• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

交流观点:应对分享定性研究数据的挑战

Exchanging words: Engaging the challenges of sharing qualitative research data.

作者信息

DuBois James M, Mozersky Jessica, Parsons Meredith, Walsh Heidi A, Friedrich Annie, Pienta Amy

机构信息

Bioethics Research Center, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110.

ICPSR, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48106.

出版信息

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Oct 24;120(43):e2206981120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2206981120. Epub 2023 Oct 13.

DOI:10.1073/pnas.2206981120
PMID:37831745
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10614603/
Abstract

In January 2023, a new NIH policy on data sharing went into effect. The policy applies to both quantitative and qualitative research (QR) data such as data from interviews or focus groups. QR data are often sensitive and difficult to deidentify, and thus have rarely been shared in the United States. Over the past 5 y, our research team has engaged stakeholders on QR data sharing, developed software to support data deidentification, produced guidance, and collaborated with the ICPSR data repository to pilot the deposit of 30 QR datasets. In this perspective article, we share important lessons learned by addressing eight clusters of questions on issues such as where, when, and what to share; how to deidentify data and support high-quality secondary use; budgeting for data sharing; and the permissions needed to share data. We also offer a brief assessment of the state of preparedness of data repositories, QR journals, and QR textbooks to support data sharing. While QR data sharing could yield important benefits to the research community, we quickly need to develop enforceable standards, expertise, and resources to support responsible QR data sharing. Absent these resources, we risk violating participant confidentiality and wasting a significant amount of time and funding on data that are not useful for either secondary use or data transparency and verification.

摘要

2023年1月,美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)一项关于数据共享的新政策生效。该政策适用于定量和定性研究(QR)数据,如访谈或焦点小组的数据。QR数据通常很敏感,难以去识别化,因此在美国很少被共享。在过去5年里,我们的研究团队与利益相关者就QR数据共享进行了接触,开发了支持数据去识别化的软件,制定了指南,并与校际政治与社会研究联盟(ICPSR)数据存储库合作,试点存入了30个QR数据集。在这篇观点文章中,我们分享了通过解决八个问题组所学到的重要经验教训,这些问题组涉及诸如在哪里、何时以及分享什么;如何对数据进行去识别化并支持高质量的二次使用;数据共享的预算;以及共享数据所需的权限等问题。我们还简要评估了数据存储库、QR期刊和QR教科书在支持数据共享方面的准备情况。虽然QR数据共享可能会给研究界带来重要益处,但我们迫切需要制定可执行的标准、专业知识和资源,以支持负责任的QR数据共享。如果缺乏这些资源,我们就有可能侵犯参与者的隐私,并在对二次使用或数据透明度及验证均无用处的数据上浪费大量时间和资金。

相似文献

1
Exchanging words: Engaging the challenges of sharing qualitative research data.交流观点:应对分享定性研究数据的挑战
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Oct 24;120(43):e2206981120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2206981120. Epub 2023 Oct 13.
2
Are we ready to share qualitative research data? Knowledge and preparedness among qualitative researchers, IRB Members, and data repository curators.我们准备好分享定性研究数据了吗?定性研究人员、机构审查委员会成员和数据存储库管理员的知识与准备情况。
IASSIST Q. 2020 Jan 8;43(4). doi: 10.29173/iq952.
3
Barriers and facilitators to qualitative data sharing in the United States: A survey of qualitative researchers.美国定性数据共享的障碍和促进因素:定性研究人员的调查。
PLoS One. 2021 Dec 31;16(12):e0261719. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261719. eCollection 2021.
4
The project data sphere initiative: accelerating cancer research by sharing data.项目数据领域计划:通过数据共享加速癌症研究
Oncologist. 2015 May;20(5):464-e20. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2014-0431. Epub 2015 Apr 15.
5
Factors influencing effective data sharing between health care and social care regarding the care of older people: a qualitative evidence synthesis.影响医疗保健和社会保健之间老年人护理方面有效数据共享的因素:定性证据综合分析。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 May;12(12):1-87. doi: 10.3310/TTWG4738.
6
Enabling qualitative research data sharing using a natural language processing pipeline for deidentification: moving beyond HIPAA Safe Harbor identifiers.使用自然语言处理管道进行去识别以实现定性研究数据共享:超越《健康保险流通与责任法案》安全港标识符。
JAMIA Open. 2021 Aug 23;4(3):ooab069. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooab069. eCollection 2021 Jul.
7
Data sharing in the context of community-engaged research partnerships.社区参与式研究伙伴关系中的数据共享。
Soc Sci Med. 2023 May;325:115895. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.115895. Epub 2023 Apr 11.
8
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
9
Security and privacy requirements for a multi-institutional cancer research data grid: an interview-based study.多机构癌症研究数据网格的安全与隐私要求:一项基于访谈的研究
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2009 Jun 15;9:31. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-9-31.
10
Qualitative Data Sharing: Data Repositories and Academic Libraries as Key Partners in Addressing Challenges.定性数据共享:数据存储库和学术图书馆作为应对挑战的关键合作伙伴
Am Behav Sci. 2019 May;63(5):643-664. Epub 2018 Jun 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Developing a Data Note reporting guideline for qualitative health and social care research datasets (the DeNOTE study): A study protocol.制定定性健康与社会护理研究数据集的数据记录报告指南(DeNOTE研究):一项研究方案。
Health Psychol Behav Med. 2025 Jul 21;13(1):2532792. doi: 10.1080/21642850.2025.2532792. eCollection 2025.
2
Talk of Family: How Institutional Overlap Shapes Family-Related Discourse Across Social Class.家庭话题:制度重叠如何塑造不同社会阶层中与家庭相关的话语
RSF. 2024 Sep;10(5):165-187. doi: 10.7758/rsf.2024.10.5.07.
3
Mixed Methods Studies Using Secondary Analysis in Nursing and Midwifery: A Methodological Review.护理与助产领域中运用二次分析的混合方法研究:方法学综述
J Adv Nurs. 2025 May;81(5):2316-2332. doi: 10.1111/jan.16557. Epub 2024 Nov 18.
4
The refined Pathways to Cures Research Roadmap for multiple sclerosis cures.多发性硬化症治愈的精细化途径研究路线图。
Mult Scler. 2024 Sep;30(10):1242-1251. doi: 10.1177/13524585241266483. Epub 2024 Aug 30.
5
Lessons Learned Establishing the Palliative Care Research Cooperative's Qualitative Data Repository.建立姑息治疗研究合作组织定性数据存储库的经验教训
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2024 Sep;68(3):308-318. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2024.05.027. Epub 2024 May 31.

