• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于机器学习的前列腺癌预测模型与可视化解读

Machine learning-based prediction model and visual interpretation for prostate cancer.

机构信息

School of Public Health and Management, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 325035, China.

School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Suzhou University of Science and Technology, Suzhou, 215009, China.

出版信息

BMC Urol. 2023 Oct 14;23(1):164. doi: 10.1186/s12894-023-01316-4.

DOI:10.1186/s12894-023-01316-4
PMID:37838656
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10576344/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Most prostate cancers(PCa) rely on serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing for biopsy confirmation, but the accuracy needs to be further improved. We need to continue to develop PCa prediction model with high clinical application value.

METHODS

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and prostate cancer data were obtained from the Chinese National Clinical Medical Science Data Center for retrospective analysis. The model was constructed using the XGBoost algorithm, and patients' age, body mass index (BMI), PSA-related parameters and serum biochemical parameters were used as model variables. Using decision analysis curve (DCA) to evaluate the clinical utility of the models. The shapley additive explanation (SHAP) framework was used to analyze the importance ranking and risk threshold of the variables.

RESULTS

A total of 1915 patients were included in this study, including 823 (43.0%) were BPH patients and 1092 (57.0%) were PCa patients. The XGBoost model provided better performance (AUC 0.82) compared with f/tPSA (AUC 0.75),tPSA (AUC 0.68) and fPSA (AUC 0.61), respectively. Based on SHAP values, f/tPSA was the most important variable, and the top five most important biochemical parameter variables were inorganic phosphorus (P), potassium (K), creatine kinase MB isoenzyme (CKMB), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), and creatinine (Cre). PCa risk thresholds for these risk markers were f/tPSA (0.13), P (1.29 mmol/L), K (4.29 mmol/L), CKMB ( 11.6U/L), LDL-C (3.05mmol/L) and Cre (74.5-99.1umol/L).

CONCLUSION

The present model has advantages of wide-spread availability and high net benefit, especially for underdeveloped countries and regions. Furthermore, these risk thresholds can assist in the diagnosis and screening of prostate cancer in clinical practice.

摘要

背景

大多数前列腺癌(PCa)依赖于血清前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)检测进行活检确认,但准确性需要进一步提高。我们需要继续开发具有高临床应用价值的 PCa 预测模型。

方法

良性前列腺增生(BPH)和前列腺癌数据来自中国国家临床医学科学数据中心进行回顾性分析。该模型使用 XGBoost 算法构建,模型变量包括患者年龄、体重指数(BMI)、PSA 相关参数和血清生化参数。使用决策分析曲线(DCA)评估模型的临床实用性。使用 Shapley 加性解释(SHAP)框架分析变量的重要性排名和风险阈值。

结果

本研究共纳入 1915 例患者,其中 823 例(43.0%)为 BPH 患者,1092 例(57.0%)为 PCa 患者。XGBoost 模型的表现优于 f/tPSA(AUC 为 0.75)、tPSA(AUC 为 0.68)和 fPSA(AUC 为 0.61)。基于 SHAP 值,f/tPSA 是最重要的变量,前五个最重要的生化参数变量为无机磷(P)、钾(K)、肌酸激酶同工酶 MB(CKMB)、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)和肌酐(Cre)。这些风险标志物的 PCa 风险阈值为 f/tPSA(0.13)、P(1.29mmol/L)、K(4.29mmol/L)、CKMB(11.6U/L)、LDL-C(3.05mmol/L)和 Cre(74.5-99.1umol/L)。

结论

本研究构建的模型具有广泛适用性和高净收益的优点,尤其适用于欠发达地区和国家。此外,这些风险阈值可协助临床实践中前列腺癌的诊断和筛查。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e7f/10576344/6b6565b4f7f9/12894_2023_1316_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e7f/10576344/61d913af41b4/12894_2023_1316_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e7f/10576344/566ac081fdc9/12894_2023_1316_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e7f/10576344/6b6565b4f7f9/12894_2023_1316_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e7f/10576344/61d913af41b4/12894_2023_1316_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e7f/10576344/566ac081fdc9/12894_2023_1316_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e7f/10576344/6b6565b4f7f9/12894_2023_1316_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Machine learning-based prediction model and visual interpretation for prostate cancer.基于机器学习的前列腺癌预测模型与可视化解读
BMC Urol. 2023 Oct 14;23(1):164. doi: 10.1186/s12894-023-01316-4.
2
Determination of alpha1-antichymotrypsin-PSA complex in serum does not improve the differentiation between benign prostatic hyperplasia and prostate cancer compared with total PSA and percent free PSA.与总前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)和游离PSA百分比相比,血清中α1-抗糜蛋白酶-PSA复合物的测定并不能改善良性前列腺增生和前列腺癌之间的鉴别。
Urology. 1999 Jun;53(6):1160-7; discussion 1167-8. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(99)00080-1.
3
Percentage of free serum prostate-specific antigen: a new tool in the early diagnosis of prostatic cancer.游离血清前列腺特异性抗原百分比:前列腺癌早期诊断的新工具。
Eur J Cancer. 1996 Nov;32A(12):2088-93. doi: 10.1016/s0959-8049(96)00245-6.
4
Comparison of the clinical validity of free prostate-specific antigen, alpha-1 antichymotrypsin-bound prostate-specific antigen and complexed prostate-specific antigen in prostate cancer diagnosis.游离前列腺特异性抗原、α1抗糜蛋白酶结合型前列腺特异性抗原及复合前列腺特异性抗原在前列腺癌诊断中临床有效性的比较
Eur Urol. 2001 Jan;39(1):57-64. doi: 10.1159/000052413.
5
Ratio of free or complexed prostate-specific antigen (PSA) to total PSA: which ratio improves differentiation between benign prostatic hyperplasia and prostate cancer?游离或复合前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)与总PSA的比值:哪种比值能改善良性前列腺增生与前列腺癌之间的鉴别诊断?
Clin Chem. 2000 Jan;46(1):55-62.
6
The clinical utility of measuring free-to-total prostate-specific antigen (PSA) ratio and PSA density in differentiating between benign prostatic hyperplasia and prostate cancer.测量游离前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)与总PSA比值及PSA密度在鉴别良性前列腺增生和前列腺癌中的临床应用。
Br J Urol. 1998 Jun;81(6):834-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.1998.00643.x.
7
[Changes of serum total PSA and free PSA in patients with prostate carcinoma and benign prostate hyperplasia].[前列腺癌和良性前列腺增生患者血清总前列腺特异性抗原及游离前列腺特异性抗原的变化]
Ai Zheng. 2004 Jun;23(6):701-3.
8
Machine-learning Algorithm-based Risk Prediction and Screening-detected Prostate Cancer in A Benign Prostate Hyperplasia Cohort.基于机器学习算法的风险预测和筛查检测在良性前列腺增生队列中的前列腺癌。
Anticancer Res. 2024 Apr;44(4):1683-1693. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.16967.
9
A multicenter clinical trial on the use of alpha1-antichymotrypsin-prostate-specific antigen in prostate cancer diagnosis.一项关于使用α1-抗糜蛋白酶-前列腺特异性抗原进行前列腺癌诊断的多中心临床试验。
Prostate. 2001 May 1;47(2):77-84. doi: 10.1002/pros.1049.
10
Determination of non-alpha1-antichymotrypsin-complexed prostate-specific antigen as an indirect measurement of free prostate-specific antigen: analytical performance and diagnostic accuracy.作为游离前列腺特异性抗原的间接检测方法,非α1-抗糜蛋白酶复合前列腺特异性抗原的测定:分析性能与诊断准确性
Clin Chem. 2003 Jun;49(6 Pt 1):887-94. doi: 10.1373/49.6.887.

