• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

方法报告首字母缩略词透明化（MeRIT）促进了作者贡献的更细化和问责制。

Method Reporting with Initials for Transparency (MeRIT) promotes more granularity and accountability for author contributions.

机构信息

Evolution & Ecology Research Centre and School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, UNSW, Sydney, Australia.

School of Biodiversity, One Health and Veterinary Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.

出版信息

Nat Commun. 2023 Apr 3;14(1):1788. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-37039-1.

DOI:10.1038/s41467-023-37039-1
PMID:37012240
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10070262/
Abstract

Contributor Roles Taxonomy (CRediT) has recently changed how author contributions are acknowledged. To extend and complement CRediT, we propose MeRIT, a new way of writing the Methods section using the author’s initials to further clarify contributor roles for reproducibility and replicability.

摘要

贡献者角色分类法（CRediT）最近改变了作者贡献的认可方式。为了扩展和补充 CRediT，我们提出了 MeRIT，这是一种使用作者首字母来进一步阐明方法部分的作者贡献以提高可重复性和可复制性的新方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ac9/10070262/05095f73b315/41467_2023_37039_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ac9/10070262/6508fffd8f69/41467_2023_37039_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ac9/10070262/05095f73b315/41467_2023_37039_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ac9/10070262/6508fffd8f69/41467_2023_37039_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ac9/10070262/05095f73b315/41467_2023_37039_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Method Reporting with Initials for Transparency (MeRIT) promotes more granularity and accountability for author contributions.方法报告首字母缩略词透明化（MeRIT）促进了作者贡献的更细化和问责制。
Nat Commun. 2023 Apr 3;14(1):1788. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-37039-1.
2
Ahead of others in the authorship order: names with middle initials appear earlier in author lists of academic articles in psychology.在作者排序中排在他人之前：带有中间名首字母的名字在心理学学术文章的作者名单中出现得更早。
Front Psychol. 2015 Apr 21;6:469. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00469. eCollection 2015.
3
The Core Roles of Transparency and Accountability in the Governance of Global Health Public-Private Partnerships.透明度和问责制在全球卫生公私伙伴关系治理中的核心作用。
Health Syst Reform. 2018;4(3):239-248. doi: 10.1080/23288604.2018.1465880. Epub 2018 Jul 19.
4
Promoting transparency, accountability, and access through a multi-stakeholder initiative: lessons from the medicines transparency alliance.通过多方利益相关者倡议促进透明度、问责制和获取：来自药品透明度联盟的经验教训。
J Pharm Policy Pract. 2017 Jun 2;10:18. doi: 10.1186/s40545-017-0106-x. eCollection 2017.
5
The meaning of author order in medical research.医学研究中作者排序的意义。
J Investig Med. 2007 May;55(4):174-80. doi: 10.2310/6650.2007.06044.
6
A Reading Model from the Perspective of Japanese Orthography: Connectionist Approach to the Hypothesis of Granularity and Transparency.从日语正字法角度看阅读模型：粒度和透明度假设的连接主义方法。
J Learn Disabil. 2018 Sep/Oct;51(5):490-498. doi: 10.1177/0022219417718200. Epub 2017 Jul 21.
7
The risk of corruption in public pharmaceutical procurement: how anti-corruption, transparency and accountability measures may reduce this risk.公共药品采购中的腐败风险：反腐败、透明度和问责措施如何降低这种风险。
Glob Health Action. 2020;13(sup1):1694745. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2019.1694745.
8
Strengthening fairness, transparency and accountability in health care priority setting at district level in Tanzania.加强坦桑尼亚地区医疗优先事项设定中的公平性、透明度和问责制。
Glob Health Action. 2011;4. doi: 10.3402/gha.v4i0.7829. Epub 2011 Nov 7.
9
Building consensus on author selection practices for industry-sponsored research: recommendations from an expert task force of medical publication professionals.建立行业资助研究的作者选择实践共识：医学出版专业人员专家工作组的建议。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2022 Jun;38(6):863-870. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2022.2050111. Epub 2022 Apr 19.
10
How to Make Pediatric Trials Better: Transparency and Accountability of Trial Registration and Reporting.如何改进儿科试验：试验注册与报告的透明度和问责制
J Pediatr. 2018 Feb;193:11-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2017.10.044. Epub 2017 Nov 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Synthesis of Nature's Extravaganza: An Augmented Meta-Meta-Analysis on (Putative) Sexual Signals.自然盛宴的合成：关于（假定的）性信号的增强型元元分析
Ecol Lett. 2025 Sep;28(9):e70215. doi: 10.1111/ele.70215.
2
Rapamycin, Not Metformin, Mirrors Dietary Restriction-Driven Lifespan Extension in Vertebrates: A Meta-Analysis.雷帕霉素而非二甲双胍，可反映饮食限制对脊椎动物寿命延长的影响：一项荟萃分析。
Aging Cell. 2025 Sep;24(9):e70131. doi: 10.1111/acel.70131. Epub 2025 Jun 18.
3
Chimeric antigen receptor NK-92 cell function is modulated by HLA class I expression of target cells.

