• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

真空辅助活检证实的 DCIS 的手术升级率:对主动监测试验的影响。

Surgical Upstaging Rates for Vacuum Assisted Biopsy Proven DCIS: Implications for Active Surveillance Trials.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.

Department of Mathematics, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.

出版信息

Ann Surg Oncol. 2017 Nov;24(12):3534-3540. doi: 10.1245/s10434-017-6018-9. Epub 2017 Aug 9.

DOI:10.1245/s10434-017-6018-9
PMID:28795370
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6414216/
Abstract

PURPOSE

This study was designed to determine invasive cancer upstaging rates at surgical excision following vacuum-assisted biopsy of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) among women meeting eligibility for active surveillance trials.

METHODS

Patients with vacuum-assisted, biopsy-proven DCIS at a single center from 2008 to 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. Imaging and pathology reports were interrogated for the imaging appearance, tumor grade, hormone receptor status, and presence of comedonecrosis. Subsequent surgical reports were reviewed for upstaging to invasive disease. Cases were classified by eligibility criteria for the COMET, LORIS, and LORD DCIS active surveillance trials.

RESULTS

Of 307 DCIS diagnoses, 15 (5%) were low, 95 (31%) intermediate, and 197 (64%) high nuclear grade. The overall upstage rate to invasive disease was 17% (53/307). Eighty-one patients were eligible for the COMET Trial, 74 for the LORIS trial, and 10 for the LORD Trial, although LORIS trial eligibility also included real-time, multiple central pathology review, including elements not routinely reported. The upstaging rates to invasive disease were 6% (5/81), 7% (5/74), and 10% (1/10) for the COMET, LORIS, and LORD trials, respectively. Among upstaged cancers (n = 5), four tumors were Stage IA invasive ductal carcinoma and one was Stage IIA invasive lobular carcinoma; all were node-negative.

CONCLUSIONS

DCIS upstaging rates in women eligible for active surveillance trials are low (6-10%), and in this series, all those with invasive disease were early-stage, node-negative. The careful patient selection for DCIS active surveillance trials has a low risk of missing occult invasive cancer and additional studies will determine clinical outcomes.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定符合主动监测试验入选标准的导管原位癌(DCIS)患者行真空辅助活检(VAB)后行手术切除的浸润性癌升级率。

方法

回顾性分析 2008 年至 2015 年期间于单一中心行 VAB 证实为 DCIS 的患者。对影像学和病理学报告进行了调查,以评估影像学表现、肿瘤分级、激素受体状态和有无粉刺样坏死。对后续手术报告进行了审查,以确定是否升级为浸润性疾病。根据 COMET、LORIS 和 LORD DCIS 主动监测试验的入选标准对病例进行分类。

结果

307 例 DCIS 诊断中,低级别 15 例(5%),中级别 95 例(31%),高级别 197 例(64%)。总体而言,浸润性疾病升级率为 17%(53/307)。81 例患者符合 COMET 试验入选标准,74 例符合 LORIS 试验入选标准,10 例符合 LORD 试验入选标准,但 LORIS 试验入选标准还包括实时、多中心病理复查,包括常规不报告的内容。COMET、LORIS 和 LORD 试验的浸润性疾病升级率分别为 6%(5/81)、7%(5/74)和 10%(1/10)。在升级的癌症(n=5)中,4 例为 IA 期浸润性导管癌,1 例为 IIA 期浸润性小叶癌;所有患者均无淋巴结转移。

结论

符合主动监测试验入选标准的 DCIS 升级率较低(6-10%),在本系列中,所有浸润性疾病均为早期、无淋巴结转移的疾病。对 DCIS 主动监测试验进行了严格的患者选择,其漏诊隐匿性浸润性癌的风险较低,还需要进一步的研究来确定临床结局。

