Private Practice, Mechanicsburg, PA.
Private Practice, Metairie, LA; Clinical Professor, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, LSU School of Dentistry, New Orleans, LA.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2024 Jan;82(1):65-72. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2023.09.011. Epub 2023 Sep 21.
The purpose of this article is to provide clinicians with options to restore the adult patient with an impacted maxillary canine using dental implants. Literature was reviewed to provide evidence for the methods suggested.
The search strategy utilized pubmed.gov to identify articles pertinent to identified treatment options. The search used terms which included dental implants and impacted tooth, tilted implants and fixed partial prostheses, 6 mm dental implants, and 4 mm dental implants. Articles were included if they reported dental implant procedures associated with impacted canines in adults, or if they reported on the use of tilted implants, immediate implant placement at time of canine removal, or the use of short implants. Articles with less than 12 months follow up were excluded.
The search identified articles which included dental implants and impacted tooth (n = 142), tilted implants and fixed partial (n = 36), 6 mm dental implants (n = 182), and 4 mm dental implants (n = 162). From this search, 28 articles were collated that satisfied the inclusion criteria. The use of tilted implants had success rates ranging from 93% to 99%. Short implants had success rates ranging from 87 to 90% in the posterior maxilla. Immediate implant placement after removal of the impacted canine lacked long term reports. Two cases are included to demonstrate treatment planning using navigation to guide implant placement in an adult patient with an impacted maxillary canine.
The evidence-based literature concerning implant placement associated with adult maxillary canines is limited. There is evidence to support tilting implants to avoid the impacted canine, or the use of short implants splinted together to avoid the impacted tooth. Other options had insufficient data to offer support.
本文旨在为临床医生提供使用牙种植体修复上颌埋伏尖牙的成年患者的选择。通过回顾文献,为所建议的方法提供证据。
本研究利用 pubmed.gov 搜索策略,确定与所提出的治疗方案相关的文章。搜索使用的术语包括牙种植体和埋伏牙、倾斜种植体和固定局部义齿、6mm 牙种植体和 4mm 牙种植体。如果文章报告了与成人埋伏尖牙相关的牙种植体程序,或者报告了倾斜种植体、埋伏尖牙去除时即刻种植体放置或使用短种植体的情况,则纳入研究。随访时间少于 12 个月的文章被排除。
搜索结果确定了 142 篇涉及牙种植体和埋伏牙的文章、36 篇涉及倾斜种植体和固定局部义齿的文章、182 篇涉及 6mm 牙种植体的文章和 162 篇涉及 4mm 牙种植体的文章。从这项搜索中,共收集了 28 篇符合纳入标准的文章。倾斜种植体的成功率在 93%到 99%之间。在上颌后牙区,短种植体的成功率在 87%至 90%之间。在埋伏尖牙去除后立即植入种植体的长期报告缺乏。有两个病例用于演示在一位患有上颌埋伏尖牙的成年患者中使用导航来指导种植体放置的治疗计划。
关于与成人上颌尖牙相关的种植体放置的循证文献有限。有证据支持倾斜种植体以避免埋伏尖牙,或使用短种植体桥接以避免埋伏牙。其他选择的数据不足,无法提供支持。