Chavda Vivek P, Balar Pankti C, Nalla Lakshmi Vineela, Bezbaruah Rajashri, Gogoi Niva Rani, Gajula Siva Nageswara Rao, Peng Berney, Meena Avtar S, Conde João, Prasad Rajendra
Department of Pharmaceutics and Pharmaceutical Technology, L.M. College of Pharmacy, Ahmedabad 380001, India.
Pharmacy Section, L.M. College of Pharmacy, Ahmedabad 380001, India.
ACS Omega. 2023 Oct 5;8(41):37654-37684. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.3c05069. eCollection 2023 Oct 17.
Cancer diagnoses have been increasing worldwide, and solid tumors are among the leading contributors to patient mortality, creating an enormous burden on the global healthcare system. Cancer is responsible for around 10.3 million deaths worldwide. Solid tumors are one of the most prevalent cancers observed in recent times. On the other hand, early diagnosis is a significant challenge that could save a person's life. Treatment with existing methods has pitfalls that limit the successful elimination of the disorder. Though nanoparticle-based imaging and therapeutics have shown a significant impact in healthcare, current methodologies for solid tumor treatment are insufficient. There are multiple complications associated with the diagnosis and management of solid tumors as well. Recently, surface-conjugated nanoparticles such as lipid nanoparticles, metallic nanoparticles, and quantum dots have shown positive results in solid tumor diagnostics and therapeutics in preclinical models. Other nanotheranostic material platforms such as plasmonic theranostics, magnetotheranostics, hybrid nanotheranostics, and graphene theranostics have also been explored. These nanoparticle theranostics ensure the appropriate targeting of tumors along with selective delivery of cargos (both imaging and therapeutic probes) without affecting the surrounding healthy tissues. Though they have multiple applications, nanoparticles still possess numerous limitations that need to be addressed in order to be fully utilized in the clinic. In this review, we outline the importance of materials and design strategies used to engineer nanoparticles in the treatment and diagnosis of solid tumors and how effectively each method overcomes the drawbacks of the current techniques. We also highlight the gaps in each material platform and how design considerations can address their limitations in future research directions.
全球癌症诊断数量一直在增加,实体瘤是导致患者死亡的主要原因之一,给全球医疗系统带来了巨大负担。癌症在全球范围内导致约1030万人死亡。实体瘤是近年来观察到的最常见癌症之一。另一方面,早期诊断是一项重大挑战,却可能挽救一个人的生命。采用现有方法进行治疗存在缺陷,限制了疾病的成功根除。尽管基于纳米颗粒的成像和治疗方法在医疗保健领域已显示出重大影响,但目前用于实体瘤治疗的方法仍不充分。实体瘤的诊断和管理也存在多种并发症。最近,脂质纳米颗粒、金属纳米颗粒和量子点等表面共轭纳米颗粒在临床前模型的实体瘤诊断和治疗中已显示出积极效果。其他纳米诊疗材料平台,如等离子体诊疗、磁诊疗、混合纳米诊疗和石墨烯诊疗也已得到探索。这些纳米颗粒诊疗方法可确保对肿瘤进行适当靶向,并选择性递送货物(成像和治疗探针),而不影响周围健康组织。尽管纳米颗粒有多种应用,但为了在临床上充分利用它们,仍有许多局限性需要解决。在这篇综述中,我们概述了用于设计纳米颗粒以治疗和诊断实体瘤的材料和设计策略的重要性,以及每种方法如何有效克服当前技术的缺点。我们还强调了每个材料平台的差距,以及设计考虑因素如何在未来研究方向中解决它们的局限性。