• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中文版特质自然感恩量表的心理测量学特性

Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Trait Gratitude to Nature Scale.

作者信息

Li Xiaoyu, Liang Hongyu, Jin Tonglin, Zhang Jing, A Yunna, Hu Mulan, Wang Yifan

机构信息

School of Psychology, Inner Mongolia Normal University, Hohhot, China.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2023 Sep 27;14:1231962. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1231962. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1231962
PMID:37829063
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10565491/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Trait Gratitude to Nature Scale (TGNS) for Chinese college students.

METHODS

The original English version of the TGNS was translated into Chinese. Subsequently, two samples consisting of 1,131 Chinese university students from Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region was recruited through online surveys to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the TGNS, including the discrimination, construct validity, criterion validity, reliability and gender invariance.

RESULTS

The Chinese version of the TGNS showed good psychometric properties. The item-total correlation coefficients of the scale ranged from 0.813 to 0.909. Exploratory factor analysis using data from Sample 1 ( = 617) demonstrated that the Chinese version of the TGNS has one factor. The confirmatory factor analysis using data from Sample 2 ( = 514) showed that the Chinese version of the TGNS has appropriate construct validity (χ = 4.157, RMSEA = 0.078, TLI = 0.943 and CFI = 0.967). The significant correlation between the Chinese version of the TGNS and all the other criterion scale scores ( < 0.001) indicated that the Chinese version of the TGNS displays good criterion validity. The test-retest reliability was 0.914, using the sub-sample of Sample 2 ( = 127). The results of gender invariance test indicated that the Chinese version of the TGNS has entire equivalence between the two genders.

CONCLUSION

The Chinese version of the TGNS has satisfactory psychometric properties in the Chinese cultural context and can be used as s a reliable and valid instrument to assess trait gratitude to nature.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估中文版特质自然感恩量表(TGNS)在中国大学生中的信效度。

方法

将TGNS的原始英文版翻译成中文。随后,通过在线调查招募了来自内蒙古自治区的1131名中国大学生组成的两个样本,以评估中文版TGNS的心理测量学特性,包括区分度、结构效度、效标效度、信度和性别不变性。

结果

中文版TGNS显示出良好的心理测量学特性。该量表的项目-总分相关系数在0.813至0.909之间。使用样本1(n = 617)的数据进行探索性因素分析表明,中文版TGNS有一个因素。使用样本2(n = 514)的数据进行验证性因素分析表明,中文版TGNS具有适当的结构效度(χ = 4.157,RMSEA = 0.078,TLI = 0.943,CFI = 0.967)。中文版TGNS与所有其他效标量表分数之间的显著相关性(p < 0.001)表明,中文版TGNS具有良好的效标效度。使用样本2的子样本(n = 127)进行重测信度为0.914。性别不变性测试结果表明,中文版TGNS在两种性别之间具有完全等效性。

