• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关于 TikTok 上幽门螺杆菌感染相关视频的信息质量:横断面研究。

Information quality of videos related to Helicobacter pylori infection on TikTok: Cross-sectional study.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Helicobacter. 2024 Jan-Feb;29(1):e13029. doi: 10.1111/hel.13029. Epub 2023 Oct 12.

DOI:10.1111/hel.13029
PMID:37823482
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) poses serious threats to human health. TikTok (Douyin in Chinese), a major social media platform focused on sharing short videos, has demonstrated great potential in spreading health information, including information related to H. pylori infection. This study aims to evaluate the content and quality of the information shared in TikTok videos about H. pylori infection in mainland China.

METHODS

We collected a sample of 116 videos in Chinese related to H. pylori infection from TikTok. Video contents were evaluated by the coding schema proposed by Goobie et al., and the Hexagonal Radar Schema was used to intuitively display the spotlight and weight of each aspect of the videos. The DISCERN questionnaire was used to evaluate the quality of the videos.

RESULTS

We identified two major sources of videos related to H. pylori: individual users (n = 89) and organizational users (n = 27). Regarding content, the Hexagonal Radar Charts showed that more than 35% of the videos delivered moderate to high quality content (>1 point) in terms of definition, symptoms and management of the disease, whereas risk factors, evaluation and outcomes of the disease were less discussed. The DISCERN classification data showed that 0.9% of the videos were "very poor," 5.2% "poor," 68.7% "fair," 20.0% "good," and only 5.2% "excellent". Regarding total DISCERN scores, videos published by nonprofit organizations had the highest scores, followed by videos uploaded by health professionals.

CONCLUSION

Although the overall quality of TikTok videos related to H. pylori infection was medium, users should be careful when obtaining information related to H. pylori infection on TikTok and opt for videos uploaded by nonprofit organizations and health professionals.

摘要

背景

幽门螺杆菌(H. pylori)对人类健康构成严重威胁。TikTok(中文名为抖音)是一个专注于分享短视频的主要社交媒体平台,在传播健康信息方面具有巨大潜力,包括与 H. pylori 感染相关的信息。本研究旨在评估中国大陆 TikTok 视频中关于 H. pylori 感染的信息内容和质量。

方法

我们从 TikTok 上收集了 116 个中文相关的 H. pylori 感染视频。使用 Goobie 等人提出的编码方案对视频内容进行评估,并使用六边形雷达图直观地显示视频各方面的重点和权重。使用 DISCERN 问卷评估视频质量。

结果

我们确定了两种与 H. pylori 相关的视频来源:个人用户(n=89)和组织用户(n=27)。关于内容,六边形雷达图显示,超过 35%的视频在疾病的定义、症状和管理方面提供了中等到高质量的内容(>1 分),而疾病的风险因素、评估和结果则讨论较少。DISCERN 分类数据显示,0.9%的视频为“非常差”,5.2%为“差”,68.7%为“一般”,20.0%为“好”,只有 5.2%为“优秀”。关于总 DISCERN 评分,非营利组织发布的视频得分最高,其次是健康专业人员上传的视频。

结论

尽管 TikTok 上与 H. pylori 感染相关的视频整体质量中等,但用户在 TikTok 上获取与 H. pylori 感染相关的信息时应谨慎,选择由非营利组织和健康专业人员上传的视频。

