• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估中国TikTok上与肥厚性瘢痕相关视频的内容和质量:横断面研究。

Evaluating the Content and Quality of Videos Related to Hypertrophic Scarring on TikTok in China: Cross-Sectional Study.

作者信息

Wang Jiangkun, Xu Kai, Wu Juanjuan, Liang Wen, Qiu Weiming, Wang Song

机构信息

Department of Burns and Plastic Surgery, General Hospital of Central Theater Command, Wuhan, China.

School of Medicine, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.

出版信息

JMIR Infodemiology. 2025 Apr 29;5:e64792. doi: 10.2196/64792.

DOI:10.2196/64792
PMID:40300161
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12076032/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Hypertrophic scars (HTSs) are a predominant condition after burns and trauma, and it causes severe physiological and psychological problems. TikTok (Douyin in Chinese), a popular platform for sharing short videos, has shown the potential to spread health information, including information related to HTSs. Educating the public to obtain correct information is important to reduce the incidence of physiological and psychological problems caused by HTSs. However, the quality and reliability of HTS-related video content on TikTok in mainland China have not been thoroughly studied.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to evaluate the content and quality of short videos related to HTSs on the Chinese version of TikTok (Douyin) and explore the factors related to their quality, providing valuable insights for health information dissemination.

METHODS

We collected a sample of 153 TikTok videos in Chinese related to HTSs and categorized them according to video source and content. We evaluated the video content using a coding schema, and a hexagonal radar schema was used to intuitively display the spotlight and weight of each aspect of the videos. We evaluated quality using 4 standardized tools: the modified DISCERN (mDISCERN) questionnaire, the Journal of the American Medical Association, the Global Quality Scale (GQS), and the Health on the Net Foundation Code of Conduct. We also explored the potential relationship between video quality and characteristics.

RESULTS

The analysis showed that health care professionals uploaded all videos about treating HTSs, which matched the hexagonal radar model analysis findings. The quality assessment scores for the Journal of the American Medical Association, GQS, mDISCERN, and the Health on the Net Foundation Code of Conduct had median values of 1 (IQR 1-2), 2 (IQR 2-3), 2 (IQR 2-3), and 3 (IQR 3-4), respectively, indicating a need to improve the quality and reliability of videos on HTSs. In addition, high-quality videos were more popular, based on metrics such as likes, comments, favorites, and shares (P<.001). Interestingly, the time when the videos were uploaded positively correlated with GQS and mDISCERN scores (r=0.393; P<.001 and r=0.273; P<.001), while the video length did not significantly correlate with evaluation scores (P=.78, P=.20, P=.07, and P=.04).

CONCLUSIONS

The quality of TikTok videos related to HTSs is generally moderate. Users should exercise caution when seeking information on HTSs from TikTok. It is advisable to choose videos uploaded by health care professionals from the burn department and the burn plastic surgery department, and in the Chinese context, those produced in first-tier cities and emerging first-tier cities.

摘要

背景

增生性瘢痕(HTS)是烧伤和创伤后的主要病症,会引发严重的生理和心理问题。抖音是一个热门短视频分享平台,已显示出传播健康信息的潜力,包括与增生性瘢痕相关的信息。教育公众获取正确信息对于减少增生性瘢痕导致的生理和心理问题的发生率至关重要。然而,中国大陆抖音上与增生性瘢痕相关的视频内容的质量和可靠性尚未得到充分研究。

目的

本研究旨在评估中文版抖音上与增生性瘢痕相关的短视频的内容和质量,并探索与其质量相关的因素,为健康信息传播提供有价值的见解。

方法

我们收集了153条中文抖音上与增生性瘢痕相关的视频样本,并根据视频来源和内容进行分类。我们使用编码方案评估视频内容,并使用六边形雷达图直观展示视频各方面的重点和权重。我们使用4种标准化工具评估质量:改良的DISCERN(mDISCERN)问卷、《美国医学会杂志》、全球质量量表(GQS)和网络健康基金会行为准则。我们还探索了视频质量与特征之间的潜在关系。