本文引用的文献

1
A Content Analysis of 100 Qualitative Health Research Articles to Examine Researcher-Participant Relationships and Implications for Data Sharing.对100篇定性健康研究文章进行内容分析,以审视研究者与参与者的关系及对数据共享的启示。
Int J Qual Methods. 2022 Jan-Dec;21. doi: 10.1177/16094069221105074. Epub 2022 May 31.
2
Sharing Begins at Home: How Continuous and Ubiquitous FAIRness Can Enhance Research Productivity and Data Reuse.共享始于家庭:持续且无处不在的FAIR性如何提高研究生产力和数据复用率。
Harv Data Sci Rev. 2022 Summer;4(3). doi: 10.1162/99608f92.44d21b86. Epub 2022 Jul 28.
3
Barriers and facilitators to qualitative data sharing in the United States: A survey of qualitative researchers.美国定性数据共享的障碍和促进因素:定性研究人员的调查。
PLoS One. 2021 Dec 31;16(12):e0261719. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261719. eCollection 2021.
4
Qualitative Data Sharing: Participant Understanding, Motivation, and Consent.定性数据共享:参与者的理解、动机和同意。
Qual Health Res. 2022 Jan;32(1):182-191. doi: 10.1177/10497323211054058. Epub 2021 Dec 1.
5
Enabling qualitative research data sharing using a natural language processing pipeline for deidentification: moving beyond HIPAA Safe Harbor identifiers.使用自然语言处理管道进行去识别以实现定性研究数据共享:超越《健康保险流通与责任法案》安全港标识符。
JAMIA Open. 2021 Aug 23;4(3):ooab069. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooab069. eCollection 2021 Jul.
6
Research Participant Views regarding Qualitative Data Sharing.研究参与者对定性数据共享的看法。
Ethics Hum Res. 2020 Mar;42(2):13-27. doi: 10.1002/eahr.500044.
7
Journal data policies: Exploring how the understanding of editors and authors corresponds to the policies themselves.期刊数据政策:探究编辑和作者的理解如何与政策本身相对应。
PLoS One. 2020 Mar 25;15(3):e0230281. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230281. eCollection 2020.
8
Are we ready to share qualitative research data? Knowledge and preparedness among qualitative researchers, IRB Members, and data repository curators.我们准备好分享定性研究数据了吗?定性研究人员、机构审查委员会成员和数据存储库管理员的知识与准备情况。
IASSIST Q. 2020 Jan 8;43(4). doi: 10.29173/iq952.
9
Qualitative Data Sharing: Data Repositories and Academic Libraries as Key Partners in Addressing Challenges.定性数据共享:数据存储库和学术图书馆作为应对挑战的关键合作伙伴
Am Behav Sci. 2019 May;63(5):643-664. Epub 2018 Jun 28.
10
Ethical principles for promoting health research data sharing with sub-Saharan Africa.促进与撒哈拉以南非洲健康研究数据共享的伦理原则。
Dev World Bioeth. 2020 Jun;20(2):86-95. doi: 10.1111/dewb.12233. Epub 2019 May 21.