结论

中文版TGNS在中文文化背景下具有令人满意的心理测量学特性,可作为评估特质自然感恩的可靠有效工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80db/10565491/0374e1a0d2ac/fpsyg-14-1231962-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80db/10565491/76904cff63ac/fpsyg-14-1231962-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80db/10565491/4420c4b09b6b/fpsyg-14-1231962-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80db/10565491/0374e1a0d2ac/fpsyg-14-1231962-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80db/10565491/76904cff63ac/fpsyg-14-1231962-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80db/10565491/4420c4b09b6b/fpsyg-14-1231962-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80db/10565491/0374e1a0d2ac/fpsyg-14-1231962-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Trait Gratitude to Nature Scale.中文版特质自然感恩量表的心理测量学特性
Front Psychol. 2023 Sep 27;14:1231962. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1231962. eCollection 2023.
2
Psychometric properties of the effort-reward imbalance scale in Chinese version for university students.中文版努力-回报失衡量表在大学生群体中的心理测量学特性
Front Psychol. 2023 Feb 1;14:1128290. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1128290. eCollection 2023.
3
Social Media Disorder, Mental Health, and Validation of the Chinese Version of 27-Item Social Media Disorder Scale in Chinese College Students.社交媒体障碍、心理健康与中文版 27 项社交媒体障碍量表在中国大学生中的验证。
Front Public Health. 2022 Jul 5;10:942720. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.942720. eCollection 2022.
4
Translation and psychometric evaluation of Smartphone Addiction Scale-Short Version (SAS-SV) among Chinese college students.中文大学生智能手机成瘾量表短版(SAS-SV)的翻译与心理计量学评估。
PLoS One. 2022 Nov 29;17(11):e0278092. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278092. eCollection 2022.
5
The Chinese version of the Perceived Stress Questionnaire: development and validation amongst medical students and workers.中文版的感知压力问卷:医学生和医务人员的编制与验证。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Mar 13;18(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01307-1.
6
Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the achievement emotions questionnaire for physical education in university students.大学生体育成就情绪问卷中文版的信度和效度。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Sep 21;23(1):1839. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16759-5.
7
Measuring self-as-context in Chinese college students: Validity and reliability of the Chinese version of self-as-context scale (C-SACS).测量中国大学生的自我即情境:中文版自我即情境量表(C-SACS)的效度和信度
Front Psychol. 2022 Dec 6;13:1051661. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1051661. eCollection 2022.
8
The trait-state fear of missing out scale: Validity, reliability, and measurement invariance in a Chinese sample of university students.特质-状态错失恐惧量表在中国大学生样本中的效度、信度和测量不变性。
J Affect Disord. 2020 Sep 1;274:711-718. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.05.103. Epub 2020 May 24.
9
Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the Academic Resilience Scale-30 (C-ARS-30) in college students.大学生中文版学术复原力量表30(C-ARS-30)的心理测量学评估
Front Psychol. 2024 Aug 7;15:1276618. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1276618. eCollection 2024.
10
Validation and structural exploration of the Chinese version of the Body Talk Scale.《身体倾诉量表》中文版的效度验证与结构探索
Body Image. 2024 Dec;51:101766. doi: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2024.101766. Epub 2024 Jul 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Reliability and validity of the revised indebtedness scale in Chinese university students.修订后的中国大学生债务量表的信效度
Sci Rep. 2024 Dec 30;14(1):31788. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-82662-7.
2
Is matching or discrepancy between filial piety expectation and filial support better? The role of filial support of children and social support.代际期待与代际支持相匹配或不匹配更好?子女支持和社会支持的作用。
Psych J. 2024 Oct;13(5):738-748. doi: 10.1002/pchj.752. Epub 2024 Apr 15.

本文引用的文献

1
Psychometric properties of the job anxiety scale.工作焦虑量表的心理测量学特性。
Front Psychol. 2023 Apr 25;14:1020596. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1020596. eCollection 2023.
2
The Elemental Psychopathy Assessment (EPA): Factor structure and construct validity across three German samples.元素性精神病态评估 (EPA):三个德国样本的因子结构和构念效度。
Psychol Assess. 2022 Aug;34(8):717-730. doi: 10.1037/pas0001126. Epub 2022 Mar 28.
3
Effect of Materialism on Pro-environmental Behavior Among Youth in China: The Role of Nature Connectedness.
物质主义对中国青少年环保行为的影响:自然联结的作用。
Front Psychol. 2022 Feb 22;13:794816. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.794816. eCollection 2022.
4
Environmental Value and Pro-environmental Behavior Among Young Adults: The Mediating Role of Risk Perception and Moral Anger.年轻人的环境价值观与亲环境行为:风险认知与道德愤怒的中介作用
Front Psychol. 2022 Feb 9;13:771421. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.771421. eCollection 2022.
5
Psychometric Properties of the Chinese Version of the Brief-Mindful Self-Care Scale: A Translation and Validation Study.中文版简易正念自我关怀量表的心理测量学特性:一项翻译与验证研究。
Front Psychol. 2021 Aug 13;12:715507. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.715507. eCollection 2021.
6
The Poor Fit of Model Fit for Selecting Number of Factors in Exploratory Factor Analysis for Scale Evaluation.量表评估探索性因素分析中用于选择因素数量的模型拟合不佳。
Educ Psychol Meas. 2021 Jun;81(3):413-440. doi: 10.1177/0013164420942899. Epub 2020 Aug 12.
7
Awe/Gratitude as an Experiential Aspect of Spirituality and Its Association to Perceived Positive Changes During the COVID-19 Pandemic.敬畏/感恩作为灵性的一种体验层面及其与 COVID-19 大流行期间感知到的积极变化的关联
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Apr 20;12:642716. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.642716. eCollection 2021.
8
Can positive and self-transcendent emotions promote pro-environmental behavior?积极情绪和自我超越情绪能否促进环保行为?
Curr Opin Psychol. 2021 Dec;42:31-35. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.02.009. Epub 2021 Mar 4.
9
Gratitude reduces consumption of depleting resources.感恩之心可减少资源消耗。
Emotion. 2021 Aug;21(5):1119-1123. doi: 10.1037/emo0000936. Epub 2020 Dec 28.
10
Perceiving gratitude from a romantic partner predicts decreases in attachment anxiety.感知到来自浪漫伴侣的感激之情可以预测依恋焦虑的减少。
Dev Psychol. 2019 Dec;55(12):2692-2700. doi: 10.1037/dev0000830. Epub 2019 Sep 12.