• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

健康税的构建:从中低收入国家中学习。

Framing health taxes: learning from low- and middle-income countries.

机构信息

Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research, Geneva, Switzerland.

Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA

出版信息

BMJ Glob Health. 2023 Oct;8(Suppl 8). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-012955.

DOI:10.1136/bmjgh-2023-012955
PMID:37832966
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10583086/
Abstract

Health taxes are effective policy instruments to save lives, raise government revenues and improve equity. Health taxes, however, directly conflict with commercial actors' interests. Both pro-tax health advocates and anti-tax industry representatives seek to frame health tax policy. Yet, little is known about which frames resonate in which settings and how framing can most effectively advance or limit policies. To fill this gap, we conducted qualitative research in 2022, including focus group discussions, in-depth interviews, document reviews and media analysis on the political economy of health taxes across eight low-income and middle-income countries. Studies captured multiple actors constructing context-specific frames, often tied to broader economic, health and administrative considerations. Findings suggest that no single frame dominates; in fact, a plurality of different frames exist and shape discourse and policymaking. There was no clear trade-off between health and economic framing of health tax policy proposals, nor a straightforward way to handle concerns around earmarking. Understanding how to best position health taxes can empower health policymakers with more persuasive framings for health taxes and can support them to develop broader coalitions to advance health taxes. These insights can improve efforts to advance health taxes by better appreciating political economy factors and constraining corporate power, ultimately leading to improved population-level health.

摘要

健康税是挽救生命、增加政府收入和提高公平性的有效政策工具。然而,健康税直接与商业行为者的利益发生冲突。支持征税的健康倡导者和反税产业代表都试图构建健康税收政策框架。然而,对于哪些框架在哪些情况下产生共鸣,以及框架如何最有效地推动或限制政策,我们知之甚少。为了填补这一空白,我们于 2022 年进行了定性研究,包括在八个低收入和中等收入国家进行了焦点小组讨论、深入访谈、文献回顾和媒体分析,研究了健康税的政治经济学。研究报告捕捉到了多个行为者构建特定背景的框架,这些框架往往与更广泛的经济、健康和行政考虑有关。研究结果表明,没有一个单一的框架占主导地位;实际上,存在多种不同的框架,并塑造了话语和决策制定。健康税政策提案的健康和经济框架之间没有明显的取舍,也没有简单的方法来处理专用性问题。了解如何最好地定位健康税,可以使卫生政策制定者更有说服力地制定健康税框架,并支持他们发展更广泛的联盟来推进健康税。这些见解可以通过更好地理解政治经济因素和限制企业权力来改善推进健康税的努力,最终提高人口健康水平。

相似文献

1
Framing health taxes: learning from low- and middle-income countries.健康税的构建:从中低收入国家中学习。
BMJ Glob Health. 2023 Oct;8(Suppl 8). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-012955.
2
Framing health taxes: a scoping review.健康税的框架构建:范围综述。
BMJ Glob Health. 2023 Oct;8(Suppl 8). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-012055.
3
Watered down: a cross-case political economy analysis of sugar-sweetened beverage taxes in Vanuatu and Fiji.稀释的政策:瓦努阿图和斐济含糖饮料税的跨案例政治经济学分析。
Health Promot Int. 2024 Dec 1;39(6). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daae142.
4
Policy lessons from health taxes: a systematic review of empirical studies.健康税的政策教训:实证研究的系统综述
BMC Public Health. 2017 Jun 19;17(1):583. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4497-z.
5
A sweet deal for domestic industry: the political economy and framing of Vanuatu's sugar-sweetened beverage tax.为国内产业带来的甜蜜交易:瓦努阿图含糖饮料税的政治经济与框架。
BMJ Glob Health. 2023 Oct;8(Suppl 8). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-012025.
6
Political economy analysis of health taxes (tobacco, alcohol drink and sugar-sweteened beverage): qualitative study of three provinces in Indonesia.卫生税(烟草、酒精饮料和含糖饮料)的政治经济学分析:印度尼西亚三个省份的定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2024 Aug 6;14(8):e085863. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085863.
7
A comparative policy analysis of the adoption and implementation of sugar-sweetened beverage taxes (2016-19) in 16 countries.16 个国家(2016-19 年)征收含糖饮料税的采纳和实施的比较政策分析。
Health Policy Plan. 2022 May 12;37(5):543-564. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czac004.
8
Policy Process And Non-State Actors' Influence On The 2014 Mexican Soda Tax.政策过程与非国家行为体对 2014 年墨西哥苏打税的影响。
Health Policy Plan. 2020 Oct 1;35(8):941-952. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czaa060.
9
Concepts of responsibility in the German media debate on sugar taxation: a qualitative framing analysis.德国媒体关于糖税辩论中的责任概念:定性框架分析。
Eur J Public Health. 2022 Apr 1;32(2):267-272. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckab200.
10
'Sweet talk': framing the merits of a sugar tax in Australia.“甜蜜的话语”:在澳大利亚为糖税的优点进行框定。
Health Promot Int. 2021 Oct 13;36(5):1334-1345. doi: 10.1093/heapro/daaa152.

