Department of Computer Engineering, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran.
Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, Iran.
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2023 Oct 10;2023:6271241. doi: 10.1155/2023/6271241. eCollection 2023.
There is a growing need for manufacturing processes that improve product quality and production rates while reducing costs. With the advent of multisensory information fusion technology, individuals can acquire a broader range of information. Several data fusion and machine learning methods have been discussed in this article within the context of the Industry 4.0 paradigm. Depending on its purpose, a prognostic method can be categorized as descriptive, predictive, or prescriptive. ANN and CNN models are applied to predicting production costs using neural networks based on multisource information fusion, and multisource information fusion theory is examined and applied to ANNs and CNNs. In this study, ANN and CNN predictions have been compared. CNN has demonstrated more remarkable skill in predicting the six cost categories than ANN. When predicting the true value of each cost category, CNN is superior to ANN. As a result, CNN's forecast error for the current month's total income is 0.0234. Because of its improved prediction accuracy and more straightforward training technique, CNN is better suited to incorporating information from several sources. Furthermore, both neural networks overestimate indirect costs, including direct material costs and item consumption prices.
人们越来越需要制造工艺来提高产品质量和生产效率,同时降低成本。随着多感官信息融合技术的出现,人们可以获取更广泛的信息。本文在工业 4.0 范例的背景下讨论了几种数据融合和机器学习方法。根据其目的,预测方法可以分为描述性、预测性或规定性。基于多源信息融合,应用 ANN 和 CNN 模型通过神经网络预测生产成本,研究和应用多源信息融合理论于 ANN 和 CNN。本文比较了 ANN 和 CNN 的预测结果。CNN 在预测六个成本类别方面的表现明显优于 ANN。在预测每个成本类别的真实值时,CNN 优于 ANN。因此,CNN 对当前月份总收入的预测误差为 0.0234。由于其提高的预测准确性和更简单的训练技术,CNN 更适合整合来自多个来源的信息。此外,两种神经网络都高估了间接成本,包括直接材料成本和项目消耗价格。