Suppr超能文献

基于机器学习的计算机辅助 COVID-19 肺炎简易分诊(CAST)与胸部放射科认证医师分诊的比较。

Machine learning-based computer-aided simple triage (CAST) for COVID-19 pneumonia as compared with triage by board-certified chest radiologists.

机构信息

Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, 1-98 Dengakugakubo, Kutsukake-Cho, Toyoake, Aichi, 470-1192, Japan.

Joint Research Laboratory of Advanced Medical Imaging, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Aichi, Japan.

出版信息

Jpn J Radiol. 2024 Mar;42(3):276-290. doi: 10.1007/s11604-023-01495-y. Epub 2023 Oct 20.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Several reporting systems have been proposed for providing standardized language and diagnostic categories aiming for expressing the likelihood that lung abnormalities on CT images represent COVID-19. We developed a machine learning (ML)-based CT texture analysis software for simple triage based on the RSNA Expert Consensus Statement system. The purpose of this study was to conduct a multi-center and multi-reader study to determine the capability of ML-based computer-aided simple triage (CAST) software based on RSNA expert consensus statements for diagnosis of COVID-19 pneumonia.

METHODS

For this multi-center study, 174 cases who had undergone CT and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests for COVID-19 were retrospectively included. Their CT data were then assessed by CAST and consensus from three board-certified chest radiologists, after which all cases were classified as either positive or negative. Diagnostic performance was then compared by McNemar's test. To determine radiological finding evaluation capability of CAST, three other board-certified chest radiologists assessed CAST results for radiological findings into five criteria. Finally, accuracies of all radiological evaluations were compared by McNemar's test.

RESULTS

A comparison of diagnosis for COVID-19 pneumonia based on RT-PCR results for cases with COVID-19 pneumonia findings on CT showed no significant difference of diagnostic performance between ML-based CAST software and consensus evaluation (p > 0.05). Comparison of agreement on accuracy for all radiological finding evaluations showed that emphysema evaluation accuracy for investigator A (AC = 91.7%) was significantly lower than that for investigators B (100%, p = 0.0009) and C (100%, p = 0.0009).

CONCLUSION

This multi-center study shows COVID-19 pneumonia triage by CAST can be considered at least as valid as that by chest expert radiologists and may be capable for playing as useful a complementary role for management of suspected COVID-19 pneumonia patients as well as the RT-PCR test in routine clinical practice.

摘要

目的

已经提出了几种报告系统,以提供标准化的语言和诊断类别,旨在表达 CT 图像上的肺部异常是否代表 COVID-19 的可能性。我们开发了一种基于 RSNA 专家共识声明系统的机器学习 (ML) 基于 CT 纹理分析软件,用于简单分诊。本研究的目的是进行多中心和多读者研究,以确定基于 RSNA 专家共识声明的基于 ML 的计算机辅助简单分诊 (CAST) 软件诊断 COVID-19 肺炎的能力。

方法

在这项多中心研究中,回顾性纳入了 174 例接受过 COVID-19 CT 和聚合酶链反应 (PCR) 检测的患者。然后,由 CAST 和三名经过董事会认证的胸部放射科医生的共识对其 CT 数据进行评估,之后所有病例均分为阳性或阴性。然后通过 McNemar 检验比较诊断性能。为了确定 CAST 的放射学发现评估能力,另外三名经过董事会认证的胸部放射科医生将 CAST 结果评估为五个标准的放射学发现。最后,通过 McNemar 检验比较所有放射学评估的准确性。

结果

基于 CT 上 COVID-19 肺炎发现的 RT-PCR 结果对 COVID-19 肺炎病例进行诊断的比较表明,基于 ML 的 CAST 软件和共识评估的诊断性能无显著差异(p>0.05)。比较所有放射学发现评估准确性的一致性表明,研究者 A 的肺气肿评估准确性(AC=91.7%)明显低于研究者 B(100%,p=0.0009)和研究者 C(100%,p=0.0009)。

结论

这项多中心研究表明,CAST 对 COVID-19 肺炎的分诊至少可以与胸部专家放射科医生一样有效,并且可能能够在常规临床实践中与 RT-PCR 测试一样,为疑似 COVID-19 肺炎患者的管理提供有用的补充作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c0f/10899374/1935c53bd2e7/11604_2023_1495_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验