结果

分析表明,所有关于增生性瘢痕治疗的视频均由医护人员上传,这与六边形雷达模型分析结果相符。《美国医学会杂志》、GQS、mDISCERN和网络健康基金会行为准则的质量评估得分中位数分别为1(四分位间距1 - 2)、2(四分位间距2 - 3)、2(四分位间距2 - 3)和3(四分位间距3 - 4),表明需要提高增生性瘢痕相关视频的质量和可靠性。此外,基于点赞、评论、收藏和分享等指标,高质量视频更受欢迎(P <.001)。有趣的是,视频上传时间与GQS和mDISCERN得分呈正相关(r = 0.393;P <.001和r = 0.273;P <.001),而视频长度与评估得分无显著相关性(P =.78、P =.20、P =.07和P =.04)。

结论

抖音上与增生性瘢痕相关的视频质量普遍中等。用户在从抖音上寻求增生性瘢痕相关信息时应谨慎。建议选择由烧伤科和烧伤整形外科的医护人员上传的视频,在中国背景下,优先选择一线城市和新一线城市制作的视频。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c129/12076032/0cfeddad1316/infodemiology_v5i1e64792_fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c129/12076032/79e7c431bcfb/infodemiology_v5i1e64792_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c129/12076032/55aa7b8317a2/infodemiology_v5i1e64792_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c129/12076032/79e174db08f4/infodemiology_v5i1e64792_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c129/12076032/48829879520a/infodemiology_v5i1e64792_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c129/12076032/0cfeddad1316/infodemiology_v5i1e64792_fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c129/12076032/79e7c431bcfb/infodemiology_v5i1e64792_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c129/12076032/55aa7b8317a2/infodemiology_v5i1e64792_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c129/12076032/79e174db08f4/infodemiology_v5i1e64792_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c129/12076032/48829879520a/infodemiology_v5i1e64792_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c129/12076032/0cfeddad1316/infodemiology_v5i1e64792_fig5.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluating the Content and Quality of Videos Related to Hypertrophic Scarring on TikTok in China: Cross-Sectional Study.评估中国TikTok上与肥厚性瘢痕相关视频的内容和质量:横断面研究。
JMIR Infodemiology. 2025 Apr 29;5:e64792. doi: 10.2196/64792.
2
The Quality of Short Videos as a Source of Coronary Heart Disease Information on TikTok: Cross-Sectional Study.短视频质量作为 TikTok 冠心病信息来源的研究:横断面研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Sep 3;8:e51513. doi: 10.2196/51513.
3
Quality Assessment of TikTok as a Source of Information About Mitral Valve Regurgitation in China: Cross-Sectional Study.中国关于二尖瓣反流的信息来源——TikTok 质量评估:横断面研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Aug 20;26:e55403. doi: 10.2196/55403.
4
Evaluation of Douyin Short Videos on Mammography in China: Quality and Reliability Analysis.中国抖音乳腺钼靶摄影短视频的评估:质量与可靠性分析
JMIR Cancer. 2025 Feb 19;11:e59483. doi: 10.2196/59483.
5
Quality and Reliability of Liver Cancer-Related Short Chinese Videos on TikTok and Bilibili: Cross-Sectional Content Analysis Study.肝癌相关短视频在 TikTok 和 Bilibili 上的质量与可靠性:一项横断面内容分析研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jul 5;25:e47210. doi: 10.2196/47210.
6
Assessment of the reliability and quality of breast cancer related videos on TikTok and Bilibili: cross-sectional study in China.TikTok和哔哩哔哩上乳腺癌相关视频的可靠性和质量评估:中国的横断面研究
Front Public Health. 2024 Jan 22;11:1296386. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1296386. eCollection 2023.
7
Quality of Information in Gallstone Disease Videos on TikTok: Cross-sectional Study.TikTok 胆囊疾病相关视频信息质量:一项横断面研究
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Feb 8;25:e39162. doi: 10.2196/39162.
8
