• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用人工智能对重症患者的疼痛进行连续可视化和验证:一项回顾性观察研究。

Continuous visualization and validation of pain in critically ill patients using artificial intelligence: a retrospective observational study.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan.

Hitachi Solutions East Japan, Ltd, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2023 Oct 14;13(1):17479. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-44970-2.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-023-44970-2
PMID:37838818
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10576770/
Abstract

Machine learning tools have demonstrated viability in visualizing pain accurately using vital sign data; however, it remains uncertain whether incorporating individual patient baselines could enhance accuracy. This study aimed to investigate improving the accuracy by incorporating deviations from baseline patient vital signs and the concurrence of the predicted artificial intelligence values with the probability of critical care pain observation tool (CPOT) ≥ 3 after fentanyl administration. The study included adult patients in intensive care who underwent multiple pain-related assessments. We employed a random forest model, utilizing arterial pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate, gender, age, and Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale score as explanatory variables. Pain was measured as the probability of CPOT scores of ≥ 3, and subsequently adjusted based on each patient's baseline. The study included 10,299 patients with 117,190 CPOT assessments. Of these, 3.3% had CPOT scores of ≥ 3. The random forest model demonstrated strong accuracy with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.903. Patients treated with fentanyl were grouped based on CPOT score improvement. Those with ≥ 1-h of improvement after fentanyl administration had a significantly lower pain index (P = 0.020). Therefore, incorporating deviations from baseline patient vital signs improved the accuracy of pain visualization using machine learning techniques.

