Suppr超能文献

2020年7月至2021年7月,莱索托新型LeCellPHIA参与式监测系统的流感样疾病(ILI)发病率数据与新冠肺炎病例计数数据的比较。

Comparison of Influenza-Like Illness (ILI) incidence data from the novel LeCellPHIA participatory surveillance system with COVID-19 case count data, Lesotho, July 2020 - July 2021.

作者信息

Francis Sarah D, Mwima Gerald, Lethoko Molibeli, Chang Christiana, Farley Shannon M, Asiimwe Fred, Chen Qixuan, West Christine, Greenleaf Abigail R

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, USA.

ICAP at Lesotho, Maseru, Lesotho.

出版信息

BMC Infect Dis. 2023 Oct 16;23(1):688. doi: 10.1186/s12879-023-08664-4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

While laboratory testing for infectious diseases such as COVID-19 is the surveillance gold standard, it is not always feasible, particularly in settings where resources are scarce. In the small country of Lesotho, located in sub-Saharan Africa, COVID-19 testing has been limited, thus surveillance data available to local authorities are limited. The goal of this study was to compare a participatory influenza-like illness (ILI) surveillance system in Lesotho with COVID-19 case count data, and ultimately to determine whether the participatory surveillance system adequately estimates the case count data.

METHODS

A nationally-representative sample was called on their mobile phones weekly to create an estimate of incidence of ILI between July 2020 and July 2021. Case counts from the website Our World in Data (OWID) were used as the gold standard to which our participatory surveillance data were compared. We calculated Spearman's and Pearson's correlation coefficients to compare the weekly incidence of ILI reports to COVID-19 case count data.

RESULTS

Over course of the study period, an ILI symptom was reported 1,085 times via participatory surveillance for an average annual cumulative incidence of 45.7 per 100 people (95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 40.7 - 51.4). The cumulative incidence of reports of ILI symptoms was similar among males (46.5, 95% CI: 39.6 - 54.4) and females (45.1, 95% CI: 39.8 - 51.1). There was a slightly higher annual cumulative incidence of ILI among persons living in peri-urban (49.5, 95% CI: 31.7 - 77.3) and urban settings compared to rural areas. The January peak of the participatory surveillance system ILI estimates correlated significantly with the January peak of the COVID-19 case count data (Spearman's correlation coefficient = 0.49; P < 0.001) (Pearson's correlation coefficient = 0.67; P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

The ILI trends captured by the participatory surveillance system in Lesotho mirrored trends of the COVID-19 case count data from Our World in Data. Public health practitioners in geographies that lack the resources to conduct direct surveillance of infectious diseases may be able to use cell phone-based data collection to monitor trends.

摘要

背景

虽然对 COVID-19 等传染病进行实验室检测是监测的金标准,但并非总是可行,特别是在资源稀缺的环境中。在撒哈拉以南非洲的小国莱索托,COVID-19 检测一直有限,因此地方当局可获得的监测数据也有限。本研究的目的是比较莱索托的参与式流感样疾病(ILI)监测系统与 COVID-19 病例计数数据,并最终确定参与式监测系统是否能充分估计病例计数数据。

方法

每周通过手机对全国代表性样本进行电话访问,以估计 2020 年 7 月至 2021 年 7 月期间 ILI 的发病率。将来自“Our World in Data”(OWID)网站的病例计数用作金标准,与我们的参与式监测数据进行比较。我们计算了 Spearman 相关系数和 Pearson 相关系数,以比较 ILI 报告的每周发病率与 COVID-19 病例计数数据。

结果

在研究期间,通过参与式监测报告了 1085 次 ILI 症状,平均年累积发病率为每 100 人 45.7 例(95%置信区间[CI]:40.7 - 51.4)。ILI 症状报告的累积发病率在男性(46.5,95%CI:39.6 - 54.4)和女性(45.1,95%CI:39.8 - 51.1)中相似。与农村地区相比,生活在城郊(49.5,95%CI:31.7 - 77.3)和城市地区的人群中 ILI 的年累积发病率略高。参与式监测系统 ILI 估计值的 1 月峰值与 COVID-19 病例计数数据的 1 月峰值显著相关(Spearman 相关系数 = 0.49;P < 0.001)(Pearson 相关系数 = 0.67;P < 0.0001)。

结论

莱索托参与式监测系统捕获的 ILI 趋势反映了“Our World in Data”中 COVID-19 病例计数数据的趋势。在缺乏对传染病进行直接监测资源的地区,公共卫生从业者或许能够利用基于手机的数据收集来监测趋势。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c984/10577929/1a9ac906b2ee/12879_2023_8664_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验