相似文献

1
Surgical Upstaging Rates for Vacuum Assisted Biopsy Proven DCIS: Implications for Active Surveillance Trials.真空辅助活检证实的 DCIS 的手术升级率:对主动监测试验的影响。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2017 Nov;24(12):3534-3540. doi: 10.1245/s10434-017-6018-9. Epub 2017 Aug 9.
2
Do Eligibility Criteria for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ (DCIS) Active Surveillance Trials Identify Patients at Low Risk for Upgrade to Invasive Carcinoma?导管原位癌(DCIS)主动监测试验的纳入标准能否识别低风险升级为浸润性癌的患者?
Ann Surg Oncol. 2020 Oct;27(11):4459-4465. doi: 10.1245/s10434-020-08576-6. Epub 2020 May 16.
3
Concordance between vacuum assisted biopsy and postoperative histology: implications for the proposed Low Risk DCIS Trial (LORIS).真空辅助活检与术后组织学的一致性:对拟议的低危 DCIS 试验(LORIS)的影响。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2013 Dec;39(12):1337-40. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2013.09.028. Epub 2013 Oct 9.
4
Surgical upstaging rates in patients meeting the eligibility for active surveillance trials.符合主动监测试验入选标准患者的手术分期率。
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2021 Aug 1;51(8):1219-1224. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyab082.
5
Do LORIS Trial Eligibility Criteria Identify a Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Patient Population at Low Risk of Upgrade to Invasive Carcinoma?LORIS试验的入选标准能否识别出原位导管癌患者中升级为浸润性癌风险较低的人群?
Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 Oct;23(11):3487-3493. doi: 10.1245/s10434-016-5268-2. Epub 2016 May 12.
6
Preoperatively diagnosed ductal cancers in situ of the breast presenting as even small masses are of high risk for the invasive cancer foci in postoperative specimen.术前诊断为原位导管癌的乳腺,即使表现为小肿块,术后标本中出现浸润性癌灶的风险也很高。
World J Surg Oncol. 2015 Jul 16;13:218. doi: 10.1186/s12957-015-0641-3.
7
Feasibility of the Less Is More Approach in Treating Low-Risk Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Diagnosed on Core Needle Biopsy: Ten-Year Review of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Upgraded to Invasion at Surgery.低危核心针活检诊断为导管原位癌(DCIS)中“少即是多”治疗策略的可行性:手术时升级为浸润性癌的 DCIS 十年回顾。
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2018 Sep;142(9):1120-1126. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2017-0268-OA. Epub 2018 Mar 27.
8
Women with Low-Risk DCIS Eligible for the LORIS Trial After Complete Surgical Excision: How Low Is Their Risk After Standard Therapy?完全手术切除后符合LORIS试验条件的低风险导管原位癌女性:标准治疗后她们的风险有多低?
Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 Dec;23(13):4253-4261. doi: 10.1245/s10434-016-5595-3. Epub 2016 Oct 20.
9
Is it possible to predict underestimation in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast? Yes, using a simple score!是否有可能预测乳腺导管原位癌的低估?可以,使用一个简单的评分!
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2019 Jul;45(7):1152-1155. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2019.01.015. Epub 2019 Jan 14.
10
Sentinel lymph node biopsy is not necessary in patients diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast by stereotactic vacuum-assisted biopsy.对于通过立体定位真空辅助活检诊断为乳腺导管原位癌的患者,前哨淋巴结活检并非必要。
Breast Cancer. 2016 Mar;23(2):190-4. doi: 10.1007/s12282-014-0546-y. Epub 2014 Jul 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Prediction of upstaging in DCIS: the dominant role of pathological over imaging risk factors.导管原位癌(DCIS)分期升级的预测:病理因素相较于影像学风险因素的主导作用
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2025 Oct;213(3):325-334. doi: 10.1007/s10549-025-07768-6. Epub 2025 Aug 1.
2
Cancer outcomes in women without upfront surgery for ductal carcinoma in situ: observational cohort study.导管原位癌未进行 upfront 手术的女性的癌症结局:观察性队列研究。 注:这里“upfront surgery”直译为“前期手术”,可能在医学语境中有更准确的特定含义,需结合具体专业知识进一步理解。
BMJ. 2025 Jul 8;390:e083542. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2024-083542.
3
The DCIS-IBC guide board on predicting postoperative upgrading in breast ductal carcinoma in situ: clinical insights from a multicenter study.乳腺导管原位癌术后升级预测的DCIS-IBC指南委员会:一项多中心研究的临床见解
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2025 Jun 30. doi: 10.1007/s10549-025-07763-x.
4
Preoperative MRI to Predict Upstaging of DCIS to Invasive Cancer at Surgery.术前MRI预测手术时导管原位癌升级为浸润性癌的情况。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 May;32(5):3234-3243. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-16837-x. Epub 2025 Jan 28.
5
The diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound combined with clinicopathological features in microinvasive ductal carcinoma .超声造影联合临床病理特征在微浸润性导管癌中的诊断价值
Gland Surg. 2024 Nov 30;13(11):1894-1906. doi: 10.21037/gs-24-211. Epub 2024 Nov 26.
6
Active Monitoring With or Without Endocrine Therapy for Low-Risk Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: The COMET Randomized Clinical Trial.低风险导管原位癌采用或不采用内分泌治疗的主动监测:COMET随机临床试验
JAMA. 2025 Mar 18;333(11):972-980. doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.26698.
7
Evaluation of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes as a prognostic biomarker in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.评估肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞作为乳腺导管原位癌患者的预后生物标志物。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2024 Nov;208(1):9-18. doi: 10.1007/s10549-024-07466-9. Epub 2024 Aug 24.
8
Outcomes from low-risk ductal carcinoma in situ: a systematic review and meta-analysis.低危型导管原位癌的结局:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2024 Nov;208(2):237-251. doi: 10.1007/s10549-024-07473-w. Epub 2024 Aug 24.
9
Potential Overtreatment of DCIS in Patients with Limited Life Expectancy.预期寿命有限的患者中 DCIS 的过度治疗问题。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Oct;31(10):6812-6819. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-15894-6. Epub 2024 Jul 20.
10
Radiology for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast: Updates on Invasive Cancer Progression and Active Monitoring.乳腺导管原位癌的放射学:浸润性癌进展和主动监测的更新。
Korean J Radiol. 2024 Aug;25(8):698-705. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2024.0117. Epub 2024 Jul 4.