引用本文的文献

1
"": Competing Framing Strategies for Child Road Safety Policy in the Philippines.《菲律宾儿童道路安全政策的竞争框架策略》
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2025;14:8585. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.8585. Epub 2025 Jul 21.
2
Sugar, power and policy: The political economy of a health and economic 'win-win' in Fiji's sugar-sweetened beverage tax.糖、权力与政策:斐济含糖饮料税中健康与经济“双赢”的政治经济学
Global Health. 2025 Aug 4;21(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s12992-025-01139-y.
3
Watered down: a cross-case political economy analysis of sugar-sweetened beverage taxes in Vanuatu and Fiji.稀释的政策:瓦努阿图和斐济含糖饮料税的跨案例政治经济学分析。
Health Promot Int. 2024 Dec 1;39(6). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daae142.
4
Political economy analysis of health taxes (tobacco, alcohol drink and sugar-sweteened beverage): qualitative study of three provinces in Indonesia.卫生税(烟草、酒精饮料和含糖饮料)的政治经济学分析:印度尼西亚三个省份的定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2024 Aug 6;14(8):e085863. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085863.

本文引用的文献

1
Conflicting interests, institutional fragmentation and opportunity structures: an analysis of political institutions and the health taxes regime in Pakistan.利益冲突、制度碎片化和机会结构:对巴基斯坦政治制度和卫生税收制度的分析。
BMJ Glob Health. 2023 Oct;8(Suppl 8). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-012045.
2
Perceptions of key stakeholders on taxes on tobacco and alcohol products in Nepal.尼泊尔利益攸关方对烟草和酒类产品征税的看法。
BMJ Glob Health. 2023 Oct;8(Suppl 8). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-012040.
3
Framing, moral foundations and health taxes: interpretive analysis of Ethiopia's tobacco excise tax policy passage.框架、道德基础与健康税:对埃塞俄比亚烟草消费税政策通过的解释性分析。
BMJ Glob Health. 2023 Oct;8(Suppl 8). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-012058.
4
Considerations for modelling a broad food tax in the Philippines and other low-income and middle-income countries.菲律宾及其他低收入和中等收入国家制定广泛食品税政策的考虑因素。
BMJ Glob Health. 2023 Oct;8(Suppl 8). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-012068.
5
Health taxes in Indonesia: a review of policy debates on the tobacco, alcoholic beverages and sugar-sweetened beverage taxes in the media.印度尼西亚的健康税:对媒体中关于烟草、酒精饮料和含糖饮料税的政策辩论的回顾。
BMJ Glob Health. 2023 Oct;8(Suppl 8). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-012042.
6
Political and socioeconomic factors that shaped health taxes implementation in Peru.影响秘鲁健康税实施的政治和社会经济因素。
BMJ Glob Health. 2023 Oct;8(Suppl 8). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-012024.
7
Framing health taxes: a scoping review.健康税的框架构建:范围综述。
BMJ Glob Health. 2023 Oct;8(Suppl 8). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-012055.
8
An exploration of stakeholder views and perceptions on taxing tobacco, alcohol and sugar-sweetened beverages in Ghana.加纳对烟草、酒精和含糖饮料征税的利益相关者观点和看法的探索。
BMJ Glob Health. 2023 May;8(5). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-012054.
9
Commercial determinants of health: future directions.健康的商业决定因素:未来方向。
Lancet. 2023 Apr 8;401(10383):1229-1240. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00011-9. Epub 2023 Mar 23.
10
Defining and conceptualising the commercial determinants of health.定义健康的商业决定因素并形成其概念。
Lancet. 2023 Apr 8;401(10383):1194-1213. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00013-2. Epub 2023 Mar 23.