Suppr超能文献

了解与大麻相关的信息需求:对国家癌症研究所癌症信息服务的咨询分析。

Understanding Cannabis-Related Information Needs: An Analysis of Inquiries to the National Cancer Institute's Cancer Information Service.

机构信息

Behavioral Research Program, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland, USA.

Public Health and Epidemiology, Westat, Rockville, Maryland, USA.

出版信息

Cannabis Cannabinoid Res. 2024 Oct;9(5):e1452-e1458. doi: 10.1089/can.2023.0119. Epub 2023 Oct 19.

Abstract

Given increased cannabis use for medical and nonmedical purposes alike, there is growing public interest related to the potential risks and benefits of cannabis use, particularly related to cancer. The purpose of this descriptive study was to analyze cannabis inquiries to the National Cancer Institute's Cancer Information Service (CIS). From September 2018 to June 2023, 190,070 noncannabis and 425 cannabis inquiries were documented by the CIS. Cannabis inquiries were delineated into two categories: nonmedical cannabis (NMC, =240) or medical cannabis (MC, =185). Chi-square tests were performed to determine differences between noncannabis and cannabis inquiries and descriptive analyses were used to identify patterns within cannabis-specific inquiries. Statistically significant differences between noncannabis and cannabis inquiries were observed. In addition, there were variations in MC and NMC inquiries. For example, 73% of MC inquiries originated from cancer survivors and caregivers, whereas almost half of NMC inquiries (48%) were from individuals identifying as tobacco users. MC and NMC inquiries also differed by CIS access channel (e.g., instant chat, telephone), language used (English vs. Spanish), discussions of cancer continuum phases and cancer sites, and referrals provided to individuals for additional information and resources. Cannabis-related information needs of the public-as documented by the CIS-varied by several factors. Health information sources such as the CIS can help address cannabis-related questions and concerns, while noting differences in who is inquiring, how, and why.

摘要

鉴于医用和非医用大麻的使用都有所增加,公众对大麻使用的潜在风险和益处越来越感兴趣,尤其是与癌症相关的方面。本描述性研究旨在分析国家癌症研究所癌症信息服务处(CIS)接到的有关大麻的咨询。从 2018 年 9 月至 2023 年 6 月,CIS 记录了 190,070 份非大麻和 425 份大麻咨询。大麻咨询分为两类:非医用大麻(NMC,=240)或医用大麻(MC,=185)。采用卡方检验确定非大麻和大麻咨询之间的差异,并采用描述性分析确定大麻特定咨询中的模式。非大麻和大麻咨询之间存在统计学显著差异。此外,MC 和 NMC 咨询也存在差异。例如,73%的 MC 咨询来自癌症幸存者和护理人员,而近一半的 NMC 咨询(48%)来自自称是烟草使用者的人。MC 和 NMC 咨询还通过 CIS 访问渠道(例如即时聊天、电话)、使用的语言(英语与西班牙语)、癌症连续阶段和癌症部位的讨论以及为个人提供的额外信息和资源的转介而有所不同。CIS 记录的公众对大麻的相关信息需求因多种因素而异。CIS 等健康信息来源可以帮助解决与大麻相关的问题和担忧,同时注意到询问者、询问方式和原因的差异。

相似文献

1
Understanding Cannabis-Related Information Needs: An Analysis of Inquiries to the National Cancer Institute's Cancer Information Service.
Cannabis Cannabinoid Res. 2024 Oct;9(5):e1452-e1458. doi: 10.1089/can.2023.0119. Epub 2023 Oct 19.
2
How to Implement Digital Clinical Consultations in UK Maternity Care: the ARM@DA Realist Review.
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 May 21:1-77. doi: 10.3310/WQFV7425.
3
Eliciting adverse effects data from participants in clinical trials.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 16;1(1):MR000039. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000039.pub2.
5
Interventions for interpersonal communication about end of life care between health practitioners and affected people.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 8;7(7):CD013116. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013116.pub2.
6
Ethnic differences in the patterns, sources, and reasons for cannabis use among cancer patients at an NCI-Designated Cancer Center.
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2024 Aug 15;2024(66):252-258. doi: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgad037.
9
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
Cannabis use among cancer survivors in 22 states: Results from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 2020.
Cancer. 2023 Aug 15;129(16):2499-2513. doi: 10.1002/cncr.34793. Epub 2023 Apr 7.
2
Impacts of recreational cannabis legalization on cannabis use: a longitudinal discordant twin study.
Addiction. 2023 Jan;118(1):110-118. doi: 10.1111/add.16016. Epub 2022 Aug 24.
3
Cannabis Use in Patients With Cancer: A Clinical Review.
JCO Oncol Pract. 2022 Nov;18(11):743-749. doi: 10.1200/OP.22.00080. Epub 2022 Jun 24.
4
Perceived Stigma of Patients Undergoing Treatment with Cannabis-Based Medicinal Products.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 19;19(12):7499. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19127499.
5
Nonmedical Cannabis Use: Patterns and Correlates of Use, Exposure, and Harm, and Cancer Risk.
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2021 Nov 28;2021(58):53-67. doi: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgab006.
6
The National Cancer Institute and Cannabis and Cannabinoids Research.
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2021 Nov 28;2021(58):35-38. doi: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgab014.
7
Racial and Ethnic Differences in Cannabis Use Following Legalization in US States With Medical Cannabis Laws.
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Sep 1;4(9):e2127002. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.27002.
8
Prevalence of cannabis use among individuals with a history of cancer in the United States.
Cancer. 2021 Sep 15;127(18):3437-3444. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33646. Epub 2021 Jun 3.
10
Unknown population-level harms of cannabis and tobacco co-use: if you don't measure it, you can't manage it.
Addiction. 2021 Jul;116(7):1622-1630. doi: 10.1111/add.15290. Epub 2020 Nov 20.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验