A 级，其余 6 个工具被推荐为 B 级。护士健康教育能力量表被认为是现有工具中评估患者健康教育能力最适宜的工具。未来相关工具的开发应基于更严格的测试和报告，以确保工具的有效性和可靠性。
