Pinho Mariana, Colston Belinda
Centre for Environmental & Marine Studies, Department of Biology, University of Aveiro, Campus Universitário De Santiago, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal.
Eleanor Glanville Institute, University of Lincoln, Lincoln, UK.
J Manag Gov. 2025;29(3):815-847. doi: 10.1007/s10997-024-09721-z. Epub 2024 Oct 12.
The current study explores how organizational dimensions relate to and impact organizational commitment, comparing staff in academic positions with staff in professional services roles. Data was collected from 281 academic and 294 professional services staff within university environments who completed extensive questionnaires. Overall academics manifested lower levels of emotional attachment to, and perceived obligation to remain in their university, felt less safe to take interpersonal risks, to speak up and lower support for their work-life balance than their professional services colleagues. The perception of procedural fairness and discrimination impacted academics loyalty and felt obligation to remain and reciprocate organizational investments to a higher extent. Psychological safety positively influenced staff's commitment. Emotional and obligation-based types of commitment were more strongly affected by psychological safety among academics than professional services staff. Finally, work-life balance support positively influenced staff's commitment, appearing to be an equally important dimension to drive emotional and obligation-based types of commitment from both academics and professional services staff. This study brings important contributions to research on the working environment of academics and professional services staff and indicates that development of clear policies to promote and maintain fairness, psychological safety and work-life balance, together with active monitoring and evaluation of their impact, should be a key focus for higher education institutions.
本研究探讨组织维度如何与组织承诺相关联并对其产生影响,同时比较学术岗位员工与专业服务岗位员工的情况。研究数据收集自大学环境中的281名学术人员和294名专业服务人员,他们完成了详尽的问卷调查。总体而言,与专业服务岗位的同事相比,学术人员对所在大学的情感依恋程度较低,对留在大学的责任感较弱,在人际交往中承担风险、直言不讳的安全感较低,对工作与生活平衡的支持度也较低。程序公平感和歧视感对学术人员的忠诚度以及留在组织并回报组织投入的责任感有更大影响。心理安全感对员工的组织承诺有积极影响。在学术人员中,基于情感和责任感的组织承诺类型比专业服务人员更受心理安全感的强烈影响。最后,工作与生活平衡支持对员工的组织承诺有积极影响,似乎是推动学术人员和专业服务人员基于情感和责任感的组织承诺类型的同等重要维度。本研究为学术人员和专业服务人员工作环境的研究做出了重要贡献,并表明制定明确政策以促进和维护公平、心理安全感和工作与生活平衡,同时积极监测和评估其影响,应成为高等教育机构的关键关注点。