• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Establishing the core elements of a frailty at the front door model of care using a modified real-time Delphi technique.采用改良实时德尔菲技术确定前门护理衰弱模型的核心要素。
BMC Emerg Med. 2023 Oct 20;23(1):123. doi: 10.1186/s12873-023-00893-9.
2
An international Delphi consensus process to determine a common data element and core outcome set for frailty: FOCUS (The Frailty Outcomes Consensus Project).一项旨在确定衰弱的通用数据元素和核心结局集的国际 Delphi 共识过程:FOCUS(衰弱结局共识项目)。
BMC Geriatr. 2022 Apr 5;22(1):284. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-02993-w.
3
Core requirements of frailty screening in the emergency department: an international Delphi consensus study.急诊科衰弱筛查的核心要求:一项国际德尔菲共识研究。
Age Ageing. 2024 Feb 1;53(2). doi: 10.1093/ageing/afae013.
4
Identifying models of care to improve outcomes for older people with urgent care needs: a mixed methods approach to develop a system dynamics model.确定照护模式以改善有紧急照护需求的老年人的结局:一种开发系统动力学模型的混合方法研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023 Sep;11(14):1-183. doi: 10.3310/NLCT5104.
5
Developing a set of emergency department performance measures to evaluate delirium care quality for older adults: a modified e-Delphi study.制定一套急诊科绩效评估指标,以评估老年人谵妄护理质量:一项改良的电子德尔菲研究。
BMC Emerg Med. 2024 Feb 15;24(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s12873-024-00947-6.
6
Development of a core outcome set for effectiveness trials aimed at optimising prescribing in older adults in care homes.针对疗养院中老年人优化处方的有效性试验核心结局集的制定。
Trials. 2017 Apr 12;18(1):175. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-1915-6.
7
Assessing frailty indicators in the context of psychiatric disorder: A Delphi consensus study.在精神疾病背景下评估衰弱指标:一项德尔菲共识研究。
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2022 Jan;37(1). doi: 10.1002/gps.5642. Epub 2021 Oct 22.
8
The Development of Principles for Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) in Preclinical Spinal Cord Research: A Modified Delphi Study.患者和公众参与(PPI)在临床前脊髓研究中的原则的发展:一项改良德尔菲研究。
Health Expect. 2024 Aug;27(4):e14130. doi: 10.1111/hex.14130.
9
Working Toward Consensus on Sporadic Vestibular Schwannoma Care: A Modified Delphi Study.致力于达成散发性前庭神经鞘瘤护理共识:一项改良 Delphi 研究。
Otol Neurotol. 2020 Dec;41(10):e1360-e1371. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000002917.
10
A consensus statement on minimum operational standards for geriatric emergency care in Belgium: a modified Delphi study.比利时老年急诊护理最低操作标准共识声明:一项改良 Delphi 研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2023 Nov 22;23(1):768. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-04474-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Perspectives on Frailty Among Emergency Physicians: A Qualitative Descriptive Study.急诊医生对衰弱的看法:一项定性描述性研究。
Cureus. 2024 Dec 13;16(12):e75670. doi: 10.7759/cureus.75670. eCollection 2024 Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Frailty Screening in the Emergency Department: Comparing the Variable Indicative of Placement Risk, Clinical Frailty Scale and PRISMA-7.急诊科衰弱筛查:比较安置风险变量指标、临床衰弱量表和 PRISMA-7。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 24;20(1):290. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20010290.
2
Comprehensive geriatric assessment in the emergency department: A protocol for a prospective cohort study.急诊科的综合老年评估:一项前瞻性队列研究方案。
HRB Open Res. 2022 Sep 14;5:26. doi: 10.12688/hrbopenres.13504.2. eCollection 2022.
3
Applying real-time Delphi methods: development of a pain management survey in emergency nursing.应用实时德尔菲法:急诊护理中疼痛管理调查的开展
BMC Nurs. 2021 Aug 18;20(1):149. doi: 10.1186/s12912-021-00661-9.
4
Multi-Round compared to Real-Time Delphi for consensus in core outcome set (COS) development: a randomised trial.多轮与实时德尔菲法在核心结局集(COS)开发中的共识比较:一项随机试验。
Trials. 2021 Feb 15;22(1):142. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05074-2.
5
Improving outcomes for older people in the emergency department: a review of reviews.改善急诊科老年人的结局:系统评价综述。
Emerg Med J. 2021 Dec;38(12):882-888. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2020-209514. Epub 2020 Oct 26.
6
Patient-reported outcome and experience measures in geriatric emergency medicine.老年急诊医学中患者报告的结局和体验指标
Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2021 Mar;54(2):122-124. doi: 10.1007/s00391-020-01777-4. Epub 2020 Sep 16.
7
Functional and cognitive decline in older delirious adults after an emergency department visit.老年急诊谵妄患者在急诊就诊后的功能和认知下降。
Age Ageing. 2021 Jan 8;50(1):135-140. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afaa128.
8
Comprehensive geriatric assessment in the emergency department.急诊科的综合老年评估
Age Ageing. 2020 Oct 23;49(6):936-938. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afaa059.
9
Interventions to improve older adults' Emergency Department patient experience: A systematic review.改善老年人急诊科患者体验的干预措施:系统评价。
Am J Emerg Med. 2020 Jun;38(6):1257-1269. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2020.03.012. Epub 2020 Mar 12.
10
What older people want from emergency care: a systematic review.老年人对急诊服务的需求:系统评价。
Emerg Med J. 2019 Dec;36(12):754-761. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2019-208589. Epub 2019 Oct 24.