摘要

机器学习工具已证明在使用生命体征数据准确可视化疼痛方面具有可行性;然而,尚不确定是否可以通过纳入患者个体基线来提高准确性。本研究旨在通过纳入患者生命体征基线偏差以及预测人工智能值与芬太尼给药后疼痛观察工具(CPOT)≥3 的概率的一致性来提高准确性。该研究纳入了接受多次疼痛相关评估的重症监护成人患者。我们使用随机森林模型,利用动脉压、心率、呼吸率、性别、年龄和 Richmond 躁动镇静评分作为解释变量。疼痛测量为 CPOT 评分≥3 的概率,随后根据每位患者的基线进行调整。该研究共纳入了 10299 名患者,共进行了 117190 次 CPOT 评估。其中,3.3%的患者 CPOT 评分≥3。随机森林模型具有很强的准确性,其受试者工作特征曲线下面积为 0.903。根据 CPOT 评分的改善,对接受芬太尼治疗的患者进行分组。在芬太尼给药后改善≥1 小时的患者疼痛指数显著降低(P=0.020)。因此,通过纳入患者生命体征基线偏差,可以提高使用机器学习技术进行疼痛可视化的准确性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b695/10576770/d9480731f709/41598_2023_44970_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b695/10576770/3dcccd3753ab/41598_2023_44970_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b695/10576770/4a2082df7d1b/41598_2023_44970_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b695/10576770/d9480731f709/41598_2023_44970_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b695/10576770/3dcccd3753ab/41598_2023_44970_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b695/10576770/4a2082df7d1b/41598_2023_44970_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b695/10576770/d9480731f709/41598_2023_44970_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Continuous visualization and validation of pain in critically ill patients using artificial intelligence: a retrospective observational study.使用人工智能对重症患者的疼痛进行连续可视化和验证:一项回顾性观察研究。
Sci Rep. 2023 Oct 14;13(1):17479. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-44970-2.
2
Semi-automated tracking of pain in critical care patients using artificial intelligence: a retrospective observational study.使用人工智能对重症监护患者的疼痛进行半自动跟踪:一项回顾性观察研究。
Sci Rep. 2021 Mar 4;11(1):5229. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-84714-8.
3
Use of the critical-care pain observation tool and the bispectral index for the detection of pain in brain-injured patients undergoing mechanical ventilation: A STROBE-compliant observational study.使用重症监护疼痛观察工具和脑电双频指数检测接受机械通气的脑损伤患者的疼痛:一项符合STROBE标准的观察性研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Jun;97(22):e10985. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000010985.
4
Validation and evaluation of two observational pain assessment tools in a trauma and neurosurgical intensive care unit.验证和评估创伤和神经外科重症监护病房中两种观察性疼痛评估工具。
Pain Res Manag. 2013 Nov-Dec;18(6):e107-14. doi: 10.1155/2013/263104.
5
Pain Measurement in Mechanically Ventilated Patients After Cardiac Surgery: Comparison of the Behavioral Pain Scale (BPS) and the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT).心脏手术后机械通气患者的疼痛测量:行为疼痛量表(BPS)与重症监护疼痛观察工具(CPOT)的比较
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2017 Aug;31(4):1227-1234. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2017.03.013. Epub 2017 Mar 15.
6
The German version of the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool for critically ill adults : A prospective validation study.用于危重症成人的重症监护疼痛观察工具德文版:一项前瞻性验证研究。
Anaesthesist. 2019 Dec;68(12):836-842. doi: 10.1007/s00101-019-00694-5. Epub 2019 Nov 20.
7
Validation of the use of the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT) with brain surgery patients in the neurosurgical intensive care unit.在神经外科重症监护病房中,针对脑外科手术患者使用重症监护疼痛观察工具(CPOT)的有效性验证。
Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2014 Oct;30(5):257-65. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2014.04.002. Epub 2014 May 14.
8
Pain assessment using the critical-care pain observation tool in Chinese critically ill ventilated adults.在中国接受机械通气的成年危重症患者中使用重症监护疼痛观察工具进行疼痛评估。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2014 Nov;48(5):975-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2014.01.014. Epub 2014 Apr 30.
9
Correlation of the Critical Care Pain Observation Tool and Numeric Rating Scale in Intensive Care Unit Patients.重症监护疼痛观察工具与数字评分量表在重症监护病房患者中的相关性。
J Intensive Care Med. 2024 Jan;39(1):12-20. doi: 10.1177/08850666231187336. Epub 2023 Jul 16.
10
Evaluation of Two Observational Pain Assessment Tools in Chinese Critically Ill Patients.两种观察性疼痛评估工具在中国重症患者中的评估
Pain Med. 2015 Aug;16(8):1622-8. doi: 10.1111/pme.12742. Epub 2015 Mar 20.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation of Pain Scales and Outcome in Critically Ill Patients of a Greek ICU.希腊重症监护病房危重症患者疼痛量表及预后评估
J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother. 2023 Mar;37(1):34-43. doi: 10.1080/15360288.2022.2149668. Epub 2022 Dec 13.
2
Monitoring pain in the intensive care unit (ICU).重症监护病房(ICU)中的疼痛监测。
Intensive Care Med. 2022 Oct;48(10):1508-1511. doi: 10.1007/s00134-022-06807-w. Epub 2022 Jul 29.
3
Validation Testing of the European Portuguese Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool.欧洲葡萄牙语重症监护疼痛观察工具的验证测试
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Jun 9;10(6):1075. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10061075.
4
Exploration of a Multi-Parameter Technology for Pain Assessment in Postoperative Patients After Cardiac Surgery in the Intensive Care Unit: The Nociception Level Index (NOL).重症监护病房心脏手术后患者疼痛评估的多参数技术探索:伤害感受水平指数(NOL)
J Pain Res. 2021 Dec 7;14:3723-3731. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S332845. eCollection 2021.
5
Determinants of pain assessment documentation in intensive care units.重症监护病房疼痛评估记录的决定因素。
Can J Anaesth. 2021 Aug;68(8):1176-1184. doi: 10.1007/s12630-021-02022-1. Epub 2021 Jun 8.
6
Validation of the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool-Neuro in brain-injured adults in the intensive care unit: a prospective cohort study.重症监护疼痛观察工具-神经在 ICU 脑损伤成人中的验证:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Crit Care. 2021 Apr 13;25(1):142. doi: 10.1186/s13054-021-03561-1.
7
Semi-automated tracking of pain in critical care patients using artificial intelligence: a retrospective observational study.使用人工智能对重症监护患者的疼痛进行半自动跟踪:一项回顾性观察研究。
Sci Rep. 2021 Mar 4;11(1):5229. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-84714-8.
8
Analgesia and sedation in patients with ARDS.急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者的镇痛与镇静。
Intensive Care Med. 2020 Dec;46(12):2342-2356. doi: 10.1007/s00134-020-06307-9. Epub 2020 Nov 10.
9
Exploration of the Nociception Level (NOL™) Index for Pain Assessment during Endotracheal Suctioning in Mechanically Ventilated Patients in the Intensive Care Unit: An Observational and Feasibility Study.《在重症监护病房中机械通气患者进行气管内吸引时使用 Nociception Level(NOL™)指数评估疼痛的探索:一项观察性和可行性研究》
Pain Manag Nurs. 2020 Oct;21(5):428-434. doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2020.02.067. Epub 2020 Apr 27.
10
A Psychometric Analysis Update of Behavioral Pain Assessment Tools for Noncommunicative, Critically Ill Adults.针对无交流能力的危重症成年患者的行为疼痛评估工具的心理测量分析更新
AACN Adv Crit Care. 2019 Dec 15;30(4):365-387. doi: 10.4037/aacnacc2019952.