Institute for Ethics, History, and the Humanities (iEH2), Centre médical universitaire, University of Geneva, 1 rue Michel Servet, CH-1211 Geneva 4, Switzerland.
Med Hist. 2023 Oct;67(4):307-323. doi: 10.1017/mdh.2023.29. Epub 2023 Oct 13.
During the interwar period, France put unprecedented efforts into public health measures targeting the colonised populations of sub-Saharan Africa. This investment in health was seen as crucial to ensuring the renewal of the African labour force needed for the economic development of the colonies. Syphilis, although less deadly than other endemic or epidemic diseases such as yellow fever, sleeping sickness and bubonic plague, was one of the most widespread infections in France's sub-Saharan colonies. This article demonstrates the contradictory nature of the colonial medicine approach to this disease during the interwar years. The negative impact of syphilis on population growth in Africa made it a major threat to the colonial project, and France put significant, costly investment into tackling the disease, focusing its efforts on maternal and child health. However, a closer look at syphilis control in sub-Saharan Africa reveals that the disease was also minimised as a public health issue, under-resourced and downplayed by colonial doctors and administrators. This neglect was embodied in the invention of a new colonial disease, 'exotic syphilis', which was presented as being a relatively benign skin disease among the African populations. It was also reflected in care practices, via a form of mass medicine based on the use of , which consisted of knowingly limiting treatment to a superficial effect.
在两次世界大战期间,法国投入了前所未有的努力,针对撒哈拉以南非洲的殖民地人口实施公共卫生措施。这种对健康的投资被视为确保殖民地经济发展所需的非洲劳动力更新的关键。梅毒虽然不如黄热病、昏睡病和鼠疫等其他地方性或流行性疾病致命,但在法国的撒哈拉以南殖民地是最广泛传播的感染之一。本文展示了两次世界大战期间殖民医学对这种疾病的矛盾态度。梅毒对非洲人口增长的负面影响使其成为殖民项目的主要威胁,法国投入了大量的资金和成本来解决这一疾病,将重点放在母婴健康上。然而,仔细研究撒哈拉以南非洲的梅毒控制情况,就会发现这种疾病也被殖民医生和管理人员最小化地视为公共卫生问题,资源不足且被淡化。这种忽视体现在发明了一种新的殖民疾病“外来梅毒”,这种疾病在非洲人群中被认为是一种相对良性的皮肤病。它也反映在护理实践中,采用了一种基于使用的大众医学形式,这种形式故意将治疗限制在表面效果上。