采用改良实时德尔菲技术确定前门护理衰弱模型的核心要素。

Establishing the core elements of a frailty at the front door model of care using a modified real-time Delphi technique.

机构信息

School of Allied Health, Faculty of Education and Health Sciences, Ageing Research Centre, Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.

Clinical Design and Innovation, Health Service Executive, National Clinical Programme for Older People, Dublin, Ireland.

出版信息

BMC Emerg Med. 2023 Oct 20;23(1):123. doi: 10.1186/s12873-023-00893-9.

DOI:10.1186/s12873-023-00893-9
PMID:37858041
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10588204/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Innovations in models of care for older adults living with frailty presenting to the emergency department (ED) have become a key priority for clinicians, researchers and policymakers due to the deleterious outcomes older adults experience due to prolonged exposure to such an environment. This study aimed to develop a set of expert consensus-based statements underpinning operational design, outcome measurement and evaluation of a Frailty at the Front Door (FFD) model of care for older adults within an Irish context.

METHODS

A modified real-time Delphi method was used. Facilitation of World Café focus groups with an expert panel of 86 members and seperate advisory groups with a Public and Patient Involvement panel of older adults and members of the Irish Association of Emergency Medicine generated a series of statements on the core elements of the FFD model of care. Statements were analysed thematically and incorporated into a real-time Delphi survey, which was emailed to members of the expert panel. Members were asked to rank 70 statements across nine domains using a 9-point Likert scale. Consensus criteria were defined a priori and guided by previous research using 9-point rating scales.

RESULTS

Fifty members responded to the survey representing an overall response rate of 58%. Following analyses of the survey responses, the research team reviewed statements for content overlap and refined a final list of statements across the following domains: aims and objectives of the FFD model of care; target population; screening and assessment; interventions; technology; integration of care; evaluation and metrics; and research.

CONCLUSION

Development of a consensus derived FFD model of care represents an important step in generating national standards, implementation of a service model as intended and enhances opportunities for scientific impact. Future research should focus on the development of a core outcome set for studies involving older adults in the ED.

摘要

背景

由于老年人在急诊科(ED)中长时间暴露于这种环境中,会导致不良后果,因此,创新老年人脆弱模型的护理模式已成为临床医生、研究人员和政策制定者的主要重点。本研究旨在制定一套基于专家共识的陈述,为爱尔兰背景下的老年人脆弱性前门(FFD)护理模式的操作设计、结果测量和评估提供依据。

方法

采用改良实时 Delphi 方法。通过 86 名专家小组的世界咖啡馆焦点小组讨论和公共与患者参与小组的单独咨询小组,与老年人和爱尔兰急诊医学协会成员一起,生成了一系列关于 FFD 护理模式核心要素的陈述。对陈述进行主题分析,并将其纳入实时 Delphi 调查,该调查通过电子邮件发送给专家小组的成员。成员被要求使用 9 分李克特量表对 9 个领域的 70 个陈述进行排名。共识标准是根据之前使用 9 分评分量表的研究预先定义的。

结果

50 名成员对调查做出了回应,总体回应率为 58%。在对调查结果进行分析后,研究小组对陈述的内容重叠进行了审查,并在以下领域中列出了最终的陈述清单:FFD 护理模式的目标和目的;目标人群;筛选和评估;干预措施;技术;护理整合;评估和指标;以及研究。

结论

制定共识驱动的 FFD 护理模式代表了制定国家标准、按预期实施服务模式以及增强科学影响力的重要步骤。未来的研究应集中在为涉及急诊科老年人的研究制定核心结局集。