Zhang Ling, Song Guobao, Yu Keli, Cheng Yunlai, Zhao Xinyue, Lv Lin, Qian Huimin, Liu Gang
Key Laboratory of Industrial Ecology and Environmental Engineering (Ministry of Education); School of Environmental Science and Technology, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China.
China National Resources Recycling Association, Room 8321, No. 13 Yue Tan Bei Xiao Jie, Xicheng District, Beijing 100037, China.
Environ Sci Technol. 2023 Oct 31;57(43):16153-16165. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.3c03494. Epub 2023 Oct 20.
China's enterprises of waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE) recycling suffer from low profitability that is highly dependent on government subsidies. This low economic gain impedes the sustainable growth of China's WEEE-recycling sector and also adds to the government's financial burden. Prior life-cycle studies have approved the carbon reduction potentials or net carbon credit of recycling WEEE. However, policymakers fail to know whether the revenue from selling carbon credits can offset the government's financial subsidy. We performed life-cycle and cost-benefit analyses for a case recycling enterprise that processes six categories of household appliances. The results show that the reduction potentials of greenhouse gases range from 930-3450 kgCOe by recycling per ton of household appliances and materials substitution. The recycling enterprise would gain extra revenue ranging from 32 to 160 RMB per ton of appliance if the carbon credits were sold at China's current carbon price, i.e., 45-60 RMB tCOe. Recycling waste refrigerators exhibits the highest carbon revenue, offsetting 6-17% of the government's financial subsidy. Microcomputers, by contrast, indicate the lowest carbon revenue, equivalent to 1-3% of its highest government subsidy. For each household appliance category, when the carbon price reaches 270-600 RMB tCOe, selling carbon credits can fully offset the government's financial subsidy. Constrained by the processing capacity of the case enterprise, optimizations for appliance-recycling composition contribute a 15-25% profit growth to the current economic gains. Interpreting the specific profit depends on the predefined scenarios of carbon price and the substitution rate of the regenerated materials for the virginal ones. Our findings show that raising the profitability of WEEE recycling enterprises through the carbon trading policy contributes to the sustainable growth of China's WEEE-recycling sector while alleviating the government's financial burden.
中国废弃电器电子产品(WEEE)回收企业盈利能力较低,高度依赖政府补贴。这种低经济收益阻碍了中国WEEE回收行业的可持续增长,也增加了政府的财政负担。先前的生命周期研究已经证实了回收WEEE的碳减排潜力或净碳信用额度。然而,政策制定者并不清楚出售碳信用额度的收入是否能够抵消政府的财政补贴。我们对一家处理六类家用电器的案例回收企业进行了生命周期和成本效益分析。结果表明,通过每吨家用电器回收和材料替代,温室气体减排潜力在930-3450千克二氧化碳当量之间。如果按照中国当前的碳价(即45-60元/吨二氧化碳当量)出售碳信用额度,该回收企业每吨电器将获得32至160元的额外收入。回收废旧冰箱的碳收入最高,可抵消政府财政补贴的6-17%。相比之下,微型计算机的碳收入最低,相当于其最高政府补贴的1-3%。对于每类家用电器,当碳价达到270-600元/吨二氧化碳当量时,出售碳信用额度可以完全抵消政府的财政补贴。受案例企业处理能力的限制,对电器回收成分进行优化可使当前经济收益增长15-25%。具体利润的解读取决于预先设定的碳价情景以及再生材料对原生材料的替代率。我们的研究结果表明,通过碳交易政策提高WEEE回收企业的盈利能力,有助于中国WEEE回收行业的可持续增长,同时减轻政府的财政负担。