本文引用的文献

1
Little transparency and equity in scientific awards for early- and mid-career researchers in ecology and evolution.早期和中期生态与进化领域研究人员的科学奖项缺乏透明度和公平性。
Nat Ecol Evol. 2023 May;7(5):655-665. doi: 10.1038/s41559-023-02028-6. Epub 2023 Apr 3.
2
Who did what: changing how science papers are written to detail author contributions.谁做了什么：改变科学论文的撰写方式以详细说明作者贡献。
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2023 Aug;24(8):519-520. doi: 10.1038/s41580-023-00587-x.
3
Why don't we share data and code? Perceived barriers and benefits to public archiving practices.
嵌合抗原受体NK-92细胞的功能受靶细胞HLA I类分子表达的调节。
iScience. 2025 Apr 23;28(5):112523. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2025.112523. eCollection 2025 May 16.
4
Reliability of meta-analyses in ecology and evolution: (mostly) good news from a case study on sexual signals.生态学与进化领域中荟萃分析的可靠性：来自一项关于性信号的案例研究的（大多为）好消息。
Proc Biol Sci. 2025 May;292(2047):20242782. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2024.2782. Epub 2025 May 21.
5
Evidence of the impacts of pharmaceuticals on aquatic animal behaviour (EIPAAB): a systematic map and open access database.药物对水生动物行为的影响证据（EIPAAB）：系统综述与开放获取数据库
Environ Evid. 2025 Mar 20;14(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s13750-025-00357-6.
6
Vulnerability of amphibians to global warming.两栖动物对全球变暖的脆弱性。
Nature. 2025 Mar;639(8056):954-961. doi: 10.1038/s41586-025-08665-0. Epub 2025 Mar 5.
7
Poor hypotheses and research waste in biology: learning from a theory crisis in psychology.生物学中的糟糕假设与研究浪费：从心理学的理论危机中汲取教训
BMC Biol. 2025 Feb 4;23(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s12915-025-02134-w.
8
A manifesto for a globally diverse, equitable, and inclusive open science.一份关于全球多元、公平且包容的开放科学的宣言。
Commun Psychol. 2025 Jan 29;3(1):16. doi: 10.1038/s44271-024-00179-1.
9
"When I talk about it, my eyes light up!" Impacts of a national laboratory internship on community college student success.“当我谈论起这件事时，我的眼睛都亮了！” 国家实验室实习对社区大学生成功的影响。
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 14;20(1):e0317403. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317403. eCollection 2025.
10
Title, abstract and keywords: a practical guide to maximize the visibility and impact of academic papers.标题、摘要和关键词：提高学术论文可见度和影响力的实用指南。
Proc Biol Sci. 2024 Jul;291(2027):20241222. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2024.1222. Epub 2024 Jul 31.
为什么我们不共享数据和代码？对公共存档实践的感知障碍和收益。
Proc Biol Sci. 2022 Nov 30;289(1987):20221113. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2022.1113. Epub 2022 Nov 23.
4
Build up big-team science.建立大型团队科学。
Nature. 2022 Jan;601(7894):505-507. doi: 10.1038/d41586-022-00150-2.
5
Challenges for assessing replicability in preclinical cancer biology.评估临床前癌症生物学可重复性面临的挑战。
Elife. 2021 Dec 7;10:e67995. doi: 10.7554/eLife.67995.
6
Documenting contributions to scholarly articles using CRediT and tenzing.使用 CRediT 和 tenzing 记录学术文章的贡献。
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 31;15(12):e0244611. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244611. eCollection 2020.
7
The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity.《评估研究人员的香港原则：促进研究诚信》
PLoS Biol. 2020 Jul 16;18(7):e3000737. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000737. eCollection 2020 Jul.
8
Response to letters to the editor concerning AJPA commentary on "data sharing in biological anthropology: Guiding principles and best practices".对致编辑的信的回复，这些信涉及美国体质人类学期刊（AJPA）对“生物人类学中的数据共享：指导原则和最佳实践”的评论。
Am J Phys Anthropol. 2020 Jul;172(3):344-346. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.24065. Epub 2020 Apr 30.
9
Farewell authors, hello contributors.告别作者，欢迎贡献者。
Nature. 2019 Jul;571(7764):147. doi: 10.1038/d41586-019-02084-8.
10
Occurrence and nature of questionable research practices in the reporting of messages and conclusions in international scientific Health Services Research publications: a structured assessment of publications authored by researchers in the Netherlands.国际卫生服务研究出版物中报告信息和结论的可疑研究行为的发生情况和性质：对荷兰研究人员撰写的出版物进行的结构化评估。
BMJ Open. 2019 May 15;9(5):e027903. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027903.