作者行为规范必须与时俱进，以支持合作和开放科学。
Authorship practices must evolve to support collaboration and open science.
机构信息
Public Library of Science, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
出版信息
PLoS Biol. 2023 Oct 13;21(10):e3002364. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3002364. eCollection 2023 Oct.
Abstract
Journal authorship practices have not sufficiently evolved to reflect the way research is now done. Improvements to support teams, collaboration, and open science are urgently needed.
摘要
期刊作者的工作方式尚未充分发展，以反映现在的研究方式。迫切需要改进对支持团队、合作和开放科学的支持。
相似文献
1
Authorship practices must evolve to support collaboration and open science.作者行为规范必须与时俱进，以支持合作和开放科学。
PLoS Biol. 2023 Oct 13;21(10):e3002364. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3002364. eCollection 2023 Oct.
2
Assessing Research Collaboration through Co-authorship Network Analysis.通过合著网络分析评估研究合作
J Res Adm. 2018 Spring;49(1):76-99.
3
Honorary Authorship Practices in Environmental Science Teams: Structural and Cultural Factors and Solutions.环境科学团队中的荣誉作者行为：结构、文化因素及解决方案
Account Res. 2017;24(2):80-98. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2016.1251320. Epub 2016 Oct 24.
4
Authorship and sampling practice in selected biomechanics and sports science journals.选定的生物力学和运动科学期刊中的作者身份和抽样实践。
Percept Mot Skills. 2011 Jun;112(3):838-44. doi: 10.2466/17.PMS.112.3.838-844.
5
Knowledge and Awareness of Authorship Practices Among Health Science Students: A Cross-Sectional Study.健康科学专业学生对作者身份实践的认知与了解：一项横断面研究。
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2021 Apr 20;12:383-392. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S298645. eCollection 2021.
6
Gender-heterogeneous working groups produce higher quality science.性别多元化的工作团队能产出质量更高的科研成果。
PLoS One. 2013 Oct 30;8(10):e79147. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0079147. eCollection 2013.
7
A study on scientific collaboration and co-authorship patterns in library and information science studies in Iran between 2005 and 2009.一项关于2005年至2009年间伊朗图书馆与信息科学研究中的科学合作与共同署名模式的研究。
J Educ Health Promot. 2014 Aug 28;3:99. doi: 10.4103/2277-9531.139681. eCollection 2014.
8
Researchers' Perceptions of Ethical Authorship Distribution in Collaborative Research Teams.研究人员对合作研究团队中伦理作者署名分配的看法。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2020 Aug;26(4):1995-2022. doi: 10.1007/s11948-019-00113-3. Epub 2019 Jun 4.
9
Health policy and systems research collaboration pathways: lessons from a network science analysis.卫生政策与系统研究合作路径：网络科学分析的经验教训
Health Res Policy Syst. 2017 Aug 28;15(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s12961-017-0241-5.
10
Co-authorship network analysis in health research: method and potential use.健康研究中的共同作者网络分析：方法与潜在用途。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2016 Apr 30;14(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s12961-016-0104-5.
引用本文的文献
1
GetGenome: Overcoming inequalities in access to genomics technology.获取基因组：克服获取基因组技术方面的不平等。
PLoS Biol. 2024 Aug 26;22(8):e3002804. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3002804. eCollection 2024 Aug.
2
PLOS Biology at 20: Exploring possible futures.PLOS 生物学 20 周年：探索可能的未来。
PLoS Biol. 2023 Oct 19;21(10):e3002377. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3002377. eCollection 2023 Oct.
本文引用的文献
1
Genomic surveillance uncovers a pandemic clonal lineage of the wheat blast fungus.基因组监测揭示了小麦赤霉病菌的一个流行克隆谱系。
PLoS Biol. 2023 Apr 11;21(4):e3002052. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3002052. eCollection 2023 Apr.
2
Method Reporting with Initials for Transparency (MeRIT) promotes more granularity and accountability for author contributions.方法报告首字母缩略词透明化（MeRIT）促进了作者贡献的更细化和问责制。
Nat Commun. 2023 Apr 3;14(1):1788. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-37039-1.
3
Who did what: changing how science papers are written to detail author contributions.谁做了什么：改变科学论文的撰写方式以详细说明作者贡献。
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2023 Aug;24(8):519-520. doi: 10.1038/s41580-023-00587-x.
4
Recognizing the value of software: a software citation guide.认识软件的价值：软件引文指南。
F1000Res. 2020 Oct 19;9:1257. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.26932.2. eCollection 2020.
5
A data citation roadmap for scientific publishers.科学出版商的数据引用路线图。
Sci Data. 2018 Nov 20;5:180259. doi: 10.1038/sdata.2018.259.
6
Transparency in authors' contributions and responsibilities to promote integrity in scientific publication.透明度在作者的贡献和责任，以促进科学出版的诚信。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Mar 13;115(11):2557-2560. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1715374115. Epub 2018 Feb 27.
7
Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics.文献计量学：《莱顿研究指标宣言》
Nature. 2015 Apr 23;520(7548):429-31. doi: 10.1038/520429a.
8
A systematic review of research on the meaning, ethics and practices of authorship across scholarly disciplines.一项系统综述，对各学术领域中关于作者身份的意义、伦理和实践的研究进行了综述。
PLoS One. 2011;6(9):e23477. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0023477. Epub 2011 Sep 8.
9
Harmonic allocation of authorship credit: source-level correction of bibliometric bias assures accurate publication and citation analysis.作者署名信用的谐波分配：文献计量偏差的源级别校正可确保准确的发表和引文分析。
PLoS One. 2008;3(12):e4021. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0004021. Epub 2008 Dec 24.
Zotero 插件