本文引用的文献

1
Treatment of low-risk ductal carcinoma in situ: is nothing better than something?低危型导管原位癌的治疗:多此一举?
Lancet Oncol. 2016 Oct;17(10):e442-e451. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30367-9.
2
Breast-Cancer Tumor Size, Overdiagnosis, and Mammography Screening Effectiveness.乳腺癌肿瘤大小、过度诊断与乳腺 X 线筛查效果
N Engl J Med. 2016 Oct 13;375(15):1438-1447. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1600249.
3
Extent of ductal carcinoma in situ according to breast cancer subtypes: a population-based cohort study.根据乳腺癌亚型分析导管原位癌的范围:一项基于人群的队列研究。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2016 Jul;158(1):179-187. doi: 10.1007/s10549-016-3862-4. Epub 2016 Jun 18.
4
Do LORIS Trial Eligibility Criteria Identify a Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Patient Population at Low Risk of Upgrade to Invasive Carcinoma?LORIS试验的入选标准能否识别出原位导管癌患者中升级为浸润性癌风险较低的人群?
Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 Oct;23(11):3487-3493. doi: 10.1245/s10434-016-5268-2. Epub 2016 May 12.
5
Outcomes of Active Surveillance for Ductal Carcinoma in Situ: A Computational Risk Analysis.导管原位癌主动监测的结果:一项计算风险分析
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015 Dec 17;108(5). doi: 10.1093/jnci/djv372. Print 2016 May.
6
Addressing overtreatment of screen detected DCIS; the LORIS trial.解决过度治疗筛查出的 DCIS 问题;LORIS 试验。
Eur J Cancer. 2015 Nov;51(16):2296-303. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.07.017. Epub 2015 Aug 18.
7
Survival Benefit of Breast Surgery for Low-Grade Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: A Population-Based Cohort Study.低级别导管原位癌行乳腺手术的生存获益:基于人群的队列研究。
JAMA Surg. 2015 Aug;150(8):739-45. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2015.0876.
8
Feasibility of a prospective, randomised, open-label, international multicentre, phase III, non-inferiority trial to assess the safety of active surveillance for low risk ductal carcinoma in situ - The LORD study.一项前瞻性、随机、开放标签、国际多中心、III期、非劣效性试验评估低风险导管原位癌主动监测安全性的可行性——LORD研究
Eur J Cancer. 2015 Aug;51(12):1497-510. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.05.008. Epub 2015 May 26.
9
Diagnostic concordance among pathologists interpreting breast biopsy specimens.解读乳腺活检标本的病理学家之间的诊断一致性。
JAMA. 2015 Mar 17;313(11):1122-32. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.1405.
10
Screening mammography guidelines: an alternative proactive approach.乳腺钼靶筛查指南:一种替代性的主动方法。
Radiology. 2014 Dec;273(3):646-51. doi: 10.1148/radiol.14140958.