相似文献

1
Information quality of videos related to Helicobacter pylori infection on TikTok: Cross-sectional study.关于 TikTok 上幽门螺杆菌感染相关视频的信息质量:横断面研究。
Helicobacter. 2024 Jan-Feb;29(1):e13029. doi: 10.1111/hel.13029. Epub 2023 Oct 12.
2
TikTok and Bilibili as sources of information on Helicobacter pylori in China: A content and quality analysis.中国的TikTok和哔哩哔哩作为幽门螺杆菌信息来源:内容与质量分析
Helicobacter. 2023 Oct;28(5):e13007. doi: 10.1111/hel.13007. Epub 2023 Jul 15.
3
The status quo of short videos as a health information source of : a cross-sectional study.短视频作为健康信息来源的现状:一项横断面研究。
Front Public Health. 2024 Jan 8;11:1344212. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1344212. eCollection 2023.
4
The Quality of Short Videos as a Source of Coronary Heart Disease Information on TikTok: Cross-Sectional Study.短视频质量作为 TikTok 冠心病信息来源的研究:横断面研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Sep 3;8:e51513. doi: 10.2196/51513.
5
Quality and Reliability of Liver Cancer-Related Short Chinese Videos on TikTok and Bilibili: Cross-Sectional Content Analysis Study.肝癌相关短视频在 TikTok 和 Bilibili 上的质量与可靠性:一项横断面内容分析研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jul 5;25:e47210. doi: 10.2196/47210.
6
Quality of Internet Videos Related to Pediatric Urology in Mainland China: A Cross-Sectional Study.中国大陆小儿泌尿外科相关互联网视频质量的横断面研究。
Front Public Health. 2022 Jun 15;10:924748. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.924748. eCollection 2022.
7
YouTube/ Bilibili/ TikTok videos as sources of medical information on laryngeal carcinoma: cross-sectional content analysis study.YouTube/ Bilibili/ TikTok 视频作为喉癌医学信息来源:横断面内容分析研究。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jun 14;24(1):1594. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19077-6.
8
Short-Video Apps as a Health Information Source for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Information Quality Assessment of TikTok Videos.短视频应用作为慢性阻塞性肺疾病的健康信息来源:TikTok 视频的信息质量评估。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Dec 20;23(12):e28318. doi: 10.2196/28318.
9
TikTok as a Health Information Source: Assessment of the Quality of Information in Diabetes-Related Videos.TikTok 作为健康信息来源:糖尿病相关视频信息质量评估。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Sep 1;23(9):e30409. doi: 10.2196/30409.
10
Quality of Information in Gallstone Disease Videos on TikTok: Cross-sectional Study.TikTok 胆囊疾病相关视频信息质量:一项横断面研究
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Feb 8;25:e39162. doi: 10.2196/39162.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing the quality of myopia prevention videos on Chinese short video platforms: a cross-sectional content analysis by source.评估中国短视频平台上近视预防视频的质量:基于来源的横断面内容分析
BMJ Open. 2025 Aug 21;15(8):e102818. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-102818.
2
Information quality of videos related to esophageal cancer on tiktok, kwai, and bilibili: a cross-sectional study.抖音、快手和哔哩哔哩上与食管癌相关视频的信息质量:一项横断面研究。
BMC Public Health. 2025 Jul 2;25(1):2245. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23475-9.
3
Knowledge, attitude, and practice toward Helicobacter pylori among residents in Northeast China‌.
中国东北地区居民对幽门螺杆菌的认知、态度及行为
Sci Rep. 2025 May 1;15(1):15288. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-00323-9.
4
Evaluating the Content and Quality of Videos Related to Hypertrophic Scarring on TikTok in China: Cross-Sectional Study.评估中国TikTok上与肥厚性瘢痕相关视频的内容和质量:横断面研究。
JMIR Infodemiology. 2025 Apr 29;5:e64792. doi: 10.2196/64792.
5
Descriptive analysis of TikTok content on vaccination in Arabic.阿拉伯语TikTok上关于疫苗接种内容的描述性分析。
AIMS Public Health. 2025 Jan 17;12(1):137-161. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2025010. eCollection 2025.
6
Analyzing dissemination, quality, and reliability of Chinese brain tumor-related short videos on TikTok and Bilibili: a cross-sectional study.分析TikTok和哔哩哔哩上与脑肿瘤相关的中文短视频的传播、质量和可靠性:一项横断面研究。
Front Neurol. 2024 Oct 18;15:1404038. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1404038. eCollection 2024.
7
The status quo of short videos as a health information source of : a cross-sectional study.短视频作为健康信息来源的现状:一项横断面研究。
Front Public Health. 2024 Jan 8;11:1344212. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1344212. eCollection 2023.