• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

支持有效性:将技术应用和评估置于学习情境的步骤。

Supporting validity: steps to contextualise applications for technology and assessment, for learning.

作者信息

Kemp Sandra, Goddard Viktoria C T, Boursicot Katharine, Fuller Richard, Nadarajah Vishna Devi

机构信息

University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia.

University of Liverpool, Liverpool, England, UK.

出版信息

MedEdPublish (2016). 2023 Jul 19;13:37. doi: 10.12688/mep.19688.1. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.12688/mep.19688.1
PMID:37868340
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10587818/
Abstract

In the paper, the authors offer perspectives on the uses of technology and assessment, that support learning. The perspectives are viewed through validity (from the field of assessment) as a framework and they discuss four aspects of an interconnected technology, learning and assessment space that represent theory informed, authentic practice. The four are: 1) integrated coherence for learning, assessment and technology; 2) responsibilities for equity, diversity, inclusion and wellbeing; 3) sustainability; and 4) balancing resources in global contexts. The authors propose steps and considerations for medical and health professions educators who need to contextualise applications for technology, learning and assessment, for positive impact for learners, faculty, institutions and patient care.

摘要

在该论文中,作者们就支持学习的技术应用和评估提供了观点。这些观点以效度(来自评估领域)为框架进行审视,并且他们讨论了相互关联的技术、学习和评估空间的四个方面,这些方面代表了基于理论的真实实践。这四个方面是:1)学习、评估和技术的整合连贯性;2)公平、多样性、包容性和福祉方面的责任;3)可持续性;4)在全球背景下平衡资源。作者们为医学和健康专业教育工作者提出了步骤和注意事项,这些教育工作者需要将技术、学习和评估的应用置于具体情境中,以对学习者、教师、机构和患者护理产生积极影响。

相似文献

1
Supporting validity: steps to contextualise applications for technology and assessment, for learning.支持有效性:将技术应用和评估置于学习情境的步骤。
MedEdPublish (2016). 2023 Jul 19;13:37. doi: 10.12688/mep.19688.1. eCollection 2023.
2
High engagement, high quality: A guiding framework for developing empirically informed asynchronous e-learning programs for health professional educators.高度参与,高质量:为健康专业教育工作者开发基于实证的异步电子学习项目的指导框架。
Nurs Health Sci. 2017 Mar;19(1):126-137. doi: 10.1111/nhs.12322. Epub 2017 Jan 16.
3
Ten Questions to Guide Learners Seeking Equitable Global Health Experiences Abroad.十问,助学习者寻求海外公平的全球健康体验
Acad Med. 2023 Oct 1;98(10):1107-1112. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000005255. Epub 2023 Apr 21.
4
The impact on practice of authentic assessment as part of a university postgraduate taught programme of study for nursing and healthcare professionals: a literature review.真实评估对护理和医疗保健专业大学研究生教学课程实践的影响:文献回顾。
Nurse Educ Today. 2023 Jan;120:105622. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105622. Epub 2022 Nov 8.
5
IMPROVing communication about diversity, equity, and inclusion in health professions education.促进卫生专业教育领域多样性、公平性和包容性的沟通。
Anat Rec (Hoboken). 2022 Apr;305(4):1000-1018. doi: 10.1002/ar.24864. Epub 2022 Feb 1.
6
The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.综合护理路径在医疗环境中对成人和儿童的有效性:一项系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(3):80-129. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907030-00001.
7
The educators' experience: Learning environments that support the master adaptive learner.教育者的经验:支持主导适应型学习者的学习环境。
Med Teach. 2020 Nov;42(11):1270-1274. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2020.1801998. Epub 2020 Aug 5.
8
Learners With Disabilities: An Important Component of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Medical Education.残疾学习者:医学教育中多样性、公平性和包容性的重要组成部分。
Acad Med. 2022 Mar 1;97(3):328-330. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000004496.
9
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
10
Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.基于母婴模拟学习的学生和教育工作者体验:定性证据协议的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):14-26. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1694.

本文引用的文献

1
Using learning analytics in clinical competency committees: Increasing the impact of competency-based medical education.在临床能力委员会中使用学习分析:提高基于能力的医学教育的影响力。
Med Educ Online. 2023 Dec;28(1):2178913. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2023.2178913.
2
Technology enhanced assessment: Ottawa consensus statement and recommendations.技术增强评估:渥太华共识声明与建议
Med Teach. 2022 Aug;44(8):836-850. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2022.2083489. Epub 2022 Jun 30.
3
Rethinking implementation science for health professions education: A manifesto for change.重新思考健康职业教育中的实施科学:变革宣言。
Perspect Med Educ. 2021 Dec;10(6):362-368. doi: 10.1007/s40037-021-00688-3. Epub 2021 Nov 10.
4
Performance assessment: Consensus statement and recommendations from the 2020 Ottawa Conference.表现评估:2020 年渥太华会议的共识声明和建议。
Med Teach. 2021 Jan;43(1):58-67. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2020.1830052. Epub 2020 Oct 14.
5
Could COVID-19 be our 'There is no alternative' (TINA) opportunity to enhance assessment?新冠疫情会成为我们提升评估的“别无选择”(TINA)契机吗?
Med Teach. 2020 Jul;42(7):781-786. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2020.1779206. Epub 2020 Jun 19.
6
2018 Consensus framework for good assessment.2018 年良好评估共识框架。
Med Teach. 2018 Nov;40(11):1102-1109. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2018.1500016. Epub 2018 Oct 9.
7
Using "big data" to guide implementation of a web and mobile adaptive learning platform for medical students.利用“大数据”指导医学生网络和移动自适应学习平台的实施。
Med Teach. 2017 Sep;39(9):975-980. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2017.1324949. Epub 2017 May 16.
8
A contemporary approach to validity arguments: a practical guide to Kane's framework.效度论证的当代方法:凯恩框架实用指南
Med Educ. 2015 Jun;49(6):560-75. doi: 10.1111/medu.12678.
9
Preparedness is not enough: understanding transitions as critically intensive learning periods.准备工作还不够:将过渡理解为批判性强化学习期。
Med Educ. 2011 Oct;45(10):1006-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04048.x.
10
Ottawa 2010 Conference--consensus statements and recommendations.渥太华2010年会议——共识声明与建议
Med Teach. 2011;33(3):181-2. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2011.551562.