Li Meilin, Liang Rong-Bin, Zhou Yulu, Wang Kun, Yang Rundong, Li Tao, Zhou Xiaodong
Department of Ophthalmology, Jinshan Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Department of Ophthalmology, Zhejiang University School of Medicine Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Hangzhou, China.
BMJ Open. 2025 Aug 21;15(8):e102818. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-102818.
The prevalence of myopia has been rising, whereas prevention efforts have shown limited success. Educational short videos have become crucial sources for health information; however, their quality regarding myopia prevention is uncertain. This study aimed to evaluate the quality and content of short videos on myopia prevention disseminated via major Chinese short video platforms and compare content differences between healthcare professionals and non-professional creators.
A cross-sectional content analysis.
Top-ranked videos from three dominant Chinese platforms (TikTok, Kwai and BiliBili) in 6-10 August 2024.
284 eligible videos screened from 300 initial results using predefined exclusion criteria, including 97 videos from TikTok, 94 from BiliBili and 93 from Kwai.
Videos were assessed using the Global Quality Scale and a modified DISCERN tool. Content completeness was evaluated across six predefined domains. Videos were categorised by source (healthcare professionals vs non-healthcare professionals), and intergroup differences were statistically analysed.
Of the 284 videos, 48.9% were uploaded by healthcare professionals and 51.1% by non-healthcare professionals. Overall video quality was suboptimal. Videos by ophthalmologists had significantly higher quality scores than those by other creators. Healthcare professionals focused more on definitions, symptoms and risk factors of myopia, whereas non-healthcare professionals emphasised prevention and treatment outcomes. Ophthalmologists more frequently recommended corrective lenses (including both standard spectacles and specially designed lenses for myopia control) and low-dose atropine, whereas non-healthcare professionals favoured vision training.
Significant quality gaps exist in myopia prevention videos. Healthcare professionals, particularly ophthalmologists, produce higher-quality and more comprehensive content. Strategic engagement by healthcare professionals in digital health communication and platform-level quality control is needed to improve public health literacy on myopia.
近视患病率一直在上升,而预防措施成效有限。教育短视频已成为健康信息的重要来源;然而,其关于近视预防的质量尚不确定。本研究旨在评估通过中国主要短视频平台传播的近视预防短视频的质量和内容,并比较医疗保健专业人员与非专业创作者之间的内容差异。
横断面内容分析。
2024年8月6日至10日来自中国三个主流平台(抖音、快手和哔哩哔哩)的排名靠前的视频。
使用预定义的排除标准从300个初始结果中筛选出284个符合条件的视频,其中包括抖音的97个视频、哔哩哔哩的94个视频和快手的93个视频。
使用全球质量量表和改良的DISCERN工具对视频进行评估。在六个预定义领域评估内容完整性。视频按来源(医疗保健专业人员与非医疗保健专业人员)分类,并对组间差异进行统计分析。
在284个视频中,48.9%由医疗保健专业人员上传,51.1%由非医疗保健专业人员上传。总体视频质量欠佳。眼科医生上传的视频质量得分显著高于其他创作者。医疗保健专业人员更关注近视的定义、症状和危险因素,而非医疗保健专业人员则强调预防和治疗效果。眼科医生更频繁地推荐矫正镜片(包括标准眼镜和专门设计的近视控制镜片)和低剂量阿托品,而非医疗保健专业人员则更倾向于视力训练。
近视预防视频存在显著的质量差距。医疗保健专业人员,尤其是眼科医生,制作的内容质量更高、更全面。需要医疗保健专业人员在数字健康传播和平台层面的质量控制方面进行战略参与,以提高公众对近视的健康素养。