Suppr超能文献

透明度在作者的贡献和责任,以促进科学出版的诚信。

Transparency in authors' contributions and responsibilities to promote integrity in scientific publication.

机构信息

National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC 20001;

Science Journals, American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington, DC 20005.

出版信息

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Mar 13;115(11):2557-2560. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1715374115. Epub 2018 Feb 27.

Abstract

In keeping with the growing movement in scientific publishing toward transparency in data and methods, we propose changes to journal authorship policies and procedures to provide insight into which author is responsible for which contributions, better assurance that the list is complete, and clearly articulated standards to justify earning authorship credit. To accomplish these goals, we recommend that journals adopt common and transparent standards for authorship, outline responsibilities for corresponding authors, adopt the Contributor Roles Taxonomy (CRediT) (docs.casrai.org/CRediT) methodology for attributing contributions, include this information in article metadata, and require authors to use the ORCID persistent digital identifier (https://orcid.org). Additionally, we recommend that universities and research institutions articulate expectations about author roles and responsibilities to provide a point of common understanding for discussion of authorship across research teams. Furthermore, we propose that funding agencies adopt the ORCID identifier and accept the CRediT taxonomy. We encourage scientific societies to further authorship transparency by signing on to these recommendations and promoting them through their meetings and publications programs.

摘要

为了顺应科学出版界在数据和方法方面日益增强的透明度趋势,我们提议对期刊作者政策和程序进行修改,以深入了解哪位作者负责哪些贡献,更好地确保列表完整,并明确阐明获得作者身份的标准。为了实现这些目标,我们建议期刊采用通用和透明的作者标准,概述相应作者的责任,采用贡献归因的 Contributor Roles Taxonomy (CRediT)(docs.casrai.org/CRediT)方法,将此信息包含在文章元数据中,并要求作者使用 ORCID 持久数字标识符(https://orcid.org)。此外,我们建议大学和研究机构阐明对作者角色和责任的期望,为跨研究团队讨论作者身份提供共识点。此外,我们提议资助机构采用 ORCID 标识符并接受 CRediT 分类法。我们鼓励科学学会通过签署这些建议并通过其会议和出版计划来进一步提高作者身份的透明度。

相似文献

1
Transparency in authors' contributions and responsibilities to promote integrity in scientific publication.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Mar 13;115(11):2557-2560. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1715374115. Epub 2018 Feb 27.
2
Clarifying middle authorship contributions to reduce abuses in science publishing and assessment of top-ranked SJR biochemistry and pharmacology journals' authorship criteria.
Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2024 Dec;397(12):10215-10221. doi: 10.1007/s00210-024-03277-3. Epub 2024 Jul 10.
3
Author contributions to ecological publications: What does it mean to be an author in modern ecological research?
PLoS One. 2017 Jun 26;12(6):e0179956. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179956. eCollection 2017.
4
Authorship in scientific publications: analysis and recommendations.
Swiss Med Wkly. 2015 Feb 21;145:w14108. doi: 10.4414/smw.2015.14108. eCollection 2015.
6
Managing the "Three Cs" of Academic Literature Authorship: Contributions, Credit, and Conflict.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2023 May;87(5):100009. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpe.2022.10.002. Epub 2023 Mar 15.
7
Credit where credit is due? Regulation, research integrity and the attribution of authorship in the health sciences.
Soc Sci Med. 2010 May;70(9):1458-65. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.01.013. Epub 2010 Feb 12.
8
Best Practice to Order Authors in Multi/Interdisciplinary Health Sciences Research Publications.
Account Res. 2017;24(4):243-267. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2017.1287567. Epub 2017 Jan 27.

引用本文的文献

3
Reliability of meta-analyses in ecology and evolution: (mostly) good news from a case study on sexual signals.
Proc Biol Sci. 2025 May;292(2047):20242782. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2024.2782. Epub 2025 May 21.
5
Artificial intelligence-assisted academic writing: recommendations for ethical use.
Adv Simul (Lond). 2025 Apr 18;10(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s41077-025-00350-6.
6
What are the ethical limits of claimed scientific authorship? a case report of relevance.
Cell Mol Life Sci. 2025 Mar 17;82(1):120. doi: 10.1007/s00018-025-05650-8.
7
Vulnerability of amphibians to global warming.
Nature. 2025 Mar;639(8056):954-961. doi: 10.1038/s41586-025-08665-0. Epub 2025 Mar 5.
9
Identifying fabricated networks within authorship-for-sale enterprises.
Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 28;14(1):29569. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-71230-8.
10
Virulome and phylogenomic profiling of a novel Burkholderia pseudomallei strain from an Indian clinical isolate.
Mol Genet Genomics. 2024 Oct 23;299(1):98. doi: 10.1007/s00438-024-02188-5.

本文引用的文献

1
Authorship and contribution disclosures.
Sci Adv. 2017 Nov 8;3(11):e1700404. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1700404. eCollection 2017 Nov.
2
A distinct role for Lgr5 stem cells in primary and metastatic colon cancer.
Nature. 2017 Mar 29;543(7647):676-680. doi: 10.1038/nature21713.
4
Honorary authorship in biomedical journals: how common is it and why does it exist?
J Med Ethics. 2014 May;40(5):346-8. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2012-101311. Epub 2013 Aug 17.
6
Second thoughts on who goes where in author lists.
Nature. 2006 Jul 6;442(7098):26. doi: 10.1038/442026d.
8
Authorship! Authorship! Guests, ghosts, grafters, and the two-sided coin.
JAMA. 1994 Feb 9;271(6):469-71. doi: 10.1001/jama.271.6.469.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验