Dunbar Alayna, Heinlen Jonathan, Slobodov Gennady, Meenakshi-Sundaram Bhalaajee, Furr James
Department of Urology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.
Transl Androl Urol. 2023 Sep 30;12(9):1408-1415. doi: 10.21037/tau-23-105. Epub 2023 Sep 14.
Decisional regret (DR) has previously been applied to other urologic issues (hypospadias, prostate cancer). The present study seeks to evaluate certain patient factors that directly correlate to high DR scores in anti-incontinence procedures.
Medical records for 119 patients undergoing anti-incontinence procedures between 2009 and 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Forty-one patients were accessible for telephone follow-up and provided a Decisional Regret Scale (DRS) questionnaire. If patients had both a sling and an artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) placed, questionnaires were administered for each. DRS score was quantified in accordance with prior literature, with scores ranging 0-100. We subdivided patients based on demographics and surgical data, correlating this with DRS score.
In 41 patients, 46 procedures (13 slings, 33 AUS) were performed. Thirty-nine (95.1%) men underwent robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy, and 11 (26.8%) men reported prior pelvic radiation. Post-procedural continence, irrespective of procedure, yielded an average 2±1.56 pads per day (PPD). Mean DRS score across the cohort was 29.78. DRS score was subdivided into mild, moderate, and severe, with majority noting "none to mild" regret (63%), 15.2% reporting moderate and 21.7% severe. Predictors of higher regret included history of radiation (P=0.056), choice of anti-incontinence procedure (P=0.011), and need for surgical revision (P=0.00042). DR was unrelated to race, complete continence, and time to follow-up.
DRS has recently been applied to anti-incontinence procedures for male stress incontinence; our study highlights novel findings not previously assessed. Majority of men had minimal regret with a subset that had significant regret-history of radiation, multiple revisions/explant, and those who elected for sling upfront. These results highlight the importance of patient selection and pre-operative counselling.
决策后悔(DR)此前已应用于其他泌尿外科问题(尿道下裂、前列腺癌)。本研究旨在评估与抗尿失禁手术中高DR评分直接相关的某些患者因素。
回顾性分析2009年至2020年间119例行抗尿失禁手术患者的病历。41例患者可进行电话随访,并提供了决策后悔量表(DRS)问卷。如果患者同时放置了吊带和人工尿道括约肌(AUS),则对每种情况都进行问卷调查。DRS评分根据先前文献进行量化,评分范围为0-100。我们根据人口统计学和手术数据对患者进行细分,并将其与DRS评分相关联。
41例患者共进行了46次手术(13次吊带手术,33次AUS手术)。39例(95.1%)男性接受了机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术,11例(26.8%)男性报告曾接受盆腔放疗。术后控尿情况,无论采用何种手术,平均每天使用2±1.56片尿垫(PPD)。整个队列的平均DRS评分为29.78。DRS评分分为轻度、中度和重度,大多数人表示“无至轻度”后悔(63%),15.2%报告为中度,21.7%为重度。后悔程度较高的预测因素包括放疗史(P=0.056)、抗尿失禁手术的选择(P=0.011)以及手术修复的必要性(P=0.00042)。DR与种族、完全控尿以及随访时间无关。
DRS最近已应用于男性压力性尿失禁的抗尿失禁手术;我们的研究突出了以前未评估的新发现。大多数男性后悔程度最小,而一部分人后悔程度较高——放疗史、多次修复/取出以及那些一开始选择吊带手术的人。这些结果突出了患者选择和术前咨询的重要性。