Evaluating the quality of TikTok videos on coronary artery disease using various scales to examine correlations with video characteristics and high-quality content.使用各种量表评估TikTok上关于冠状动脉疾病的视频质量,以检验与视频特征和高质量内容的相关性。
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 17;15(1):9189. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-93986-3.
9
YouTube/ Bilibili/ TikTok videos as sources of medical information on laryngeal carcinoma: cross-sectional content analysis study.YouTube/ Bilibili/ TikTok 视频作为喉癌医学信息来源:横断面内容分析研究。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jun 14;24(1):1594. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19077-6.
10
Quality of information in gestational diabetes mellitus videos on TikTok: Cross-sectional study.TikTok上妊娠糖尿病视频的信息质量:横断面研究
PLoS One. 2025 Feb 6;20(2):e0316242. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0316242. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Quality assessment of health science-related short videos on TikTok: A scoping review.标题:评估 TikTok 上与健康科学相关的短视频质量:范围综述
Int J Med Inform. 2024 Jun;186:105426. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2024.105426. Epub 2024 Mar 22.
2
TikTok content as a source of health education regarding epicondylitis: a content analysis.TikTok 内容作为网球肘健康教育的来源:内容分析。
J Orthop Traumatol. 2024 Mar 23;25(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s10195-024-00757-3.
3
Text-Mining and Video Analytics of COVID-19 Narratives Shared by Patients on YouTube.
文本挖掘和视频分析 COVID-19 患者在 YouTube 上分享的叙事。
J Med Syst. 2024 Feb 15;48(1):21. doi: 10.1007/s10916-024-02047-1.
4
Assessment of the reliability and quality of breast cancer related videos on TikTok and Bilibili: cross-sectional study in China.TikTok和哔哩哔哩上乳腺癌相关视频的可靠性和质量评估:中国的横断面研究
Front Public Health. 2024 Jan 22;11:1296386. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1296386. eCollection 2023.
5
Quality of Spine Surgery Information on Social Media: A DISCERN Analysis of TikTok Videos.社交媒体上脊柱手术信息的质量:对TikTok视频的DISCERN分析
Neurospine. 2023 Dec;20(4):1443-1449. doi: 10.14245/ns.2346700.350. Epub 2023 Dec 31.
6
TikTok video as a health education source of information on heart failure in China: a content analysis.TikTok 视频作为中国心力衰竭健康教育信息来源:内容分析。
Front Public Health. 2023 Dec 11;11:1315393. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1315393. eCollection 2023.
7
Information quality of videos related to Helicobacter pylori infection on TikTok: Cross-sectional study.关于 TikTok 上幽门螺杆菌感染相关视频的信息质量:横断面研究。
Helicobacter. 2024 Jan-Feb;29(1):e13029. doi: 10.1111/hel.13029. Epub 2023 Oct 12.
8
Promoting Activity, Independence, and Stability in Early Dementia and mild cognitive impairment (PrAISED): randomised controlled trial.促进早期痴呆和轻度认知障碍患者的活动、独立和稳定(PrAISED):随机对照试验。
BMJ. 2023 Aug 29;382:e074787. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2023-074787.
9
TikTok and Bilibili as sources of information on Helicobacter pylori in China: A content and quality analysis.中国的TikTok和哔哩哔哩作为幽门螺杆菌信息来源:内容与质量分析
Helicobacter. 2023 Oct;28(5):e13007. doi: 10.1111/hel.13007. Epub 2023 Jul 15.
10
Quality and Reliability of Liver Cancer-Related Short Chinese Videos on TikTok and Bilibili: Cross-Sectional Content Analysis Study.肝癌相关短视频在 TikTok 和 Bilibili 上的质量与可靠性:一项横断面内容分析研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jul 5;25:e47210. doi: 10.2196/47210.