引用本文的文献

1
Artificial intelligence-based risk assessment tools for sexual, reproductive and mental health: a systematic review.基于人工智能的性健康、生殖健康和心理健康风险评估工具:一项系统综述
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2025 Mar 17;25(1):132. doi: 10.1186/s12911-025-02864-5.
2
Prediction of Prostate Cancer From Routine Laboratory Markers With Automated Machine Learning.利用自动化机器学习通过常规实验室指标预测前列腺癌
J Clin Lab Anal. 2025 Feb;39(3):e25143. doi: 10.1002/jcla.25143. Epub 2025 Jan 19.
3
PyCaret for Predicting Type 2 Diabetes: A Phenotype- and Gender-Based Approach with the "Nurses' Health Study" and the "Health Professionals' Follow-Up Study" Datasets.

本文引用的文献

1
XGBoost-based and tumor-immune characterized gene signature for the prediction of metastatic status in breast cancer.基于 XGBoost 的肿瘤免疫特征基因标志物用于预测乳腺癌的转移状态。
J Transl Med. 2022 Apr 18;20(1):177. doi: 10.1186/s12967-022-03369-9.
2
Application of Machine Learning Techniques to Predict Bone Metastasis in Patients with Prostate Cancer.应用机器学习技术预测前列腺癌患者的骨转移
Cancer Manag Res. 2021 Nov 23;13:8723-8736. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S330591. eCollection 2021.
3
Circulating phosphorus concentration and risk of prostate cancer: a Mendelian randomization study.
使用“护士健康研究”和“卫生专业人员随访研究”数据集,基于表型和性别的方法,用PyCaret预测2型糖尿病
J Pers Med. 2024 Jul 29;14(8):804. doi: 10.3390/jpm14080804.
4
Integrating Omics Data and AI for Cancer Diagnosis and Prognosis.整合组学数据与人工智能用于癌症诊断和预后评估
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Jul 3;16(13):2448. doi: 10.3390/cancers16132448.
循环磷浓度与前列腺癌风险:一项孟德尔随机化研究。
Am J Clin Nutr. 2022 Feb 9;115(2):534-543. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqab342.
4
Based on biomedical index data: Risk prediction model for prostate cancer.基于生物医学指标数据:前列腺癌风险预测模型。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Apr 30;100(17):e25602. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000025602.
5
PSA-based machine learning model improves prostate cancer risk stratification in a screening population.基于 PSA 的机器学习模型可提高筛查人群中前列腺癌的风险分层。
World J Urol. 2021 Jun;39(6):1897-1902. doi: 10.1007/s00345-020-03392-9. Epub 2020 Aug 3.
6
Cancer statistics, 2020.癌症统计数据,2020 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2020 Jan;70(1):7-30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21590. Epub 2020 Jan 8.
7
Diagnostic accuracy of prostate cancer antigen 3 (PCA3) prior to first prostate biopsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.首次前列腺活检前前列腺癌抗原3(PCA3)的诊断准确性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Can Urol Assoc J. 2020 May;14(5):E214-E219. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.6008. Epub 2019 Nov 29.
8
Associations between serum potassium and adverse clinical outcomes: A systematic literature review.血清钾与不良临床结局的关系:系统文献回顾。
Int J Clin Pract. 2020 Jan;74(1):e13421. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.13421. Epub 2019 Nov 15.
9
Next-Generation Machine Learning for Biological Networks.下一代生物网络机器学习。
Cell. 2018 Jun 14;173(7):1581-1592. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.05.015. Epub 2018 Jun 7.
10
Screening for Prostate Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.前列腺癌筛查:美国预防服务工作组推荐声明。
JAMA. 2018 May 8;319(18):1901-1913. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.3710.